Risk of Secondary ACL Injury in Adolescents Prescribed Functional Bracing After ACL Reconstruction

Gabriel S Perrone, Kate E Webster, Chris Imbriaco, Gabriela M Portilla, Amishi Vairagade, Martha M Murray, Ata M Kiapour, Gabriel S Perrone, Kate E Webster, Chris Imbriaco, Gabriela M Portilla, Amishi Vairagade, Martha M Murray, Ata M Kiapour

Abstract

Background: There is a high incidence of a secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in unbraced adolescent athletes. Little is known about the effect of functional bracing with regard to the risk of secondary ACL injuries among adolescents.

Hypothesis: Our primary hypothesis was that adolescents would have a high rate of secondary ACL injury even with brace use. A secondary hypothesis was that the reinjury rate with brace use would be lower than that of a historical control group of unbraced patients.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A group of 219 patients (age <20 years at surgery) who underwent ACL reconstruction and were prescribed postoperative functional bracing during cutting and pivoting sports for 2 years after surgery completed a survey regarding reinjury to either knee. Rates of knee injuries following ACL reconstruction were calculated and compared with those reported in a similar unbraced cohort. The effect of demographic and anatomic factors on risk of secondary ACL injuries was also investigated.

Results: The overall follow-up rate was 65% (142/219) at a mean 5.6 years after surgery. In the braced cohort, the overall graft retear rate was 10%, with the highest retear rates observed in male patients 17 years of age and younger (18%). The overall contralateral ACL injury and combined (graft or contralateral ACL) secondary injury rates were 13% and 23%, respectively, with female patients younger than 18 years having the highest contralateral and combined injury rates (17% and 26%, respectively). Younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; P = .021), family history of ACL injury (OR, 2.81; P = .015), and higher lateral tibial slope (OR, 1.25; P = .016) were associated with increased risk of secondary knee injury in the braced cohort. Compared with the unbraced cohort, the braced cohort had a lower overall graft retear rate (P = .028), a lower graft retear rate in patients younger than 18 years (P = .012), lower early graft retear rate (within the first year after surgery) (P = .011), and lower early graft retear rate in subjects younger than 18 years (P = .003).

Conclusion: Postoperative use of functional bracing can result in reduced risk of graft retear and no change in contralateral injury rates. Clinicians may want to consider the use of postoperative functional bracing in adolescent patients.

Keywords: ACL reconstruction; functional bracing; graft injury.

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding for this study was provided from the Children’s Hospital Orthopaedic Surgery Foundation and the Children’s Hospital Sports Medicine Foundation. This research was also conducted with support from the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University. The Football Players Health Study is funded by a grant from the National Football League Players Association. M.M.M. and Boston Children’s Hospital have equity interests in MIACH Orthopaedics, a company that has licensed the BEAR scaffolding technology from Boston Children’s Hospital. M.M.M. has received royalties from Springer Publishing; research support from the National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, and National Football League Players Association through the Harvard Football Players Health Study; and honoraria from the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation. A.M.K. receives research support from the National Institutes of Health and National Football League Players Association through the Harvard Football Players Health Study. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

© The Author(s) 2019.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Frequency distribution of bracing years (n = 135).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage of patients who sustained a graft rupture, contralateral ACL injury, and overall secondary ACL injury (ipsilateral or contralateral) per age group: 12-14 years (n = 28), 15-17 years (n = 87), and 18-19 years (n = 20). ACL, anterior cruciate ligament.
Figure A1.
Figure A1.
Measurement techniques used to quantify notch width (NW), coronal tibial slope (CTS), medial tibial slope (MTS), medial tibial depth (MTD), and lateral tibial slope (LTS).

References

    1. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(7):596–606.
    1. Borchers JR, Pedroza A, Kaeding C. Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2362–2367.
    1. Bordes P, Laboute E, Bertolotti A, et al. No beneficial effect of bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cohort of 969 athletes followed in rehabilitation. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(4):230–236.
    1. Bourke HE, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Patterson V, Pinczewski LA. Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(9):1985–1992.
    1. Christensen JJ, Krych AJ, Engasser WM, Vanhees MK, Collins MS, Dahm DL. Lateral tibial posterior slope is increased in patients with early graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2510–2514.
    1. Decoster LC, Vailas JC. Functional anterior cruciate ligament bracing: a survey of current brace prescription patterns. Orthopedics. 2003;26(7):701–706.
    1. Delay BS, Smolinski RJ, Wind WM, Bowman DS. Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14(2):85–91.
    1. Feller JA, Cooper R, Webster KE. Current Australian trends in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2002;9(2):121–126.
    1. Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B, et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2724–2734.
    1. Hudek R, Schmutz S, Regenfelder F, Fuchs B, Koch PP. Novel measurement technique of the tibial slope on conventional MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):2066–2072.
    1. Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Consortium M, Spindler KP. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1583–1590.
    1. Kamath GV, Murphy T, Creighton RA, Viradia N, Taft TN, Spang JT. Anterior cruciate ligament injury, return to play, and reinjury in the elite collegiate athlete: analysis of an NCAA Division I cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1638–1643.
    1. Levins JG, Argentieri EC, Sturnick DR, et al. Geometric characteristics of the knee are associated with a noncontact ACL injury to the contralateral knee after unilateral ACL injury in young female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(14):3223–3232.
    1. Levins JG, Sturnick DR, Argentieri EC, et al. Geometric risk factors associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament graft rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2537–2545.
    1. Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB. Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1551–1557.
    1. Lowe WR, Warth RJ, Davis EP, Bailey L. Functional bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):239–249.
    1. Moon Knee Group, Spindler KP, Huston LJ, et al. Ten-year outcomes and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a MOON longitudinal prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(4):815–825.
    1. Park JS, Nam DC, Kim DH, Kim HK, Hwang SC. Measurement of knee morphometrics using MRI: a comparative study between ACL-injured and non-injured knees. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012;24(3):180–185.
    1. Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(2):116.
    1. Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1567–1573.
    1. Pauzenberger L, Syré S, Schurz M. “Ligamentization” in hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature and a glimpse into the future. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(10):1712–1721.
    1. Pinczewski LA, Morgan M, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Thompson S, Roe JP. 15 year survival of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years and under. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(3)(suppl):2325967115S2325900007.
    1. Salmon LJ, Heath E, Akrawi H, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA. 20-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(3):531–543.
    1. Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M. Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(2):246–251.
    1. Webb JM, Salmon LJ, Leclerc E, Pinczewski LA, Roe JP. Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patient. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2800–2804.
    1. Webster KE, Feller JA. Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):2827–2832.
    1. Webster KE, Feller JA. Return to level I sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of age, sex, and readiness to return criteria. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(8):2325967118788045.
    1. Webster KE, Feller JA, Leigh WB, Richmond AK. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):641–647.
    1. Whitney DC, Sturnick DR, Vacek PM, et al. Relationship between the risk of suffering a first-time noncontact ACL injury and geometry of the femoral notch and ACL: a prospective cohort study with a nested case-control analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1796–1805.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa