Challenges of Implementing an Individual Randomized Controlled Trial (Women First: Preconception Maternal Nutrition Study) in a Rural Study Site: A Case Study From Pakistan

Sumera Aziz Ali, Umber Khan, Farina Abrejo, Sarah Saleem, Michael K Hambidge, Nancy F Krebs, Jamie E Westcott, Robert L Goldenberg, Elizabeth M McClure, Omrana Pasha, Sumera Aziz Ali, Umber Khan, Farina Abrejo, Sarah Saleem, Michael K Hambidge, Nancy F Krebs, Jamie E Westcott, Robert L Goldenberg, Elizabeth M McClure, Omrana Pasha

Abstract

Persistent global disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with poor maternal nutrition provided the genesis of the Women First (WF) study, an individually randomized controlled trial on preconceptional maternal nutrition. This article describes the challenges that arose in implementing this trial related to nutrition or diet of the mother, in District Thatta-Pakistan. During different phases of the study, we encountered problems in identifying the eligible participants, taking consent from couples, randomizing participants in different arms, conducting biweekly follow-up visits on time, ensuring compliance to the intervention, and measuring the primary outcome within the 24 hours of birth. Each challenge was itself an opportunity for the research team to address the same through effective coordination and teamwork. Moreover, with adequate resources and dedicated staff with diverse backgrounds, it was possible to implement the WF study across the widely scattered geographic clusters of District Thatta. In addition, there are some broad strategies that could be applied to other studies such as very close contact either in person or at least by talking to mothers via phones and rapport with the study participants, the study leadership of country coordinator and the field supervisors to build trust between those on front lines and the study leadership. Moreover, continuous monitoring and supervision with frequent training and refreshers were also found to be more important to assure the data quality and to meet the study targets. Community meetings were also found to be very helpful and effective to follow the participants for a long time. Researchers conducting a similar type of studies particularly in rural areas can learn many lessons from such experiences. Thus, the process of implementing the study in one of the rural areas of Pakistan provides an insight into where and how similar individual randomized trials might be deployed.

Keywords: case study; challenges; rural Pakistan; strategies.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Organogram of Women First study in District Thatta Pakistan.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Geographic distribution of WF study sites in District Thatta Pakistan.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Flyer, distributed in the communities at the inception of the trial.

References

    1. Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Westcott JE, et al. Preconception maternal nutrition: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:111.
    1. Goudar SS, Carlo WA, McClure EM, et al. The maternal and newborn health registry study of the global network for women’s and children’s health research. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118:190–193.
    1. Bose CL, Bauserman M, Goldenberg RL, et al. The Global Network Maternal Newborn Health Registry: a multi-national, community-based registry of pregnancy outcomes. Reprod Health. 2015;12:S1.
    1. NoorAli R, Luby S, Rahbar MH. Does use of a government service depend on distance from the health facility? Health Policy Plan. 1999;14:191–197.
    1. Akmal Hussain A.R, Kemal AIH, Imran Ali, Mumtaz Khawar, Qutub Ayub. Poverty, Growth and Governance: Pakistan National Human Development Report Karachi, Pakistan: 2003.
    1. Memon A, Naz S, Abbas H, Zahid J, Tabbasum R, Zeshan M. Alif Ailaan Pakistan District Education Rankings 2014. Alif Ailan. 2014.
    1. Pasha O, Saleem S, Ali S, et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes in Pakistan compared to other low and middle income countries in the Global Network’s Maternal Newborn Health Registry: an active, community-based, pregnancy surveillance mechanism. Reproductive health. 2015;12(2):S15.
    1. Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Garcés A, et al. Anthropometric indices for non-pregnant women of childbearing age differ widely among four low-middle income populations. BMC public health. 2018;18(1):45.
    1. Population Council. Family Advancement for Life and Health (FALAH): Thatta Baseline Household Survey. Islamabad, Pakistan: USADI; 2009.
    1. Swanson D, Lokangaka A, Bauserman M, et al. Challenges of implementing antenatal ultrasound screening in a rural study site: a case study from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2017;5(2):315–324.
    1. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42:533–544.
    1. Ali SA, Saleem S, Sami N, et al. Geographic access to working family planning centers and unintended pregnancies among married women: a community based nested case control study. Open J Epidemiol. 2016;6:95–108.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa