Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain

W G Thompson, G F Longstreth, D A Drossman, K W Heaton, E J Irvine, S A Müller-Lissner, W G Thompson, G F Longstreth, D A Drossman, K W Heaton, E J Irvine, S A Müller-Lissner

Abstract

The Rome diagnostic criteria for the functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain are used widely in research and practice. A committee consensus approach, including criticism from multinational expert reviewers, was used to revise the diagnostic criteria and update diagnosis and treatment recommendations, based on research results. The terminology was clarified and the diagnostic criteria and management recommendations were revised. A functional bowel disorder (FBD) is diagnosed by characteristic symptoms for at least 12 weeks during the preceding 12 months in the absence of a structural or biochemical explanation. The irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal bloating, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea are distinguished by symptom-based diagnostic criteria. Unspecified FBD lacks criteria for the other FBDs. Diagnostic testing is individualized, depending on patient age, primary symptom characteristics, and other clinical and laboratory features. Functional abdominal pain (FAP) is defined as either the FAP syndrome, which requires at least six months of pain with poor relation to gut function and loss of daily activities, or unspecified FAP, which lacks criteria for the FAP syndrome. An organic cause for the pain must be excluded, but aspects of the patient's pain behavior are of primary importance. Treatment of the FBDs relies upon confident diagnosis, explanation, and reassurance. Diet alteration, drug treatment, and psychotherapy may be beneficial, depending on the symptoms and psychological features.

References

    1. Gut. 1994 Oct;35(10):1455-8
    1. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):336-40
    1. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994 Jul;49(7):505-7
    1. Lancet. 1987 Apr 25;1(8539):963-5
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Jun;42(6):1105-11
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Nov;91(11):2270-81
    1. Gastroenterology. 1984 Jul;87(1):1-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 6;333(1):1-4
    1. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Mar;9(3):299-302
    1. Z Gastroenterol. 1995 Jan;33(1):5-8
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Dec;40(12):2647-55
    1. Q J Med. 1962 Jul;31:307-22
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Apr;35(4):481-7
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Sep;38(9):1569-80
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Aug;32(8):841-5
    1. J Intern Med. 1994 Jul;236(1):23-30
    1. Gastroenterology. 1997 Jun;112(6):2120-37
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):95-8
    1. Gut. 1993 Mar;34(3):402-8
    1. BMJ. 1990 Feb 17;300(6722):439-40
    1. N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 24;327(26):1849-52
    1. Gut. 1992 Jun;33(6):818-24
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 15;116(12 Pt 1):1001-8
    1. Pain. 1990 Apr;41(1):41-6
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jun 21;292(6536):1633-5
    1. Gastroenterology. 1995 Dec;109(6):1736-41
    1. Br Med J. 1978 Sep 2;2(6138):653-4
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Aug;34(8):1153-62

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa