Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients-a randomized clinical trial

Christopher Adlbrecht, Raphael Wurm, Pieter Depuydt, Herbert Spapen, Jose A Lorente, Thomas Staudinger, Jacques Creteur, Christian Zauner, Andreas Meier-Hellmann, Philipp Eller, Margot Vander Laenen, Zsolt Molnár, István Várkonyi, Bernhard Schaaf, Mária Héjja, Vladimír Šrámek, Hauke Schneider, Niranjan Kanesa-Thasan, Susanne Eder-Lingelbach, Anton Klingler, Katrin Dubischar, Nina Wressnigg, Jordi Rello, Christopher Adlbrecht, Raphael Wurm, Pieter Depuydt, Herbert Spapen, Jose A Lorente, Thomas Staudinger, Jacques Creteur, Christian Zauner, Andreas Meier-Hellmann, Philipp Eller, Margot Vander Laenen, Zsolt Molnár, István Várkonyi, Bernhard Schaaf, Mária Héjja, Vladimír Šrámek, Hauke Schneider, Niranjan Kanesa-Thasan, Susanne Eder-Lingelbach, Anton Klingler, Katrin Dubischar, Nina Wressnigg, Jordi Rello

Abstract

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a serious threat in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this confirmatory, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2/3 study was to assess the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in non-surgical ICU patients.

Methods: Eight hundred patients aged 18 to 80 years admitted to the ICU with expected need for mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h were randomized 1:1 to either IC43 100 μg or saline placebo, given in two vaccinations 7 days apart. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality in patients 28 days after the first vaccination. Immunogenicity and safety were also evaluated.

Findings: All-cause mortality rates at day 28 were 29.2% vs 27.7% in the IC43 and placebo groups, respectively (P = .67). Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, P = .46) and proportion of patients with ≥ one confirmed P. aeruginosa invasive infection or respiratory tract infection also did not differ significantly between both groups. The geometric mean fold increase in OprF/I titers was 1.5 after the first vaccination, 20 at day 28, after the second vaccination, and 2.9 at day 180. Significantly more patients in the placebo group (96.5%) had ≥ one adverse event (AE) versus the IC43 100 μg group (93.1%) (P = .04). The most frequently reported severe AEs in the IC43 and placebo groups were respiratory failure (6.9% vs 5.7%, respectively), septic shock (4.1% vs 6.5%), cardiac arrest (4.3% vs 5.7%), multiorgan failure (4.6% vs 5.5%), and sepsis (4.6% vs 4.2%). No related serious AEs were reported in the IC43 group.

Interpretation: The IC43 100 μg vaccine was well tolerated in this large population of medically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. The vaccine achieved high immunogenicity but provided no clinical benefit over placebo in terms of overall mortality.

Trial registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01563263" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT01563263). Registration was sent to ClinicalTrials.gov on March 14, 2012, but posted by ClinicalTrials.gov on March 26, 2012. The first subject was included in the trial on March 22, 2012.

Keywords: Intensive care; Mechanical ventilation; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Vaccination.

Conflict of interest statement

SE, KD, and NW are Valneva employees and own stock and share options in Valneva. NK was an employee of GSK during the study and now serves as a consultant to Valneva. JR and CA have received honorary as consultants for the sponsor. CA, RW, PD, HS, JAL, TS, JC, CZ, AMH, PE, MVL, ZM, IV, BS, MH, VŠ, HS and JR received research funding for the trial from the sponsor.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
All-cause mortality (intent-to-treat population). aIC43 100 μg versus placebo
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall survival: Kaplan-Meier curves by treatment group (intent-to-treat population). Arrows depict vaccination time points. Numbers reflect a number of subjects at risk. + Symbols denote censored patients

References

    1. Ewans T. Prevention and control of nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit. 4. New York: Lippincot-Ravan; Irwin and Rippe’s intensive care medicine - NLM Catalog - NCBI; 1999.
    1. Saviteer SM, Samsa GP, Rutala WA. Nosocomial infections in the elderly. Increased risk per hospital day. Am J Med. 1988;84:661–666. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90101-5.
    1. Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS, Christman JW, Prince AS. Pathogen–host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:1209–1223. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200408-1044SO.
    1. Yum H-K, Park I-N, Shin B-M, Choi S-J. Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in chronic lung diseases: relapse or reinfection? Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2014;77:172. doi: 10.4046/trd.2014.77.4.172.
    1. Morrison Allan J., Wenzel Richard P. Epidemiology of Infections Due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1984;6(Supplement_3):S627–S642. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.Supplement_3.S627.
    1. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470–485. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.10.001.
    1. Park DR. The microbiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Care. 2005;50:742–763.
    1. Porzecanski I, Bowton DL. Diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2006;130:597–604. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.2.597.
    1. Rello J, Ramirez Estrada S, Borgatta B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia management. Infect Drug Resist. 2016;9:7. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S50669.
    1. Rello J, Ausina V, Ricart M, et al. Risk factors for infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(3):193–198. doi: 10.1007/BF01704699.
    1. Priebe GP, Goldberg JB. Vaccines for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a long and winding road. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014;13:507–519. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.890053.
    1. Campfield B, Chen K, Kolls JK. Vaccine approaches for multidrug resistant gram negative infections. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;28:84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.02.002.
    1. Rello J, Krenn C-G, Locker G, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of a Pseudomonas vaccine in ventilated ICU patients. Crit Care. 2017;21:22. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1601-9.
    1. Westritschnig K, Hochreiter R, Wallner G, Firbas C, Schwameis M, Jilma B. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase I study assessing the safety and immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hybrid outer membrane protein OprF/I vaccine (IC43) in healthy volunteers. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10:170–183. doi: 10.4161/hv.26565.
    1. Mansouri E, Gabelsberger J, Knapp B, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hybrid outer membrane protein F-I vaccine in human volunteers. Infect Immun. 1999;67:1461–1470. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.3.1461-1470.1999.
    1. Suetens C, Morales I, Savey A, et al. European surveillance of ICU-acquired infections (HELICS-ICU): methods and main results. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65:171–173. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60038-3.
    1. Kollef MH, Chastre J, Fagon J-Y, et al. Global prospective epidemiologic and surveillance study of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2178–2187. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000510.
    1. Borgatta B, Lagunes L, Imbiscuso AT, Larrosa MN, Lujàn M, Rello J. Infections in intensive care unit adult patients harboring multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: implications for prevention and therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:1097–1104. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2894-3.
    1. Lemiale V, Mokart D, Resche-Rigon M, et al. Effect of noninvasive ventilation vs oxygen therapy on mortality among immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure. JAMA. 2015;314:1711. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12402.
    1. Hoang S, Georget A, Asselineau J, et al. Risk factors for colonization and infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients hospitalized in intensive care units in France. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193300.
    1. Rello J, Jubert P, Vallés J, Artigas A, et al. Evaluation of outcome for intubated patients with pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23(5):973–978. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.5.973.
    1. Rello J, Rué M, Jubert P, Muses G, et al. Survival in patients with nosocomial pneumonia: impact of the severity of illness and the etiologic agent. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(11):1862–1867. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00026.
    1. Opal SM, Dellinger RP, Vincent J-L, Masur H, Angus DC. The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1714–1721. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000325.
    1. Dimopoulos G, Akova M, Rello J, et al. Understanding resistance in Pseudomonas. Intensive Care Med. 2020.
    1. Sakr Y, Moreira CL, Rhodes A, et al. The impact of hospital and ICU organizational factors on outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:519–526. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000754.
    1. Fowler VG, Allen KB, Moreira ED, et al. Effect of an investigational vaccine for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections after cardiothoracic surgery. JAMA. 2013;309:1368. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3010.
    1. Dimopoulos G, Akova M, Rello J, et al. Understanding resistance in Pseudomonas. Intensive Care Med. 2019; Epub Ahead of Print.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa