Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS

Karen L Barker, Christopher J Elliott, Catherine M Sackley, Jeremy C T Fairbank, Karen L Barker, Christopher J Elliott, Catherine M Sackley, Jeremy C T Fairbank

Abstract

Background: The causes of chronic low back pain (CLBP) remain obscure and effective treatment of symptoms remains elusive. A mechanism of relieving chronic pain based on the consequences of conflicting unpleasant sensory inputs to the central nervous system has been hypothesised. As a result a device was generated to deliver sensory discrimination training (FairMed), and this randomised controlled trial compared therapeutic effects with a comparable treatment modality, TENS.

Methods: 60 patients with CLBP were recruited from physiotherapy referrals to a single-blinded, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. They were randomised to receive either FairMed or TENS and asked to use the allocated device for 30 minutes, twice a day, for 3 weeks. The primary outcome variable measured at 0 and 3 weeks was pain intensity measured using a visual analogue scale averaged over 7 days. Secondary outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index, 3 timed physical tests, 4 questionnaires assessing different aspects of emotional coping and a global measure of patient rating of change. Data were analysed for the difference in change of scores between groups using one-way ANOVA.

Results: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The primary outcome, change in pain intensity (VAS) at 3 weeks showed a mean difference between groups of -0.1, (non significant p = 0.82). The mean difference in change in ODI scores was 0.4; (non significant p = 0.85). Differences in change of physical functioning showed that no significant difference in change of scores for any of these test (p = 0.58 - 0.90). Changes in scores of aspects of emotional coping also demonstrated no significant difference in change scores between the groups (p = 0.14 - 0.94).

Conclusion: FairMed was not inferior to TENS treatment. The findings have implications for further research on current chronic pain theories and treatments. Further work to explore these mechanisms is important to expand our understanding of chronic pain and the role of neuro-modulation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The FairMed; a) hand held controller and back array [b) posterior view and c) anterior view].
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram showing flow of participants through each stage of the trial.

References

    1. European guidelines for the management of low back pain
    1. Fairbank JCT, Frost H, Wilson MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker KL, Collins R. The MRC Spine Stabilisation Trial: A randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine versus an intensive rehabilitation programme on outcome in patients with chronic low back pain. British Medical Journal. 2005;330:1233–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8F.
    1. Harris AJ. Cortical origin of pathological pain. The Lancet. 1999;354:1464–1466. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05003-5.
    1. Flor H. Cortical reorganisation and chronic pain: implications for rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2003:66–72. doi: 10.1080/16501960310010179.
    1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain Mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150:971–979. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971.
    1. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of chronic low back pain: A Systematic Review. Cochrane Database Systematic Review.
    1. Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Martin DC, Schoenfield LS, Ramamurthy S. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;322:1627–1634.
    1. Cheing GLY, Hui-Chan CWY. Transcutaneous Nerve stimulation: Nonparallel antinociceptive effect on chronic clinical pain and acute experimental pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1999;80:305–312. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90142-9.
    1. Marchand S, Charest J, Li J, Chenard J-R, Lavignolle B, Laurencelle L. Is TENS purely a placebo effect? A controlled study on chronic low back pain. Pain. 1993;54:99–106. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90104-W.
    1. Julious SA. Tutorials in biostatistics: sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Statistics in Medicine. 2004;23:1921–1986. doi: 10.1002/sim.1783.
    1. Lord BA, Parsell B. Measurement of pain in the pre-hospital setting using a visual analogue scale. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2003;18:353–358.
    1. Siemonsma PC, Walker MF. Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation. 11:273–9.
    1. Johnson M. Kitchen, S Electrotherapy Evidence-Based Practice. 11. Churchill Livingston; 2001. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) p. 260.
    1. Dworkin RH, Nagasako EM, Hetzel RD, Farrar JT. Assessment of pain and pain-related quality of life in clinical trials. In: Turk DC, editor. Handbook of pain assessment. 2. New York, Melzack R: Guilford Press; 2001. pp. 659–692.
    1. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117–126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
    1. Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry Disability Index
    1. Harding VR, Williams AC de C, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Jackson JL, Richardson IH, Pither CE. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain. 1994;58:367–375. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90131-7.
    1. Zigmund AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatra Scandinavia. 1983;67:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PHTG. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 1995;5:235–252. doi: 10.1007/BF02109988.
    1. Sullivan MJL, Bishop SC, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7:524–532. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.
    1. Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. European Journal of Pain. 2007;11:153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008.
    1. Guy W. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. DHEW Publication No. ADM 76–338. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1976.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
    1. CONSORT Group. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting randomised Trials: Explanation and Elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001;134:663–694.
    1. Guieu R, Tardy-Gervet MF, Roll JP. Analgesic effects of vibration and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied separately and simultaneously to patients with chronic pain. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science. 1991;18:113–119.
    1. Lundeberg T. Long-Term Results of Vibratory Stimulation as a Pain Relieving Measure for Chronic Pain. Pain. 1984;20:13–23. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90807-8.
    1. Smeets RJ, Hijdra HJ, Kester AD, Hitters MW, Knottnerus JA. The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006;20:989–97. doi: 10.1177/0269215506070698.
    1. Levitt EE, Walker FD. Evaluation of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic pain. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1975;28:311–316. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(75)90012-0.
    1. Loeser JD, Black RG, Christman A. Relief of pain by transcutaneous stimulation. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1975;42:308–314.
    1. Bantick SJ, Wise RG, Ploghaus A, Clare S, Smith SM, Tracey I. Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI. Brain. 2002;125:310–319. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf022.
    1. Longe SE, Wise R, Bantick S, Lloyd D, Johansen-Berg H, McGlone F, Tracey I. Counter-stimulatory effects on pain perception and processing are significantly altered by attention: an fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2021–2025. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200107030-00047.
    1. Snapinn SM. Non-inferiority trials. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2000;1:19–21. doi: 10.1186/CVM-1-1-019.
    1. Hwang IK, Morikawa T. Design issues in non inferiority/equivalence trials. Drug Information Journal. 1999;33:1205–1218.
    1. Gunsolley JC, Elswick RK, Davenport JM. Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials. Journal of Periodontolgy. 1998;69:521–527.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa