Dupilumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Prior Use of Systemic Non-Steroidal Immunosuppressants: Analysis of Four Phase 3 Trials

Christopher Griffiths, Marjolein de Bruin-Weller, Mette Deleuran, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Delphine Staumont-Sallé, Chih-Ho Hong, Jose Sánchez-Carazo, Peter Foley, Seong Jun Seo, Jérôme Msihid, Zhen Chen, Sonya L Cyr, Ana B Rossi, Christopher Griffiths, Marjolein de Bruin-Weller, Mette Deleuran, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Delphine Staumont-Sallé, Chih-Ho Hong, Jose Sánchez-Carazo, Peter Foley, Seong Jun Seo, Jérôme Msihid, Zhen Chen, Sonya L Cyr, Ana B Rossi

Abstract

Introduction: Dupilumab is approved as first-line systemic treatment for adults/adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Europe and elsewhere owing to its favourable benefit-risk profile. However, systemic non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS) are often used as first-line therapy in clinical practice. Impact of prior therapy with NSISS on dupilumab's treatment effect vs. control has not been described previously. This study assessed dupilumab's efficacy vs. control in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, comparing treatment effect in patients with/without prior systemic NSISS therapy, in four phase 3 trials.

Methods: This post hoc analysis included 1553 patients randomized to placebo or dupilumab (300 mg q2w) as monotherapy for 16 weeks, or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) for 16/52 weeks, from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Patients were stratified by prior use of systemic NSISS and dupilumab-treated patients were analysed against control groups (treated with placebo or placebo + TCS).

Results: Dupilumab-treated patients, regardless of prior treatment with NSISS, achieved a significantly higher percentage reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) vs. control; significantly more achieved EASI score ≤ 7, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale ≤ 4, POEM ≤ 7, and DLQI ≤ 5 by week 4. These rapid, significant improvements were seen with or without concomitant TCS and sustained through end-of-treatment.

Conclusions: Dupilumab treatment (monotherapy or + TCS) provides rapid, significant, sustained improvements in signs, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe AD compared with control, regardless of prior systemic NSISS use.

Clinical trial registration: LIBERTY AD SOLO 1: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02277743, EudraCT 2014-001198-15. LIBERTY AD SOLO 2: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02277769, EudraCT 2014-002619-40.

Liberty ad chronos: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02260986, EudraCT 2013-003254-24. LIBERTY AD CAFÉ: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02755649, EudraCT 2015-002653-35.

Keywords: Atopic dermatitis; Clinical trial; Dupilumab; Immunosuppressants.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Efficacy of short-term (16 weeks) dupilumab 300 mg q2w with concomitant TCS therapy for patients with atopic dermatitis with or without prior use of non-steroidal immunosuppressants (pooled analysis from CAFÉ and CHRONOS trials). a LS mean percentage change from baseline in EASI. b LS mean percentage change from baseline in SCORAD. c LS mean change from baseline in DLQI. d LS mean change from baseline in POEM. e Percentage of patients achieving ≥ 3-point improvement in Peak Pruritus NRS from baseline. *p < 0.05 vs. placebo; **p < 0.01 vs. placebo; ***p < 0.001 vs. placebo. AD atopic dermatitis, BL baseline, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, DPL dupilumab, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, ISS immunosuppressant, NSISS non-steroidal immunosuppressants, POEM Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, PP-NRS Peak Pruritus NRS, q2w every 2 weeks, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, SE standard error, TCS topical corticosteroids
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Efficacy of dupilumab 300 mg q2w monotherapy for atopic dermatitis patients with or without prior use of non-steroidal immunosuppressants (SOLO 1 & SOLO 2). a LS mean percentage change from baseline in EASI. b LS mean percentage change from baseline in SCORAD. c LS mean change from baseline in DLQI. d LS mean change from baseline in POEM. e Percentage of patients achieving ≥ 3-point improvement in Peak Pruritus NRS from baseline. *p < 0.05 vs. placebo; **p < 0.01 vs. placebo; ***p < 0.001 vs. placebo. AD atopic dermatitis, BL baseline, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, DPL dupilumab, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, ISS immunosuppressant, NSISS non-steroidal immunosuppressants, POEM Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, PP-NRS Peak Pruritus NRS, q2w every 2 weeks, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, SE standard error, TCS topical corticosteroids
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Clinically meaningful responses following dupilumab 300 mg q2w with concomitant TCS therapy over 52 weeks (CHRONOS) with or without prior use of non-steroidal immunosuppressants. a Percentage of patients achieving EASI score of ≤ 7. b Percentage of patients achieving Peak Pruritus NRS of ≤ 4. c Percentage of Patients achieving POEM score of ≤ 7. d Percentage of Patients achieving DLQI score of ≤ 5. *p < 0.05 vs. placebo; **p < 0.01 vs. placebo; ***p < 0.001 vs. placebo. AD atopic dermatitis, BL baseline, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, DPL dupilumab, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, ISS immunosuppressant, NSISS non-steroidal immunosuppressants, POEM Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, PP-NRS Peak Pruritus NRS, q2w every 2 weeks, TCS topical corticosteroids
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status following dupilumab 300 mg q2w with concomitant TCS therapy over 52 weeks (CHRONOS). Patients were asked: “Considering all the ways in which your eczema affects you, indicate how well you are doing” and rated on a 5-point scale. a Patients with 0 prior systemic NSISS use receiving placebo and TCS. b Patients with 0 prior systemic NSISS use receiving dupilumab and TCS. c Patients with at least one prior systemic NSISS use receiving placebo and TCS. d Patients with at least one prior systemic NSISS use receiving dupilumab and TCS. NSISS non-steroidal immunosuppressants, PGADS Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status, q2w every 2 weeks, TCS topical corticosteroids

References

    1. Weidinger S, Novak N. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1109–1122. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00149-X.
    1. Silverberg JI, Barbarot S, Gadkari A, et al. Atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population: a cross-sectional, international, epidemiologic study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(4):417–428.e2.
    1. Barbarot S, Auziere S, Gadkari A, et al. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: results from an international survey. Allergy. 2018;73(6):1284–1293. doi: 10.1111/all.13401.
    1. Gandhi NA, Bennett BL, Graham NM, Pirozzi P, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD. Targeting key proximal drivers of type 2 inflammation in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(1):35–50. doi: 10.1038/nrd4624.
    1. LePoidevin LM, Lee DE, Shi VY. A comparison of international management guidelines for atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019;36(1):36–65. doi: 10.1111/pde.13678.
    1. Furue M, Terao H, Moroi Y, et al. Dosage and adverse effects of topical tacrolimus and steroids in daily management of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2004;31(4):277–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00673.x.
    1. Furue M, Terao H, Rikihisa W, et al. Clinical dose and adverse effects of topical steroids in daily management of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(1):128–133. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.04934.x.
    1. Haeck IM, Rouwen TJ, Timmer-de Mik L, de Bruin-Weller MS, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA. Topical corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis and the risk of glaucoma and cataracts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(2):275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.01.035.
    1. Leung DY, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD, Nomura I, Hamid QA. New insights into atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(5):651–657. doi: 10.1172/JCI21060.
    1. Gerbens LAA, Apfelbacher CJ, Irvine AD, et al. TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: an international Delphi exercise to identify a core set of domains and domain items for national atopic eczema photo- and systemic therapy registries. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(4):790–801. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16714.
    1. Vermeulen FM, Gerbens LAA, Schmitt J, et al. The European TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce survey: prescribing practices in Europe for phototherapy and systemic therapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(6):1073–1082. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18959.
    1. Alexander H, Patton T, Jabbar-Lopez ZK, Manca A, Flohr C. Novel systemic therapies in atopic dermatitis: what do we need to fulfil the promise of a treatment revolution? F1000Res. 2019;8(F1000 Faculty Rev):132. 10.12688/f1000research.17039.1.
    1. Roekevisch E, Spuls PI, Kuester D, Limpens J, Schmitt J. Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(2):429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.049.
    1. de Bruin-Weller M, Pink AE, Patrizi A, et al. EUROSTAD prospective observational study: baseline characteristics, atopic dermatitis severity, and patient-reported outcomes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:P-161.
    1. Ryan C, Amor KT, Menter A. The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: part II. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(6):949–974. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.062.
    1. Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):327–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Assessment report for Sandimmun Neoral and associated names. 2013. . Accessed 18 Mar 2021.
    1. Berry W, Daniel BS, Baker C, Foley P. Real world experience using ciclosporin in psoriasis: efficacy and toxicity in the Australasian Psoriasis Registry. Australas J Dermatol. 2020;61(4):380–382. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13314.
    1. Busauschina A, Schnuelle P, van der Woude FJ. Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(2 Suppl):229S–S233. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.021.
    1. Boguniewicz M, Alexis AF, Beck LA, et al. Expert perspectives on management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a multidisciplinary consensus addressing current and emerging therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(6):1519–1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.005.
    1. Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Guttman-Yassky E, Ong PY, Silverberg J, Farrar JR. Atopic dermatitis yardstick: practical recommendations for an evolving therapeutic landscape. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120(1):10–22.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.10.039.
    1. Bruin-Weller M, Biedermann T, Bissonnette R, et al. Treat-to-target in atopic dermatitis: an international consensus on a set of core decision points for systemic therapies. Acta Dermato Venereolog. 2021;101(2):adv00402. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3751.
    1. Macdonald LE, Karow M, Stevens S, et al. Precise and in situ genetic humanization of 6 Mb of mouse immunoglobulin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(14):5147–5152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323896111.
    1. Murphy AJ, Macdonald LE, Stevens S, et al. Mice with megabase humanization of their immunoglobulin genes generate antibodies as efficiently as normal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(14):5153–5158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324022111.
    1. Gandhi NA, Pirozzi G, Graham NMH. Commonality of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway in atopic diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(5):425–437. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1298443.
    1. Armstrong A, Wei W, Garcia-Horton V, et al. Risk of contraindication and drug-drug interaction (DDI) with use of systemic immunosuppressants (IMMs) in adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(5):S41.
    1. Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab vs placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2335–2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610020.
    1. de Bruin-Weller M, Thaçi D, Smith CH, et al. Dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroid treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis with an inadequate response or intolerance to ciclosporin A or when this treatment is medically inadvisable: a placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial (LIBERTY AD CAFÉ) Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(5):1083–1101. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16156.
    1. Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M, et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2287–2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1.
    1. European Medicines Agency. DUPIXENT® (dupilumab). Summary of product characteristics. Available from: . Accessed 18 Mar 2021.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. DUPIXENT® (dupilumab). Highlights of prescribing information. . Accessed 18 Mar 2021.
    1. Drucker A, Wang A, Li W, Sevetson E, Block JK, Qureshi AA. The burden of atopic dermatitis: summary of a report for the National Eczema Association. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.012.
    1. Lifschitz C. The impact of atopic dermatitis on quality of life. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(Suppl 1):34–40. doi: 10.1159/000370226.
    1. Ariëns LFM, Gadkari A, van Os-Medendorp H, et al. Dupilumab vs cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults: indirect comparison using the Eczema Area and Severity Index. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(10):851–857. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3219.
    1. Jang DH, Heo SJ, Jung HJ, Park MY, Seo SJ, Ahn JY. Retrospective study of dupilumab treatment for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in Korea: efficacy and safety of dupilumab in real-world practice. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1982. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061982.
    1. Ariëns LF, van der Schaft J, Spekhorst LS, et al. Dupilumab shows long-term effectiveness in a large cohort of treatment-refractory atopic dermatitis patients in daily practice: 52-weeks results from the Dutch BioDay registry. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(4):1000–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.127.
    1. Spekhorst LS, Ariëns LFM, van der Schaft J, et al. Two-year drug survival of dupilumab in a large cohort of difficult-to-treat adult atopic dermatitis patients compared to cyclosporine A and methotrexate: results from the BioDay registry. Allergy. 2020;75(9):2376–2379. doi: 10.1111/all.14324.
    1. Fargnoli MC, Esposito M, Ferrucci S, et al. Real-life experience on effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019. 10.1080/09546634.2019.1682503.
    1. Giavina-Bianchi M, Rizzo L, Giavina-Bianchi P. Severe atopic dermatitis: Dupilumab is not just safer, but more efficient. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020;48(6):792–797. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2019.12.005.
    1. Ferrucci S, Casazza G, Angileri L, et al. Clinical response and quality of life in patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab: a single-center real-life experience. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):791. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030791.
    1. Beck LA, Thaçi D, Deleuran M, et al. Dupilumab provides favorable safety and sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in an open-label study of adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(4):567–577. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00527-x.
    1. Merola JF, Sidbury R, Wollenberg A, et al. Dupilumab prevents flares in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a 52-week randomized controlled phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(2):495–497. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.003.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa