The effect of trimodal prehabilitation on the physical and psychological health of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a randomised clinical trial

A Fulop, L Lakatos, N Susztak, A Szijarto, B Banky, A Fulop, L Lakatos, N Susztak, A Szijarto, B Banky

Abstract

Prehabilitation aims to increase the endurance capacity of patients who are awaiting major surgery. However, there are no studies investigating the implementation of this demanding and expensive intervention in low-income countries. This study aimed to assess the impact of a 4-week trimodal prehabilitation program on the physical and psychological health of patients waiting for colorectal surgery compared with a control group managed according to enhanced recovery after surgery principles supplemented by nutritional care. This study was a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome measures for the physical aspects were 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and incentive spirometry, whereas the psychological elements were measured using the 36-item short form survey questionnaire and the hospital anxiety and depression score. In total, data from 149 patients were analysed (77 in the prehabilitation group and 72 in the control group). At the time of surgery, patients in the prehabilitation group had improved 6MWD and incentive spirometry compared with the control group (median (IQR [range]) percentage improvement 131% (112-173 [68-376]) vs. 107% (99-120 [63-163]); p < 0.001 and 113% (100-125 [75-200]) vs. 100% (100-112 [86-167]); p < 0.001 respectively). Patients in the prehabilitation group also had reduced anxiety scores compared with the control group (mean (SD) anxiety score (4 (3) vs. 5 (3) respectively; p = 0.032). However, these effects did not translate into improvements in postoperative mortality and morbidity, or a reduction in duration of hospital stay. Trimodal (physical, emotional and nutritional) prehabilitation is able to improve functional status as well as some parameters of emotional and physical well-being of patients waiting for colorectal surgery.

Keywords: ERAS; colorectal surgery; nutrition; physical exercise; prehabilitation.

© 2020 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

References

    1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 2017; 66: 683-91.
    1. Feeney G, Sehgal R, Sheehan M, et al. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer management. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2019; 25: 4850-69.
    1. Braun M, Hill J, Kuryba A, et al. National Bowel Cancer Audit. Annual Report - 2016. Version 2 2016.
    1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1997; 78: 606-17.
    1. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World Journal of Surgery 2019; 43: 659-95.
    1. Hu WH, Cajas-Monson LC, Eisenstein S, Parry L, Cosman B, Ramamoorthy S. Preoperative malnutrition assessments as predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity in colorectal cancer: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP. Nutrition Journal 2015; 14: 91.
    1. Weimann A. Influence of nutritional status on postoperative outcome in patients with colorectal cancer - the emerging role of the microbiome. Innovative Surgical Sciences 2018; 3: 55-64.
    1. Rinninella E, Persiani R, D'Ugo D, etet al. NutriCatt protocol in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for colorectal surgery: The nutritional support improves clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes. Nutrition 2018; 50: 74-81.
    1. Silver JK, Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013; 92: 715-27.
    1. Chen BP, Awasthi R, Sweet SN, et al. Four-week prehabilitation program is sufficient to modify exercise behaviors and improve preoperative functional walking capacity in patients with colorectal cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer 2017; 25: 33-40.
    1. Li C, Carli F, Lee L, et al. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surgical Endoscopy 2013; 27: 1072-82.
    1. Minnella EM, Bousquet-Dion G, Awasthi R, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Carli F. Multimodal prehabilitation improves functional capacity before and after colorectal surgery for cancer: a five-year research experience. Acta Oncologica 2017; 56: 295-300.
    1. Li MH, Bolshinsky V, Ismail H, et al. A cross-sectional survey of Australian anesthetists' and surgeons' perceptions of preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2019; 66: 388-405.
    1. Pedziwiatr M, Wierdak M, Nowakowski M, etet al. Cost minimization analysis of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: a single-centre, case-matched study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2016; 11: 14-21.
    1. Banky B, Lakatos M, Varga K, Hansagi E, Horvath E, Jaray G. Enhanced Recovery Program in colorectal surgery. Magyar Sebeszet 2018; 71: 3-11.
    1. Bromage SJ, Cunliffe WJ. Validation of the CR-POSSUM risk-adjusted scoring system for major colorectal cancer surgery in a single center. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2007; 50: 192-6.
    1. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clinical Nutrition 2017; 36: 623-50.
    1. Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, et al. prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology 2014; 121: 937-47.
    1. Czimbalmos Á, Nagy Z, Varga Z, Husztik P. Páciens megelégedettségi vizsgálat SF-36 kérdőívvel, a magyarországi normálértékek meghatározása. Népegészségügy 1999; 1: 19.
    1. Muszbek K, Szekely A, Balogh EM, et al. Validation of the Hungarian translation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Quality of Life Research 2006; 15: 761-6.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 2004; 240: 205-13.
    1. McLennan E, Oliphant R, Moug SJ. Limited preoperative physical capacity continues to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes within a colorectal ERAS programme. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2019; 101: 261-7.
    1. Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, et al. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. British Journal of Surgery 2010; 97: 1187-97.
    1. Casanova C, Celli BR, Barria P, et al. The 6-min walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from seven countries. European Respiratory Journal 2011; 37: 150-6.
    1. Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Gillis C, et al. Patients with poor baseline walking capacity are most likely to improve their functional status with multimodal prehabilitation. Surgery 2016; 160: 1070-9.
    1. Barrett-Bernstein M, Carli F, Gamsa A, et al. Depression and functional status in colorectal cancer patients awaiting surgery: Impact of a multimodal prehabilitation program. Health Psychology 2019; 38: 900-9.
    1. Awdeh H, Kassak K, Sfeir P, Hatoum H, Bitar H, Husari A. The SF-36 and 6-Minute Walk Test are significant predictors of complications after major surgery. World Journal of Surgery 2015; 39: 1406-12.
    1. van Rooijen S, Carli F, Dalton S, et al. Multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity and reduce postoperative complications: the first international randomized controlled trial for multimodal prehabilitation. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 98.
    1. Trepanier M, Minnella EM, Paradis T, et al. Improved disease-free survival after prehabilitation for colorectal cancer surgery. Annals of Surgery 2019; 270: 493-501.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa