Controlled Human Hookworm Infection: Accelerating Human Hookworm Vaccine Development

David Diemert, Doreen Campbell, Jill Brelsford, Caitlyn Leasure, Guangzhao Li, Jin Peng, Maria Zumer, Naji Younes, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Rojelio Mejia, David I Pritchard, John M Hawdon, Jeffrey M Bethony, David Diemert, Doreen Campbell, Jill Brelsford, Caitlyn Leasure, Guangzhao Li, Jin Peng, Maria Zumer, Naji Younes, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Rojelio Mejia, David I Pritchard, John M Hawdon, Jeffrey M Bethony

Abstract

Background: Controlled human hookworm infection (CHHI) is a central component of a proposed hookworm vaccination-challenge model (HVCM) to test the efficacy of candidate vaccines. Critical to CHHI is the manufacture of Necator americanus infective larvae (NaL3) according to current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) and the determination of an inoculum of NaL3 that is safe and reliably induces patent infection.

Methods: cGMP-grade NaL3 were produced for a phase 1 trial in 20 healthy, hookworm-naïve adults in the United States, who received either 25 or 50 NaL3. Participants were monitored for 12-18 weeks postinfection for safety, tolerability, and patency of N. americanus infection.

Results: Both NaL3 doses were well tolerated. Early manifestations of infection included pruritus, pain, and papulovesicular rash at the application site. Gastrointestinal symptoms and eosinophilia appeared after week 4 postinfection. The 50 NaL3 inoculum induced patent N. americanus infection in 90% of this dose group.

Conclusions: The inoculum of 50 NaL3 was well tolerated and consistently induced patent N. americanus infection suitable for future HVCM trials.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01940757.

Keywords: Necator americanus; challenge model; controlled human hookworm infection; current good manufacturing practice; hookworm vaccine.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representative images of rash induced by application of NaL3 to the forearm. A, Day 7 postapplication of 25 NaL3. B, Day 35 postapplication of 50 NaL3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms by study week. Bar graph represents sum of participants in each dose cohort who experienced abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea that was assessed as being related to controlled human hookworm infection. A, 25 NaL3 cohort. B, 50 NaL3 cohort.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time to patency for controlled Necator americanus infection as shown by Kaplan-Meier curves for volunteers exposed to either 25 N. americanus third-stage larvae (NaL3), as shown by the red line, or 50 NaL3, as shown by the blue line. Solid lines represent the proportion of individuals in the dose group with patent N. americanus infection, as detected by saline flotation, while dotted lines represent the proportion with patent infection, as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Crosses indicate censored data. Abbreviation: qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Eggs per gram (EPG) of feces, as determined by the McMaster (A) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (B) methods for controlled human hookworm infection with an inoculum of 25 Necator americanus third-stage larvae (NaL3), as shown by the red line, or 50 NaL3, as shown by the blue line. Each dot represents the median EPG of the inoculum group by study day, and the solid lines show the trend in EPG for each inoculum group using locally weighted regression. The gray shading shows the upper and lower boundaries of the 95% confidence interval around the trend line.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Receiver operator characteristic curves comparing the accuracy (area under the curve) of quantitative polymerase chain reaction with the conventional McMaster method to indicate patency (eggs in stool) from controlled human hookworm infection with 50 Necator americanus third-stage larvae (NaL3) using the saline flotation technique as the gold standard. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; MM, McMaster; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Peripheral eosinophil counts of volunteers infected with 25 Necator americanus third-stage larvae (NaL3) in red or 50 NaL3 in blue. Dots represent median eosinophil counts by study day, and the lines show the trend of eosinophil counts for each cohort using locally weighted regression. The upper and lower boundaries of the 95% confidence interval around the trend line are depicted by the gray shading.

References

    1. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, et al. . Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet 2006; 367:1521–32.
    1. Passerini L, Casey GJ, Biggs BA, et al. . Increased birth weight associated with regular pre-pregnancy deworming and weekly iron-folic acid supplementation for Vietnamese women. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012; 6:e1608.
    1. Keiser J, Utzinger J. Efficacy of current drugs against soil-transmitted helminth infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2008; 299:1937–48.
    1. Conder GA, Campbell WC. Chemotherapy of nematode infections of veterinary importance, with special reference to drug resistance. Adv Parasitol 1995; 35:1–84.
    1. Geerts S, Gryseels B. Drug resistance in human helminths: current situation and lessons from livestock. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13:207–22.
    1. Diemert DJ, Freire J, Valente V, et al. . Safety and immunogenicity of the Na-GST-1 hookworm vaccine in Brazilian and American adults. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11:e0005574.
    1. Hotez PJ, Diemert D, Bacon KM, et al. . The human hookworm vaccine. Vaccine 2013; 31(Suppl 2):B227–32.
    1. Alexander N, Cundill B, Sabatelli L, et al. . Selection and quantification of infection endpoints for trials of vaccines against intestinal helminths. Vaccine 2011; 29:3686–94.
    1. Cimino RO, Jeun R, Juarez M, et al. . Identification of human intestinal parasites affecting an asymptomatic peri-urban Argentinian population using multi-parallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8:380.
    1. Mejia R, Vicuña Y, Broncano N, et al. . A novel, multi-parallel, real-time polymerase chain reaction approach for eight gastrointestinal parasites provides improved diagnostic capabilities to resource-limited at-risk populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013; 88:1041–7.
    1. Feary J, Venn A, Brown A, et al. . Safety of hookworm infection in individuals with measurable airway responsiveness: a randomized placebo-controlled feasibility study. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:1060–8.
    1. Feary JR, Venn AJ, Mortimer K, et al. . Experimental hookworm infection: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2010; 40:299–306.
    1. Mortimer K, Brown A, Feary J, et al. . Dose-ranging study for trials of therapeutic infection with Necator americanus in humans. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006; 75:914–20.
    1. Cline BL, Little MD, Bartholomew RK, Halsey NA. Larvicidal activity of albendazole against Necator americanus in human volunteers. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1984; 33:387–94.
    1. Daveson AJ, Jones DM, Gaze S, et al. . Effect of hookworm infection on wheat challenge in celiac disease–a randomised double-blinded placebo controlled trial. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17366.
    1. Gaze S, McSorley HJ, Daveson J, et al. . Characterising the mucosal and systemic immune responses to experimental human hookworm infection. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8:e1002520.
    1. McSorley HJ, Gaze S, Daveson J, et al. . Suppression of inflammatory immune responses in celiac disease by experimental hookworm infection. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24092.
    1. Maxwell C, Hussain R, Nutman TB, et al. . The clinical and immunologic responses of normal human volunteers to low dose hookworm (Necator americanus) infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1987; 37:126–34.
    1. Croese J, O’neil J, Masson J, et al. . A proof of concept study establishing Necator americanus in Crohn’s patients and reservoir donors. Gut 2006; 55:136–7.
    1. Croese J, Wood MJ, Melrose W, Speare R. Allergy controls the population density of Necator americanus in the small intestine. Gastroenterology 2006; 131:402–9.
    1. Kumar S, Pritchard DI. The partial characterization of proteases present in the excretory/secretory products and exsheathing fluid of the infective (L3) larva of Necator americanus. Int J Parasitol 1992; 22:563–72.
    1. Thienpont D, Rochette F, Vanparijis O.. Diagnosing Helminthiasis Through Coprological Examination. Beerse, Belgium: Janssen Research Foundation; 1979.
    1. Croese J, Giacomin P, Navarro S, et al. . Experimental hookworm infection and gluten microchallenge promote tolerance in celiac disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135:508–16.
    1. Hawdon JM, Volk SW, Rose R, et al. . Observations on the feeding behaviour of parasitic third-stage hookworm larvae. Parasitology 1993; 106:163–9.
    1. Wright V, Bickle Q. Immune responses following experimental human hookworm infection. Clin Exp Immunol 2005; 142:398–403.
    1. Jian X, Shu-Hua X, Hui-Qing Q, et al. . Necator americanus: maintenance through one hundred generations in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). II. Morphological development of the adult and its comparison with humans. Exp Parasitol 2003; 105:192–200.
    1. Correale J. Helminth/parasite treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2014; 16:296.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa