Anti-Siglec-8 Antibody for Eosinophilic Gastritis and Duodenitis

Evan S Dellon, Kathryn A Peterson, Joseph A Murray, Gary W Falk, Nirmala Gonsalves, Mirna Chehade, Robert M Genta, John Leung, Paneez Khoury, Amy D Klion, Sabine Hazan, Michael Vaezi, Adam C Bledsoe, Sandy R Durrani, Chao Wang, Camilla Shaw, Alan T Chang, Bhupinder Singh, Amol P Kamboj, Henrik S Rasmussen, Marc E Rothenberg, Ikuo Hirano, Evan S Dellon, Kathryn A Peterson, Joseph A Murray, Gary W Falk, Nirmala Gonsalves, Mirna Chehade, Robert M Genta, John Leung, Paneez Khoury, Amy D Klion, Sabine Hazan, Michael Vaezi, Adam C Bledsoe, Sandy R Durrani, Chao Wang, Camilla Shaw, Alan T Chang, Bhupinder Singh, Amol P Kamboj, Henrik S Rasmussen, Marc E Rothenberg, Ikuo Hirano

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic gastritis and duodenitis are characterized by gastrointestinal mucosal eosinophilia, chronic symptoms, impaired quality of life, and a lack of adequate treatments. Mast-cell activity may contribute to the pathogenesis of the conditions. AK002 (lirentelimab) is an anti-Siglec-8 antibody that depletes eosinophils and inhibits mast cells and that has shown potential in animal models as a treatment for eosinophilic gastritis and duodenitis.

Methods: In this phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults who had symptomatic eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic duodenitis, or both conditions in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive four monthly infusions of low-dose AK002, high-dose AK002, or placebo. The primary end point was the change in gastrointestinal eosinophil count from baseline to 2 weeks after the final dose; to maximize statistical power, we evaluated this end point in the placebo group as compared with the combined AK002 group. Secondary end points were treatment response (>30% reduction in total symptom score and >75% reduction in gastrointestinal eosinophil count) and the change in total symptom score.

Results: Of the 65 patients who underwent randomization, 43 were assigned to receive AK002 and 22 were assigned to receive placebo. The mean percentage change in gastrointestinal eosinophil count was -86% in the combined AK002 group, as compared with 9% in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference, -98 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -76; P<0.001). Treatment response occurred in 63% of the patients who received AK002 and in 5% of the patients who received placebo (difference, 58 percentage points; 95% CI, 36 to 74; P<0.001). The mean change in total symptom score was -48% with AK002 and -22% with placebo (least-squares mean difference, -26 percentage points; 95% CI, -44 to -9; P = 0.004). Adverse events associated with AK002 were similar to those with placebo, with the exception of higher percentages of patients having mild-to-moderate infusion-related reactions with AK002 (60% in the combined AK002 group and 23% in the placebo group).

Conclusions: In patients with eosinophilic gastritis or duodenitis, AK002 reduced gastrointestinal eosinophils and symptoms. Infusion-related reactions were more common with AK002 than with placebo. (Funded by Allakos; ENIGMA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03496571.).

Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1.. Change in Total Symptom Score.
Figure 1.. Change in Total Symptom Score.
Shown is the least-squares mean percentage change from baseline in total symptom score over time. The total symptom score was based on a daily patient-reported outcome questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed eight individual symptoms (each on a scale of 0 to 10, combining to form the total symptom score): abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, loss of appetite, abdominal cramping, bloating, and diarrhea. The total symptom score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. I bars indicate the standard error.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa