Women's experiences of fistula-related stigma in Uganda: a conceptual framework to inform stigma-reduction interventions

Abstract

Fistula-related stigma is common. The absence of a unifying conceptual framework prevents a nuanced understanding of the nature of fistula-related stigma, comparison across contexts and the ability to contrast with other stigmas. It also hinders intervention development. We conducted in-depth interviews or focus groups with 60 women who had undergone fistula surgery 6-24 months prior at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda in 2014. Transcripts were analysed for experiences and consequences of enacted, anticipated and internalised stigma. Narratives revealed experiences with enacted stigma, including gossip, verbal abuse and social exclusion. Women also anticipated and feared stigma in the future. Internalised stigma reports revealed shame and low self-esteem: self-worth reduction, feeling disgraced and envisioning no future. Consequences included social isolation, changes to normal activities, non-disclosure and poor mental health. Refining stigma theory to specific conditions has resulted in a more nuanced understanding of stigma dimensions, manifestations, mechanisms and consequences, permitting comparison across contexts and populations and the development of stigma-reduction interventions. These lessons should be applied to fistula, acknowledging unique features: concealability, the potential for treatment, lack of community awareness and the social consequences of stillbirth. Reducing fistula-related stigma requires timely surgery and supportive care, stigma-reduction interventions and addressing the complex societal structures that perpetuate fistula.

Keywords: Stigma; Uganda; genital fistula; maternal morbidity; obstructed labour.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.

Conceptual framework for fistula-related stigma.