Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Standardization of Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) in Iranian Children

Roshanak Vameghi, Firoozeh Sajedi, Adis Kraskian Mojembari, Abbas Habiollahi, Hamid Reza Lornezhad, Bahram Delavar, Roshanak Vameghi, Firoozeh Sajedi, Adis Kraskian Mojembari, Abbas Habiollahi, Hamid Reza Lornezhad, Bahram Delavar

Abstract

Background: To provide the validated and standardized form of the Persian version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires as an appropriate developmental screening tool for evaluation of Iranian children's development.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Translation and back-translation, content validity determination, cultural and lingual modifications, pilot study on 100 parents and inter-rater reliability determinations were performed, respectively. The national and final stage was carried out 11000, 4-60 month-old children in selected cities throughout the country in order to determine the validity, standard deviation, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and mean scores points of the test.

Results: The reliability, determined by cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 and the inter-rater reliability was 0.93. The validity determined by factor analysis was satisfactory. The mean scores of Iranian children were identified and compared with those of the normative sample as well as with three other populations of children. The developmental status of Iranian children was higher in the communication, problem-solving and personal-social domains, especially under the age of 24 months, after which their developmental status seems to deteriorate, especially in the motor domains.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the ASQ has appropriate validity and reliability for screening developmental disorders in Iran.

Keywords: Child; Developmental delay; Screening tools; Standardization; Validity.

References

    1. Rydz D, srour M, Oskoui M, Marget N, Shiller M, Birnbaum R, et al. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatr. 2006;118:1178.
    1. Spittle AJ, Orton J, Doyle LW, Boyd R. Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2007;18(2):CD005495.
    1. Buschmann A, Jooss B, Rupp A, Dockter S, Blachtikowitz H, Heggen I, et al. Children with developmental language delay at 24 months of age: results of a diagnostic work-up. Dev Med child Neurol. 2008;50:223–9.
    1. Nelson HD, Nygren P, Walker M, Panoscha R. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatr. 2006;117:298–319.
    1. McCormick MC, Brooks-Gunn J, Buka SL, Goldman J, Yu J, Salganik M, et al. Early intervention in low birth weight premature infants: results at 18 years of age for the Infant Health and Development program. Pediatr. 2006;117:771–80.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children With Disabilities; Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics; Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for children with special Needs Project Advisory committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatr. 2006;118:405–420.
    1. Tsai HLA, McCleilopd MM, Pratt C, Squires J. Adaptation of the 36-Month Ages and Stages Questionnaire in Taiwan: Results from a Preliminary Study. J Early Interv. 2006;28:213.
    1. Glascoe FP. Evidence-based approach to developmental and behavioral surveillance using parents’ concerns. Child Care Health Dev. 2000;26(2):137–149.
    1. Glascoe FP. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:173–179.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Children with Disabilities Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatr. 2001;108:192–196.
    1. Glascoe FP. The value of parents’ concerns to detect and address developmental and behavioural problems. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999;35:1–8.
    1. Glascoe FP. Parents’ evaluation of developmental status: how well do parents’ concerns identify children with behavioral and emotional problems? Clin Pediatr. 2003;42:133–138.
    1. Rydz D, Shevell MI, Majnemer A, Oskoui M. Developmental screening. J Child Neurol. 2005;20:4–21.
    1. Squires J, Katzev A, Jenkins F. Early screening for developmental delays: Use of parent-completed questionnaires in Oregon’s Healthy Start Program. Early Child Dev Care. 2002;172(3):275–282.
    1. Squires J, Potter L, Bricker D. The ASQ user’s guide. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 1999.
    1. Squires J. Identifying social/emotional and behavioral problems in infants and toddlers. Infant-Toddler Intervention. 2000;10(2):107–119.
    1. Kerstjens JM, Bos AF, Vergert EMJ, Meer G, Butcher PR, Reijneveld SA. Support for the global feasibility of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire as developmental screener. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:443–447.
    1. Elbers J, Macnab A, McLeod E, Gagnon F. The Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Feasibility of use as a screening tool for children in Canada. Can J Rural Med. 2008;13(10):9–14.
    1. Klamer A, Lando A, Pinborg A, Greisen G. Ages and Stages Questionnaire used to measure cognitive deficit in children born extremely preterm. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:1327–1329.
    1. Richter J, Janson H. A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Ages and stages Questionnaires. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(5):748–752.
    1. Heo KH, Squires J, Yovanoff P. Cross-cultural adaptation of a pre-school screening instrument: comparison of Korean and U.S. populations. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52:195–206.
    1. Kapci EG, Kucuker S, Uslu RI. How Applicable Are Ages and Stages Questionnaires for Use with Turkish children? Topics Early Child Spec Educ. 2010;30(3):176–188. 10–23.
    1. Janson H, Squires J. Parent completed developmental screening in a Norwegian population sample: A comparison with U.S normative data. Acta Padiatr. 2004;93(11):1525–1529.
    1. Reyes A, Pacifico R, Benitez B, Villanueva-Uy E, Lam H, Ostrea EM., Jr Use of the Griffiths Mental Development Scales in an agro-industrial province in the Philippines. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:354–360.
    1. Black MM, Hess CR, Brenson-Howard J. Toddlers from low-income families have below normal mental, motor, and behavior scores on the revised Bayley Scales. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2000;21(6):655–666.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa