Comprehensive population-wide analysis of Lynch syndrome in Iceland reveals founder mutations in MSH6 and PMS2

Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, Thorunn Rafnar, Wendy L Frankel, Sylvia Einarsdottir, Asgeir Sigurdsson, Heather Hampel, Petur Snaebjornsson, Gisli Masson, Daniel Weng, Reynir Arngrimsson, Birte Kehr, Ahmet Yilmaz, Stefan Haraldsson, Patrick Sulem, Tryggvi Stefansson, Peter G Shields, Fridbjorn Sigurdsson, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Pall H Moller, Margret Steinarsdottir, Kristin Alexiusdottir, Megan Hitchins, Colin C Pritchard, Albert de la Chapelle, Jon G Jonasson, Richard M Goldberg, Kari Stefansson, Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, Thorunn Rafnar, Wendy L Frankel, Sylvia Einarsdottir, Asgeir Sigurdsson, Heather Hampel, Petur Snaebjornsson, Gisli Masson, Daniel Weng, Reynir Arngrimsson, Birte Kehr, Ahmet Yilmaz, Stefan Haraldsson, Patrick Sulem, Tryggvi Stefansson, Peter G Shields, Fridbjorn Sigurdsson, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Pall H Moller, Margret Steinarsdottir, Kristin Alexiusdottir, Megan Hitchins, Colin C Pritchard, Albert de la Chapelle, Jon G Jonasson, Richard M Goldberg, Kari Stefansson

Abstract

Lynch syndrome, caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes, is associated with increased cancer risk. Here using a large whole-genome sequencing data bank, cancer registry and colorectal tumour bank we determine the prevalence of Lynch syndrome, associated cancer risks and pathogenicity of several variants in the Icelandic population. We use colorectal cancer samples from 1,182 patients diagnosed between 2000-2009. One-hundred and thirty-two (11.2%) tumours are mismatch repair deficient per immunohistochemistry. Twenty-one (1.8%) have Lynch syndrome while 106 (9.0%) have somatic hypermethylation or mutations in the mismatch repair genes. The population prevalence of Lynch syndrome is 0.442%. We discover a translocation disrupting MLH1 and three mutations in MSH6 and PMS2 that increase endometrial, colorectal, brain and ovarian cancer risk. We find thirteen mismatch repair variants of uncertain significance that are not associated with cancer risk. We find that founder mutations in MSH6 and PMS2 prevail in Iceland unlike most other populations.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors from deCODE are employees of the biotechnology company deCODE genetics, a subsidiary of AMGEN. Ms Heather Hampel has received research support from Myriad Genetic Laboratories and is on the clinical advisory board for Invitae Genetics. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1. Novel MLH1 translocation.
Figure 1. Novel MLH1 translocation.
(a) The top half of the figure displays enlarged GRCh38 reference sequences from within MLH1 on chromosome 3 (blue) and from the reverse complement of chromosome 5 within ZCCHC10 (red) in a patient with CRC with MLH1/PMS2 absent on IHC. The bottom shows the translocation breakpoints observed in the sequencing data. The translocation connects an intron of MLH1 with an intron of ZCCHC10 in sense of the genes' orientations. At the breakpoint, a 3-bp duplication is present on both translocation haplotypes (dark blue), a 5-bp deletion is missing from both translocation haplotypes (dark red), and a 10-bp motif from nearby got inserted in reverse complemented orientation into one of the translocation haplotypes (yellow). (b) FISH, chromosome 3 (red CY3), chromosome 5 (green fitc). Chromosomes 3 and 5 are marked with white arrows. The scale shown is 5 μm. (c) Family tree with cancers and age at diagnosis. Proband is indicated with an arrow.
Figure 2. Study design.
Figure 2. Study design.
CRC, colorectal cancer; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LS, Lynch syndrome; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.

References

    1. Hampel H. & de la Chapelle A. How do we approach the goal of identifying everybody with Lynch Syndrome? Fam. Cancer 12, 313–317 (2013).
    1. Watson P. & Lynch H. T. The tumor spectrum in HNPCC. Anticancer Res. 14, 1635–1639 (1994).
    1. Bonadona V. et al.. Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in mlh1, msh2, and msh6 genes in lynch syndrome. JAMA 305, 2304–2310 (2011).
    1. ten Broeke S. W. et al.. Lynch syndrome caused by germline PMS2 mutations: delineating the cancer risk. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 319–325 (2015).
    1. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487, 330–337 (2012).
    1. Hampel H. et al.. Screening for the Lynch syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer). New Engl. J. Med 352, 1851–1860 (2005).
    1. Kane M. F. et al.. Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 57, 808–811 (1997).
    1. Haraldsdottir S et al.. Colon and endometrial cancers with mismatch repair deficiency can arise from somatic, rather than germline, mutations. Gastroenterology 147, 1308–1316.e1 (2014).
    1. de la Chapelle A. Inherited human diseases: victories, challenges, disappointments. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 236–240 (2003).
    1. Vasen H. F. A. et al.. Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts. Gut 62, 812–823 (2013).
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Colon Cancer (Version 1) (2017). Available at: (accessed 24 Feburary 2017).
    1. Giardiello F. M. et al.. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 147, 502–526 (2014).
    1. Palomaki G. E., McClain M. R., Melillo S., Hampel H. L. & Thibodeau S. N. EGAPP supplementary evidence review: DNA testing strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome. Genet. Med. 11, 42–65 (2009).
    1. Thompson B. A. et al.. Application of a 5-tiered scheme for standardized classification of 2,360 unique mismatch repair gene variants in the InSiGHT locus-specific database. Nat. Genet. 46, 107–115 (2014).
    1. Gudbjartsson D. F. et al.. Large-scale whole-genome sequencing of the Icelandic population. Nat. Genet. 47, 435–444 (2015).
    1. Landrum M. J. et al.. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucl. Acids Res 44, D862–D868 (2016).
    1. Clendenning M. et al.. A frame-shift mutation of PMS2 is a widespread cause of Lynch syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 45, 340–345 (2008).
    1. Engholm G. et al.. NORDCAN: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 7.2 (16 December 2015). (Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries Danish Cancer Society, 2016). Available at: (accessed 01 January 2016)..
    1. Aaltonen L. A. et al.. Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. New Engl. J. Med 338, 1481–1487 (1998).
    1. Ravnik-Glavac M., Potocnik U. & Glavac D. Incidence of germline hMLH1 andhMSH2 mutations (HNPCC patients) among newly diagnosed colorectal cancers in a Slovenian population. J. Med. Genet. 37, 533–536 (2000).
    1. Percesepe A. et al.. Molecular screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a prospective, population-based study. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 3944–3950 (2001).
    1. Piñol V. et al.. Accuracy of revised bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. JAMA 293, 1986–1994 (2005).
    1. Berginc G., Bračko M., Ravnik-Glavač M. & Glavač D. Screening for germline mutations of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 genes in Slovenian colorectal cancer patients: implications for a population specific detection strategy of Lynch syndrome. Fam. Cancer 8, 421–429 (2009).
    1. Ponti G., Castellsagué E., Ruini C., Percesepe A. & Tomasi A. Mismatch repair genes founder mutations and cancer susceptibility in Lynch syndrome. Clin. Genet. 87, 507–516 (2015).
    1. Moisio A. L., Sistonen P., Weissenbach J., de la Chapelle A. & Peltomäki P. Age and origin of two common MLH1 mutations predisposing to hereditary colon cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 1243–1251 (1996).
    1. Ramsoekh D. et al.. A high incidence of MSH6 mutations in Amsterdam criteria II-negative families tested in a diagnostic setting. Gut 57, 1539–1544 (2008).
    1. Cederquist K. et al.. Mutation analysis of the MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 genes in patients with double primary cancers of the colorectum and the endometrium: a population-based study in northern Sweden. Int. J. Cancer 109, 370–376 (2004).
    1. Roth R. M. et al.. A modified Lynch syndrome screening algorithm in colon cancer: BRAF immunohistochemistry is efficacious and cost beneficial. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 143, 336–343 (2015).
    1. Kong A. et al.. Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation. Nat. Genet. 40, 1068–1075 (2008).
    1. Kong A. et al.. Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature 462, 868–874 (2009).
    1. McKenna A. et al.. The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
    1. Bulik-Sullivan B. K. et al.. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).
    1. Kutyavin I. V. et al.. A novel endonuclease IV post-PCR genotyping system. Nucl. Acids Res 34, e128–e128 (2006).
    1. Rooney D. E. inHuman Cytogenetics, Constitutional Analysis Vol. 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001)..
    1. Pritchard C. C. et al.. ColoSeq provides comprehensive Lynch and Polyposis syndrome mutational analysis using massively parallel sequencing. J. Mol. Diagn. 14, 357–366 (2012).
    1. Salipante S. J., Scroggins S. M., Hampel H. L., Turner E. H. & Pritchard C. C. Microsatellite instability detection by next generation sequencing. Clin. Chem. 60, 1192–1199 (2014).
    1. Titze S. et al.. Differential MSH2 promoter methylation in blood cells of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 18, 81–87 (2010).
    1. Hitchins M. P. et al.. Identification of new cases of early-onset colorectal cancer with an MLH1 epimutation in an ethnically diverse South African cohort. Clin. Genet. 80, 428–434 (2011).

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa