Randomized trial of surveillance with abbreviated MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer- impact on patient anxiety and cancer detection

Marina Mohallem Fonseca, Tasneem Alhassan, Yashmin Nisha, Diana Koszycki, Betty Anne Schwarz, Roanne Segal, Angel Arnaout, Tim Ramsay, Jacqueline Lau, Jean M Seely, Marina Mohallem Fonseca, Tasneem Alhassan, Yashmin Nisha, Diana Koszycki, Betty Anne Schwarz, Roanne Segal, Angel Arnaout, Tim Ramsay, Jacqueline Lau, Jean M Seely

Abstract

Background: Abbreviated breast MRI (A-MRI) substantially reduces the image acquisition and reading times and has been reported to have similar diagnostic accuracy as a full diagnostic protocol but has not been evaluated prospectively with respect to impact on psychological distress in women with a prior history of breast cancer (PHBC). This study aimed to determine if surveillance mammography (MG) plus A-MRI reduced psychological distress and if A-MRI improved cancer detection rates (CDR) as compared to MG alone.

Methods: This prospective controlled trial of parallel design was performed at a tertiary cancer center on asymptomatic women with PHBC who were randomized into two groups: routine surveillance with MG or intervention of MG plus A-MRI in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcome was anxiety measured by four validated questionnaires at three different time-points during the study. Other parameters including CDR and positive predictive value for biopsy (PPV3) were compared between imaging modalities of MG and A-MRI. Tissue diagnoses or 1 year of follow-up were used to establish the reference standard. Linear mixed models were used to analyze anxiety measures and Fisher's exact test to compare imaging outcomes.

Results: One hundred ninety-eight patients were allocated to either MG alone (94) or MG plus A-MRI (104). No significant group difference emerged for improvement in trait anxiety, worry and perceived health status (all Time-by-surveillance group interaction ps > .05). There was some advantage of A-MRI in reducing state anxiety at Time 2 (p < .05). Anxiety scores in all questionnaires were similarly elevated in both groups (50.99 ± 4.6 with MG alone vs 51.73 ± 2.56 with MG plus A-MRI, p > 0.05) and did not change over time. A-MRI detected 5 invasive cancers and 1 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and MG detected 1 DCIS. A-MRI had higher incremental CDR (48/1000(5/104) vs MG 5/1000(1/198, p = 0.01)) and higher biopsy rates (19.2% (20/104) vs MG 2.1% (2/94), p < 0.00001) with no difference in PPV3 (A-MRI 28.6% (6/21) vs MG 16.7% (1/6, p > .05).

Conclusion: There was no significant impact of A-MRI to patient anxiety or perceived health status. Compared to MG alone, A-MRI had significantly higher incremental cancer detection in PHBC. Despite a higher rate of biopsies, A-MRI had no demonstrable impact on anxiety, worry, and perceived health status.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02244593 ). Prospectively registered on Sept. 14, 2014.

Keywords: Abbreviated; Anxiety; Breast cancer; MRI; Mammography.

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declare(s) that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT Flow diagram of trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Woman (60–70 years old) with PHBC treated by right mastectomy 12 years prior to study. A MLO and B CC Left surveillance mammograms show heterogeneously dense breast tissue (BI-RADS C) with normal, stable findings. C Axial 3D MIP at 2 min post contrast performed after mammograms shows right mastectomy with no chest wall abnormalities and an irregular 4.5 cm enhancing mass (circle) in the medial left breast reported as BI-RADS 4B. The second circumscribed mass in the lateral breast corresponded with a benign fibroadenoma (arrow). D Axial 2 min post contrast subtracted image demonstrates the spiculated enhancing mass in the upper medial quadrant of the left breast (circle). E Axial image from MRI biopsy demonstrates the needle sampling the mass (circle), diagnostic for pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ, which was confirmed at surgical excision to be associated with invasive lobular carcinoma

References

    1. Bredart A, Kop JL, Fall M, et al. Anxiety and specific distress in women at intermediate and high risk of breast cancer before and after surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging and mammography versus standard mammography. Psychooncology. 2012;21:1185–1194. doi: 10.1002/pon.2025.
    1. Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:771–784. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8.
    1. Pedersen RN, Esen BO, Mellemkjaer L, et al. The Incidence of Breast Cancer Recurrence 10–32 Years After Primary Diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:391–399. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab202.
    1. Brewster AM, Hortobagyi GN, Broglio KR, et al. Residual risk of breast cancer recurrence 5 years after adjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1179–1183. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn233.
    1. Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, et al. 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1836–1846. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701830.
    1. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011;260:658–663. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110469.
    1. Coldman A, Phillips N, Wilson C, et al. Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):dju261. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju261.
    1. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002;95:458–469. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765.
    1. Lu WLJL, Post WJ, Bonnema J, Van de Velde JC, De Bock GH. Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(3):403–12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4.
    1. Houssami NAL, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Geller BM, Muss HB, Irwig L. Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 2011;305(8):790–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.188.
    1. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–3258. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108.
    1. Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:408–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.034.
    1. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2304–2310. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5386.
    1. Do WSWJ, McGregor HF, Forte DM, Sheldon RR, Sohn VY. Poor compliance despite equal access: Military experience with screening breast MRI in high risk women. Am J Surg. 2019;217(5):843–847. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.021.
    1. Mango VL, Morris EA, David Dershaw D, et al. Abbreviated protocol for breast MRI: are multiple sequences needed for cancer detection? Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.004.
    1. Grimm LJ, Soo MS, Yoon S, Kim C, Ghate SV, Johnson KS. Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI: a feasibility study. Acad Radiol. 2015;22:1157–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.06.004.
    1. Harvey SC, Di Carlo PA, Lee B, Obadina E, Sippo D, Mullen L. An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.08.015.
    1. Heacock L, Melsaether AN, Heller SL, et al. Evaluation of a known breast cancer using an abbreviated breast MRI protocol: Correlation of imaging characteristics and pathology with lesion detection and conspicuity. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:815–823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.005.
    1. Moschetta M, Telegrafo M, Rella L, Stabile Ianora AA, Angelelli G. Abbreviated Combined MR Protocol: A New Faster Strategy for Characterizing Breast Lesions. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016;16:207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.008.
    1. Rijnsburger AJ, Essink-Bot ML, van Dooren S, et al. Impact of screening for breast cancer in high-risk women on health-related quality of life. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:69–76. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601912.
    1. Lee AJ, Cunningham AP, Kuchenbaecker KB, et al. BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:535–545. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.730.
    1. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
    1. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
    1. Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28:487–495. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.
    1. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol. 1991;10:259–267. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.10.4.259.
    1. Barry TL, Kaiser KL, Atwood JR. Reliability, validity, and scoring of the Health Status Questionnaire-12 version 20. J Nurs Meas. 2007;15:24–35. doi: 10.1891/106137407780851778.
    1. Keyzer-Dekker CM, de Vries J, Mertens MC, Roukema JA, van der Steeg AF. Cancer or no cancer: the influence of trait anxiety and diagnosis on quality of life with breast cancer and benign disease: a prospective, longitudinal study. World J Surg. 2013;37:2140–2147. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2088-4.
    1. Millar K, Jelicic M, Bonke B, Asbury AJ. Assessment of preoperative anxiety: comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:180–183. doi: 10.1093/bja/74.2.180.
    1. Ontario Demographic Quarterly: Highlights of first quarter. Learn about key facts and figures of the province's demographics for the first quarter of 2021, Ontario government publications, Updated: September 22, 2021. Published: June 23, 2020, last accesssed July 3, 2022. .
    1. R.A L, Rubin GD. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Second Edition ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Inc, 2002, in Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
    1. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Pinder SE, et al. Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:21–29. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70266-7.
    1. Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707–1716. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2.
    1. Chen SQ, Huang M, Shen YY, Liu CL, Xu CX. Abbreviated MRI Protocols for Detecting Breast Cancer in Women with Dense Breasts. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18:470–475. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.470.
    1. Choi BH, Choi N, Kim MY, Yang JH, Yoo YB, Jung HK. Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167:495–502. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4530-z.
    1. Petrillo A, Fusco R, Sansone M, et al. Abbreviated breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for lesion detection and characterization: the experience of an Italian oncologic center. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:401–410. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4264-y.
    1. Park KW, Han SB, Han BK, et al. MRI surveillance for women with a personal history of breast cancer: comparison between abbreviated and full diagnostic protocol. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20190733. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190733.
    1. Lukaszewicz A, Lamb L, Healey P, Alie E, Seely J. RC215-04 Breast Imaging and Interventional Abstract: Abbreviated Screening Breast MRI Protocol: Impact on Cancer Detection and Biopsy Rates. RSNA 2019 105th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Dec 1-6, McCormick Place, Chicago, USA. .

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa