Early outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Ghulam Hussain, Hammad Azam, Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig, Naseem Ahmad, Ghulam Hussain, Hammad Azam, Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig, Naseem Ahmad

Abstract

Objectives: To see the early post-operative outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Methods: This retrospective analytical study was conducted at Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Multan, Pakistan. Our Primary outcome variables were; necessity of inotropic support, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ICU stay, nonfatal stroke, new renal failure requiring dialysis and death within 30 days after operation. There were two groups of patients; Group-I (On-pump group) and Group-II (Off-pump Group). SPSS V17 was used for data analysis. Independent sample t-test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative Variables. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze qualitative variables. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Three hundred patients were included in this study. There were no significant difference regarding risk factors except hyper-cholestrolemia which was high in off pump group (p-value 0.05). Angiographic and Echocardiographic characteristics e.g. preoperative ejection fraction, LV function grade and severity of CAD was same between the groups. Mortality risk scores and Priority status for surgery were also same. Regarding post-operative outcomes; Post-op CKMB Levels, need and duration of inotropic support, mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay was significantly less in Off-Pump group (p-value 0.001, <0.0001, 0.006, 0.025 and 0.001 resp.). Peri-operative chest drainage was significantly high in On-pump CABG group (p-value 0.027). Incidence of post-op complications was not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusions: At 30 days follow-up, Incidence of myocardial infarction, necessity and duration of inotropic support, ICU stay period and peri-operative bleeding were significantly less in off-pump group. The incidence of neurologic, pulmonary and renal complications was same between the off-pump and on-pump groups.

Keywords: Myocardial Infarction; Off-pump CABG; On-Pump CABG.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest: None.

References

    1. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E, Peduzzi P, Takaro T, Fisher L, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994;344(8922):563–570. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91963-1.
    1. Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, Pauker SG, Salem DN, Wong JB. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one-to eight-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(8):1293–1304. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00157-8.
    1. Grover FL, Shroyer ALW, Hammermeister K, Edwards FH, Ferguson TB, Jr, Dziuban SW, Jr, et al. A decade’s experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases. Ann Surg. 2001;234(4):464.
    1. Lamy A, Devereaux P, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Eng J Med. 2012;366(16):1489–1497. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1200388.
    1. Benetti FJ, Naselli G, Wood M, Geffner L. Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. Chest J. 1991;100(2):312–316.
    1. Cleveland JC, Shroyer ALW, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2001;72(4):1282–1289. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03006-5.
    1. Wan S, Izzat MB, Lee TW, Wan IY, Tang NL, Yim AP. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel CABG reduces cytokine response and myocardial injury. Ann Thoracic Surg. 1999;68(1):52–56. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00315-X.
    1. Smith P. The cerebral complications of coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng. 1988;70(4):212.
    1. Taylor KM. Brain damage during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thoracic Surg. 1998;65(4):S20–S26. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00072-1.
    1. Chang WI, Kim KB, Kim JH, Ham BM, Kim YL. Hemodynamic changes during posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass: comparison between deep pericardial sutures and vacuum-assisted apical suction device. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2004;78(6):2057–2062. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.059.
    1. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, Ferguson TB, Gardner TJ, Hiratzka LF, et al. Comparing On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Numerous Studies but Few Conclusions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia in Collaboration With the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2005;111(21):2858–64. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.165030.
    1. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Huber PR, Block PC, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;291(15):1841–1849. doi:10.1001/jama.291.15.1841.
    1. Song HK, Petersen RJ, Sharoni E, Guyton RA, Puskas JD. Safe evolution towards routine off-pump coronary artery bypass: negotiating the learning curve. Euro J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2003;24(6):947–952. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00616-X.
    1. Subramaniam MH, Khan N, DeSouza A, Mister R. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;2004(350):1791–1793. doi:10.1056/NEJMc040211.
    1. Buffolo E, De Andrade JCS, Branco JNR, Teles CA, Aguiar LF, Gomes WJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thoracic Surg. 1996;61(1):63–66. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00840-3.
    1. Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP. The present status of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Euro J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2009;36(2):312–321. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.025.
    1. Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM, Thourani VH, Cooper WA, Vassiliades TA, et al. Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2008;86(4):1139–1146. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.073.
    1. Al-Ruzzeh S, George S, Bustami M, Wray J, Ilsley C, Athanasiou T, et al. Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2006;332(7554):1365. doi:10.1136/bmj.38852.479907.7C.
    1. Parolari A, Pesce LL, Trezzi M, Loardi C, Kassem S, Brambillasca C, et al. Performance of EuroSCORE in CABG and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: single institution experience and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(3):297–304. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn581.
    1. Møller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, Steinbrüchel DA, Gluud C. Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off-vs on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(21):2601–2616. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn335.
    1. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, Higgins RS, Carlson RE, Culliford AT, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation. 2007;116(10):1145–1152. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.675595.
    1. Sergeant P, Wouters P, Meyns B, Bert C, Van Hemelrijck J, Bogaerts C, et al. OPCAB versus early mortality and morbidity: an issue between clinical relevance and statistical significance. Euro J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2004;25(5):779–785. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.013.
    1. Chu D, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK, LeMaire SA, Coselli JS, Huh J. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a cohort of 63,000 patients. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2009;87(6):1820–1827. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.052.
    1. Serrao M, Graca F, Rodrigues R, Abecasis M, Bruges L, Calquinha J, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians: long-term results. Rev Port Cardiol. 2010;29(6):989–998.
    1. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1827–1837. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902905.
    1. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, van Boven WJ, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Eng J Med. 2003;348(5):394–402. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021775.
    1. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, Payne N, Cann C, Young K, et al. Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325(7375):1268. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1268.
    1. Reston JT, Tregear SJ, Turkelson CM. Meta-analysis of short-term and mid-term outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2003;76(5):1510–1515. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01195-0.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa