Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC): a newly proposed brief questionnaire

Carolyn C Gotay, Ian S Pagano, Carolyn C Gotay, Ian S Pagano

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to design a brief questionnaire to measure fears about recurrence and health in cancer survivors. Research involving fear of recurrence has been increasing, indicating that it is an important concern among cancer survivors.

Methods: We developed and tested a six-item instrument, the Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC). Construct validity was examined in a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 592 short-term and 161 long-term cancer survivors. Convergent and discriminant validity was examined through comparisons with the PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) and the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression) measures.

Results: CFA models for the ASC with short- and long-term survivors showed good fit, with equivalent structure across both groups of cancer survivors. Convergent and discriminant validity was also supported through analyses of the PANAS and CES-D. One item (children's health worry) did not perform as well as the others, so the models were re-run with the item excluded, and the overall fit was improved.

Conclusion: The ASC showed excellent internal consistency and validity. We recommend the revised five-item instrument as an appropriate measure for assessment of cancer survivor worries.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Confirmatory Factor Models for the Six-Item and Five-Item ASC Instruments. Note. All values are standardized. The numbers on the top are for the original six-item ASC; and the numbers on the bottom are for the revised five-item ASC (children's health item excluded).

References

    1. Lee-Jones C, Humphris G, Dixon R, Hatcher MB. Fear of cancer recurrence--a literature review and proposed cognitive formulation to explain exacerbation of recurrence fears. Psychooncology. 1997;6:95–105. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199706)6:2<95::AID-PON250>;2-B.
    1. Northouse LL. Mastectomy patients and the fear of cancer recurrence. Cancer Nurs. 1981;4:213–220. doi: 10.1097/00002820-198106000-00004.
    1. Hilton BA. The relationship of uncertainty, control, commitment, and threat of recurrence to coping strategies used by women diagnosed with breast cancer. J Behav Med. 1989;12:39–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00844748.
    1. Mellon S, Northouse LL. Family survivorship and quality of life following a cancer diagnosis. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24:446–459. doi: 10.1002/nur.10004.
    1. Easterling DV, Leventhal H. Contribution of concrete cognition to emotion: neutral symptoms as elicitors of worry about cancer. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74:787–796. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.787.
    1. Lasry JC, Margolese RG. Fear of recurrence, breast-conserving surgery, and the trade-off hypothesis. Cancer. 1992;69:2111–2115. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920415)69:8<2111::AID-CNCR2820690817>;2-T.
    1. Vickberg SM. The Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS): a systematic measure of women's fears about the possibility of breast cancer recurrence. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25:16–24. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2501_03.
    1. Avis NE, Smith KW, McGraw S, Smith RG, Petronis VM, Carver CS. Assessing quality of life in adult cancer survivors (QLACS) Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1007–1023. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2147-2.
    1. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
    1. Kercher K. Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old: The PANAS as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research on Aging. Research on Aging. 1992;14:131–168. doi: 10.1177/0164027592142001.
    1. Koller M, Kussman J, Lorenz W, Jenkins M, Voss M, Arens E, Richter E, Rothmund M. Symptom reporting in cancer patients: the role of negative affect and experienced social stigma. Cancer. 1996;77:983–995. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960301)77:5<983::AID-CNCR27>;2-Z.
    1. Fromm K, Andrykowski MA, Hunt J. Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: implications for quality of life assessment. J Behav Med. 1996;19:221–240. doi: 10.1007/BF01857767.
    1. Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Sexuality following breast cancer. J Sex Marital Ther. 1999;25:237–250. doi: 10.1080/009262399278869.
    1. Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P. Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) J Psychosom Res. 1999;46:437–443. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00004-5.
    1. Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:501–514.
    1. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Lincolnwood, IL, Scientific Software International; 2004.
    1. Bryne BM, Shavelson RJ, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;105:456–466. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.
    1. Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 1993;58:525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825.
    1. Reise SP, Widaman KF, Pugh RH. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin. 1993;114:552–566. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.552.
    1. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods. 2000;3:4–70.
    1. Widaman KF, Reise SP. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In: Bryant KJ, Windle M and West SG, editor. The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC, APA; 1997. pp. 281–324.
    1. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method. Journal of Management. 1999;25:1–27. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500101.
    1. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Northridge, CA, HarperCollins; 1996.
    1. Mardia KV. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika. 1970;57:519–530. doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.3.519.
    1. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, Du Toit SHC, Du Toit M. LISREL 8: New Statistical Features (Third Printing with Revisions) Lincolnwood, IL, Scientific Software International; 2001.
    1. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. PRELIS 2: User's Reference Guide. Lincolnwood, IL, Scientific Software International; 1999.
    1. Mueller RO. Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York, Springer-Verlag; 1996.
    1. Bollen KA, Long JS. Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage; 1993.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa