Preparation of the endometrium and timing of blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers (mNC-FET): a study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre trial

Marte Saupstad, Nina La Cour Freiesleben, Sven Olaf Skouby, Lars Franch Andersen, Ulla Breth Knudsen, Kathrine Birch Petersen, Merete Husth, Anne Egeberg, Morten Rønn Petersen, Søren Ziebe, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Kristine Løssl, Anja Pinborg, Marte Saupstad, Nina La Cour Freiesleben, Sven Olaf Skouby, Lars Franch Andersen, Ulla Breth Knudsen, Kathrine Birch Petersen, Merete Husth, Anne Egeberg, Morten Rønn Petersen, Søren Ziebe, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Kristine Løssl, Anja Pinborg

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the high number of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles being conducted (190 000 cycles/year) in Europe, the timing of blastocyst transfer and the use of luteal phase progesterone support in modified natural cycle FET (mNC-FET) in assisted reproductive technologies are controversial. In mNC-FET, the timing of blastocyst warming and transfer is determined according to the time of implantation in a natural cycle, aiming to reach blastocyst endometrial synchronicity. However, the optimal day of blastocyst transfer following ovulation trigger is not determined. In addition, the value of luteal phase support to maintain the endometrium remains uncertain. Thus, there is a need to identify the optimal timing of blastocyst warming and transfer and the effect of luteal phase support in a randomised controlled trial design. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate if progesterone supplementation from the early luteal phase until gestational age 8 weeks is superior to no progesterone supplementation and to assess if blastocyst warming and transfer 6 days after ovulation trigger is superior to 7 days after ovulation trigger in mNC-FET with live birth rates as the primary outcome.

Methods and analysis: Multicentre, randomised, controlled, single-blinded trial including 604 normo-ovulatory women aged 18-41 years undergoing mNC-FET with a high-quality blastocyst originating from their first to third in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. Participants are randomised (1:1:1:1) to either luteal phase progesterone or no luteal phase progesterone and to blastocyst warming and transfer on day 6 or 7 after human chorionic gonadotropin trigger. Only single blastocyst transfers will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by the Danish Committee on Health Research Ethics (H-18025839), the Danish Medicines Agency (2018061319) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (VD-2018-381). The results of the study will be publicly disseminated.

Trial registration number: The study is registered in EudraCT (2018-002207-34) and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03795220); Pre-results.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies; endometrial preparation; frozen embryo transfer; progesterone; subfertility.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Sundhedsdatastyrelsen Assisteret reproduktion [Internet], 2017. Available:
    1. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. . Art in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE†. Hum Reprod 2018;33:1586–601. 10.1093/humrep/dey242
    1. Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, et al. . Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles—time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Fertil Steril 2011;95:1691–5. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.022
    1. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, et al. . Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;99:156–62. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003
    1. Wei D, Liu J-Y, Sun Y, et al. . Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:1310–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32843-5
    1. Chen Z-J, Shi Y, Sun Y, et al. . Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2016;375:523–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873
    1. Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. . Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2013;99:731–7. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023
    1. Maheshwari A, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the human fertilisation and embryology authority anonymized dataset. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1703–8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.047
    1. Pandey S, Hamilton M, Shetty A, et al. . Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update 2017;24:35–58.
    1. Wennerholm U-B, Henningsen A-KA, Romundstad LB, et al. . Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Human Reprod 2013;28:2545–53. 10.1093/humrep/det272
    1. Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, et al. . Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod 2018;22:253–60. 10.5935/1518-0557.20180049
    1. Templeton A, Messinis IE, Baird DT. Characteristics of ovarian follicles in spontaneous and stimulated cycles in which there was an endogenous luteinizing hormone surge. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1113–7. 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49890-0
    1. Lenton EA, Cooke ID, Hooper M, et al. . 2 in vitro fertilization in the natural cycle. Baillière's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992;6:229–45. 10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80084-7
    1. Emperaire JC. The triggering of ovulation in stimulated cycles. The Panthenon Publishing Group, 1993: 31–5.
    1. Miyake A, Aono T, Kawamura Y, et al. . Suppression of plasma luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone by administration of human chorionic gonadotropin in castrated women. Fertil Steril 1982;38:251–2. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46468-X
    1. Tavaniotou A, Devroey P. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal luteinizing hormone concentrations in natural cycles. Fertil Steril 2003;80:654–5. 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00789-1
    1. Ghobara T, Vanderkerchove P, G T, et al. . Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (review). Cochrane Libr 2017;7.
    1. Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AEP, Kollen BJ, et al. . What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:458–70. 10.1093/humupd/dmt030
    1. Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AEP, Kollen BJ, et al. . What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:255-261 10.1093/humupd/dmw046
    1. Bjuresten K, Landgren B-M, Hovatta O, et al. . Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2011;95:534–7. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.019
    1. Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, et al. . Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2425–31. 10.1093/humrep/det251
    1. Kim C-H, Lee Y-J, Lee K-H, et al. . The effect of luteal phase progesterone supplementation on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014;57 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.4.291
    1. Schwartz E, Bernard L, Ohl J, et al. . Luteal phase progesterone supplementation following induced natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019;48:95–8. 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.10.011
    1. Kyrou D, Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, et al. . Vaginal progesterone supplementation has no effect on ongoing pregnancy rate in hCG-induced natural frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;150:175–9. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.038
    1. Eftekhar M, Rahsepar M, Rahmani E. Effect of progesterone supplementation on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Fertil Steril 2013;7:13–20.
    1. van de Vijver A, Polyzos NP, Van Landuyt L, et al. . What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2016;31:1097–104. 10.1093/humrep/dew045
    1. van de Vijver A, Drakopoulos P, Polyzos NP, et al. . Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer on the 5th or 7th day of progesterone supplementation in an artificial cycle: a randomised controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33:783–6. 10.1080/09513590.2017.1318376
    1. Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, et al. . Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2234–42. 10.1093/humrep/dex285
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Research and reporting methods SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7.
    1. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 1999;11:307–11. 10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa