Human challenge study with a Shigella bioconjugate vaccine: Analyses of clinical efficacy and correlate of protection

Kawsar R Talaat, Cristina Alaimo, Patricia Martin, A Louis Bourgeois, Anita M Dreyer, Robert W Kaminski, Chad K Porter, Subhra Chakraborty, Kristen A Clarkson, Jessica Brubaker, Daniel Elwood, Rahel Frölich, Barbara DeNearing, Hailey Weerts, Brittany L Feijoo, Jane Halpern, David Sack, Mark S Riddle, Veronica Gambillara Fonck, Kawsar R Talaat, Cristina Alaimo, Patricia Martin, A Louis Bourgeois, Anita M Dreyer, Robert W Kaminski, Chad K Porter, Subhra Chakraborty, Kristen A Clarkson, Jessica Brubaker, Daniel Elwood, Rahel Frölich, Barbara DeNearing, Hailey Weerts, Brittany L Feijoo, Jane Halpern, David Sack, Mark S Riddle, Veronica Gambillara Fonck

Abstract

Background: Shigellosis is a major cause of moderate to severe diarrhoea and dysentery in children under 5 years of age in low and middle-income countries. The Flexyn2a vaccine conjugates the O-polysaccharide of Shigella flexneri 2a to Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. We describe a Phase 2b proof-of-concept challenge study that evaluated safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the Flexyn2a vaccine to protect against shigellosis.

Methods: In this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy adults were randomized 1:1 to receive Flexyn2a (10 µg) or placebo intramuscularly, twice, 4 weeks apart, followed by challenge 4 weeks later with 1500 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. flexneri 2a strain 2457T. The primary outcome was vaccine-induced protection. S. flexneri 2a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-specific immune responses were assessed.

Findings: Sixty-seven subjects were enrolled, 34 received vaccine and 33 placebo. The vaccine was well tolerated; the majority of adverse events were mild in nature. Thirty vaccinees and 29 placebo recipients received the S. flexneri 2a challenge. Vaccination resulted in a 30.2% reduction in shigellosis compared with placebo (13/30 vs. 18/29; p = 0.11; 95% CI -15 to 62.6). Vaccine efficacy was more robust against severe disease, reaching 51.7% (p = 0.015, 95% CI 5.3 to 77.9) against moderate/severe diarrhoea or dysentery concurrent with fever or severe enteric symptoms and 72.4% (p = 0.07) against more severe diarrhoea (≥10 lose stools or ≥1000 g loose stools/24 h). Vaccinated subjects were less likely to need early antibiotic intervention following challenge (protective efficacy 51.7%, p = 0.01; 95% CI 9 to 76.8). In those who developed shigellosis, vaccinated subjects had a lower disease severity score (p = 0.002) than placebo-recipients. Additionally, LPS-specific serum IgG responses in Flexyn2a recipients were associated with protection against disease (p = 0.0016) and with a decreased shigellosis disease score (p = 0.002).

Interpretation: The Flexyn2a bioconjugate vaccine was immunogenic, well tolerated and protected against severe illness after Shigella challenge and is a promising Shigella vaccine construct. We identified a strong association between anti-S. flexneri 2a serum IgG and a reduction in disease outcomes. (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02646371.) FUNDING: Funding for this study was through a grant from the Wellcome Trust.

Keywords: Bioconjugate vaccine; Controlled human challenge study; Shigella; Shigella flexneri 2a; Vaccine.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest CA, PM, AMD, RF and VGF were employees of LimmaTech Biologics at the time of the study. KRT, CA, PM, ALB, AMD, RWK, SC, KAC, JB, RF, BD, HW, BF, JH, DS, VGF received grant support from the Wellcome Trust. The authors declare no other competing interests.

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Design and Enrolment. Volunteers received 2 doses of the Flexyn2a vaccine or placebo 28 days apart followed by challenge with S. flexneri 2a 28 days after the second dose. Immunological assessments were done before and after vaccination and after challenge.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consort Diagram Study enrolment and subject disposition. BMI= body mass index.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The mean of the cumulative weight (Panel a) and number (Panel b) of loose stools after challenge in the Flexyn2a recipients (yellow line) and the placebo recipients (grey line). The table reports the maximum weight and number of loose stools within any 24 h period after challenge. N = number; g = grams; h = hours; GM = Geometric mean; IQR = interquartile range; SD = standard deviation (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Constitutional and enteric symptoms experienced by volunteers after Shigella flexneri 2a challenge. P= placebo recipients (n = 29); V= vaccine recipients (n = 30). Colour indicates severity. The p-value for each symptom is along the top and reflects the difference in severity utilizing the modified Ridit Score.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Shigellosis disease severity score in challenged volunteers by Vaccinee or placebo recipient (Panel a), only those that developed shigellosis by vaccinee or placebo recipient (Panel b) and those that didn't develop shigellosis by vaccinee or placebo recipient status (Panel c).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Shows the anti-S. flexneri 2a LPS serum IgG antibody titres by study day. Vac= Vaccination. C-1 = 1 day prior to challenge. C7= 7 days post-challenge.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Panel a shows the prechallenge serum IgG to S. flexneri 2a LPS in the vaccine and placebo recipients broken down by whether they met the primary objective of Shigellosis. Panel b, the relationship between pre-challenge anti-LPS serum IgG to Shigella disease severity score is demonstrated for the recipients of the Flexyn2a vaccine. Panel c demonstrates the relationship of the pre-challenge anti-LPS serum IgG to maximum stool weight (blue circles) and number (red triangles) in 24 h (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).

References

    1. Kotloff K.L., Riddle M.S., Platts-Mills J.A., Pavlinac P., Zaidi A.K.M. Shigellosis. Lancet. 2018;391(10122):801–812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33296-8. doi:Epub 2017 Dec 16.
    1. Liu J., Platts-Mills J.A., Juma J. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1291–1301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31529-X.
    1. Platts-Mills J.A., Babji S., Bodhidatta L. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: a multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED) Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(9):e564–e575. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00151-5. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
    1. Black R.E., Brown K.H., Becker S. Effects of diarrhea associated with specific enteropathogens on the growth of children in rural Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 1984;73(6):799–805.
    1. Lee G., Paredes Olortegui M., Yori P.P. Effects of Shigella, campylobacter- and ETEC-associated diarrhea on childhood growth. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(10):1004–1009.
    1. Anderson JDt, Bagamian K.H., Muhib F. Burden of enterotoxigenic escherichia coli and shigella non-fatal diarrhoeal infections in 79 low-income and lower middle-income countries: a modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(3):e321–ee30. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30483-2. doi:
    1. Rogawski E.T., Liu J., Platts-Mills J.A. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to investigate the effect of enteropathogen infections on linear growth in children in low-resource settings: longitudinal analysis of results from the MAL-ED cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(12):e1319–e1e28. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30351-6. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
    1. Shakoor S., Platts-Mills J.A., Hasan R. Antibiotic-resistant enteric infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(4):1105–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2019.05.007.
    1. Hardy A.V., Decapito T., Halbert S.P. Studies of the acute diarrheal diseases; immunization in shigellosis. Public Health Rep. 1948;63(21):685–688.
    1. Vincent H. Vaccination against bacillary dysentery with ethero-vaccine. J of State Med. 1921;29:54.
    1. Cohen D., Ashkenazi S., Green M.S. Double-blind vaccine-controlled randomised efficacy trial of an investigational Shigella sonnei conjugate vaccine in young adults. Lancet. 1997;349(9046):155–159.
    1. Passwell J.H., Ashkenzi S., Banet-Levi Y. Age-related efficacy of Shigella O-specific polysaccharide conjugates in 1-4-year-old Israeli children. Vaccine. 2010;28(10):2231–2235.
    1. Hatz C.F., Bally B., Rohrer S. Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate bioconjugate vaccine against Shigella dysenteriae type 1 administered to healthy adults: a single blind, partially randomized phase I study. Vaccine. 2015;33(36):4594–4601. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.102. Epub Jul 7.
    1. Huttner A., Hatz C., van den Dobbelsteen G. Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):528–537. doi: 10.1016/S473-3099(17)30108-1. doi:Epub 2017 Feb 24.
    1. Riddle M.S., Kaminski R.W., Di Paolo C. Safety and Immunogenicity of a candidate bioconjugate vaccine against Shigella flexneri 2a administered to healthy adults: a single-blind, randomized phase I study. Clin vaccin immunol CVI. 2016;23(12):908–917.
    1. Inoue M., Ogawa T., Tamura H. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the ExPEC4V (JNJ-63871860) vaccine for prevention of invasive extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli disease: a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy Japanese participants. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(9):2150–2157. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1474316. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
    1. Ravenscroft N., Haeuptle M.A., Kowarik M. Purification and characterization of a Shigella conjugate vaccine, produced by glycoengineering escherichia coli. Glycobiology. 2016;26(1):51–62.
    1. Porter C.K., Thura N., Ranallo R.T., Riddle M.S. The Shigella human challenge model. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(2):223–232. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001677. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
    1. Taylor D.N., McKenzie R., Durbin A. Rifaximin, a nonabsorbed oral antibiotic, prevents shigellosis after experimental challenge. Clin infect dis off publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2006;42(9):1283–1288.
    1. Talaat K.R., Bourgeois A.L., Frenck R.W. Consensus report on Shigella controlled human infection model: conduct of studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_8):S580–SS90. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz892.
    1. Kaminski R.W., Pasetti M.F., Aguilar A.O. Consensus report on Shigella controlled human infection model: immunological assays. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_8):S596–S601. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz909. doi:
    1. MacLennan C.A., Riddle M.S., Chen W.H. Consensus report on Shigella controlled human infection model: clinical endpoints. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_8):S591–S5S5. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz891. doi:
    1. Porter C.K., Lynen A., Riddle M.S. Clinical endpoints in the controlled human challenge model for Shigella: a call for standardization and the development of a disease severity score. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. doi:eCollection 2018.
    1. Turbyfill K.R., Hartman A.B., Oaks E.V. Isolation and characterization of a Shigella flexneri invasin complex subunit vaccine. Infect Immun. 2000;68(12):6624–6632.
    1. Bross I.D.J. How to use ridit analysis. Biometrics. 1958;14(1):18–38.
    1. Pinto L.A., Kemp T.J., Torres B.N. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine induces HPV-specific antibodies in the oral cavity: results from the mid-adult male vaccine trial. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(8):1276–1283. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw359. doi:Epub 2016 Aug 10.
    1. Rodenburg G.D., Sanders E.A., van Gils E.J. Salivary immune responses to the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the first 2 years of life. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(10):e46916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046916. doi:Epub 2012 Oct 16.
    1. Kotloff K.L., Nataro J.P., Losonsky G.A. A modified Shigella volunteer challenge model in which the inoculum is administered with bicarbonate buffer: clinical experience and implications for Shigella infectivity. Vaccine. 1995;13(16):1488–1494.
    1. DuPont H.L., Hornick R.B., Snyder M.J., Libonati J.P., Formal S.B., Gangarosa E.J. Immunity in shigellosis. II. Protection induced by oral live vaccine or primary infection. J Infect Dis. 1972;125(1):12–16.
    1. Herrington D.A., Van de Verg L., Formal S.B. Studies in volunteers to evaluate candidate Shigella vaccines: further experience with a bivalent salmonella typhi-Shigella sonnei vaccine and protection conferred by previous Shigella sonnei disease. Vaccine. 1990;8(4):353–357.
    1. Cohen D., Green M.S., Block C., Slepon R., Lerman Y. Natural immunity to shigellosis in two groups with different previous risks of exposure to Shigella is only partly expressed by serum antibodies to lipopolysaccharide. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(4):785–787. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.4.785. doi:
    1. Cohen D., Green M.S., Block C., Slepon R., Ofek I. Prospective study of the association between serum antibodies to lipopolysaccharide O antigen and the attack rate of shigellosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):386–389.
    1. Robin G., Cohen D., Orr N. Characterization and quantitative analysis of serum IgG class and subclass response to Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri 2a lipopolysaccharide following natural Shigella infection. J Infect Dis. 1997;175(5):1128–1133. doi: 10.1086/516452. doi:
    1. Simon J.K., Wahid R., Maciel M., Jr. Antigen-specific B memory cell responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and invasion plasmid antigen (Ipa) B elicited in volunteers vaccinated with live-attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a vaccine candidates. Vaccine. 2009;27(4):565–572. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.081. doi:Epub Nov 18.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa