Lessons learned about the effective operationalization of champions as an implementation strategy: results from a qualitative process evaluation of a pragmatic trial

Arwen E Bunce, Inga Gruß, James V Davis, Stuart Cowburn, Deborah Cohen, Jee Oakley, Rachel Gold, Arwen E Bunce, Inga Gruß, James V Davis, Stuart Cowburn, Deborah Cohen, Jee Oakley, Rachel Gold

Abstract

Background: Though the knowledge base on implementation strategies is growing, much remains unknown about how to most effectively operationalize these strategies in diverse contexts. For example, while evidence shows that champions can effectively support implementation efforts in some circumstances, little has been reported on how to operationalize this role optimally in different settings, or on the specific pathways through which champions enact change.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from a pragmatic trial comparing implementation strategies supporting the adoption of guideline-concordant cardioprotective prescribing in community health centers in the USA. Quantitative data came from the community health centers' shared electronic health record; qualitative data sources included community health center staff interviews over 3 years. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, data were collected concurrently and merged for interpretation to identify factors associated with improved outcomes. Qualitative analysis was guided by the constant comparative method. As results from the quantitative and initial qualitative analyses indicated the essential role that champions played in promoting guideline-concordant prescribing, we conducted multiple immersion-crystallization cycles to better understand this finding.

Results: Five community health centers demonstrated statistically significant increases in guideline-concordant cardioprotective prescribing. A combination of factors appeared key to their successful practice change: (1) A clinician champion who demonstrated a sustained commitment to implementation activities and exhibited engagement, influence, credibility, and capacity; and (2) organizational support for the intervention. In contrast, the seven community health centers that did not show improved outcomes lacked a champion with the necessary characteristics, and/or organizational support. Case studies illustrate the diverse, context-specific pathways that enabled or prevented study implementers from advancing practice change.

Conclusion: This analysis confirms the important role of champions in implementation efforts and offers insight into the context-specific mechanisms through which champions enact practice change. The results also highlight the potential impact of misaligned implementation support and key modifiable barriers and facilitators on implementation outcomes. Here, unexamined assumptions and a lack of evidence-based guidance on how best to identify and prepare effective champions led to implementation support that failed to address important barriers to intervention success.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02325531 . Registered 15 December 2014.

Keywords: Clinical champions; Implementation strategies; Practice change; Reflexivity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study and data collection timeline

References

    1. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.
    1. Leeman J, Birken SA, Powell BJ, Rohweder C, Shea CM. Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x.
    1. Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, Aarons GA, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, et al. Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: a research agenda. Front Public Health. 2019;7:3. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003.
    1. Ross J, Stevenson F, Dack C, Pal K, May C, Michie S, et al. Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3615-7.
    1. Go VF, Morales GJ, Mai NT, Brownson RC, Ha TV, Miller WC. Finding what works: identification of implementation strategies for the integration of methadone maintenance therapy and HIV services in Vietnam. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0420-8.
    1. Birken SA, Nilsen P. Implementation science as an organizational process. Health Care Manage Rev. 2018;43(3):181. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000212.
    1. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
    1. Gagliardi AR, Alhabib S, and the members of the Guidelines International Network Implementation Working G Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0247-8.
    1. Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons GA, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):177–194. doi: 10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6.
    1. Boyd MR, Powell BJ, Endicott D, Lewis CC. A method for tracking implementation strategies: an exemplar implementing measurement-based care in community behavioral health clinics. Behav Ther. 2018;49(4):525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.11.012.
    1. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, et al. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2015;4. 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub3.
    1. Mittman BS. In: Implementation science in health care. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
    1. Wensing M, Huntink E, van Lieshout J, Godycki-Cwirko M, Kowalczyk A, Jager C, et al. Tailored implementation of evidence-based practice for patients with chronic diseases. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101981.
    1. Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R. Selecting, tailoring, and implementing knowledge translation interventions. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, England; 2009.
    1. Harrison MB, Legare F, Graham ID, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. Cmaj. 2010;182(2):E78–E84. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081232.
    1. Gold R, Bunce AE, Cohen DJ, Hollombe C, Nelson CA, Proctor EK, et al. Reporting on the strategies needed to implement proven interventions: an example from a “real-world” cross-setting implementation study. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2016;91(8):1074–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.014.
    1. Kothari A, Rudman D, Dobbins M, Rouse M, Sibbald S, Edwards N. The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-20.
    1. Damschroder L, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(50). 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
    1. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Wilkinson J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Baker R, et al. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11:17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0380-z.
    1. Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Rabin B, Aarons GA. Systematic review of the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6.
    1. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.
    1. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):171–181. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z.
    1. Ober AJ, Watkins KE, Hunter SB, Ewing B, Lamp K, Lind M, et al. Assessing and improving organizational readiness to implement substance use disorder treatment in primary care: findings from the SUMMIT study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0673-6.
    1. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.
    1. Perry CK, Damschroder LJ, Hemler JR, Woodson TT, Ono SS, Cohen DJ. Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0876-4.
    1. Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-35.
    1. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.
    1. Gold R, Bunce A, Cowburn S, Davis J, Nelson J, Nelson C, et al. Does increased implementation support improve community clinics’ guideline-concordant care? Results of a mixed methods, pragmatic comparative effective trial. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0948-5.
    1. Hendy J, Barlow J. The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2012;74(3):348-355.
    1. Shaw EK, Howard J, West DR, Crabtree BF, Nease DE, Jr, Tutt B, et al. The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP) J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):676–685. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110281.
    1. Miech EJ, Rattray NA, Flanagan ME, Damschroder L, Schmid AA, Damush TM. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118773261. doi: 10.1177/2050312118773261.
    1. Soo S, Berta W, Baker G. Role of champions in the implementation of patient safety practice change. Healthcare Q. 2009;12(Sp):123–128. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20979.
    1. Urquhart R, Kendell C, Geldenhuys L, Ross A, Rajaraman M, Folkes A, et al. The role of scientific evidence in decisions to adopt complex innovations in cancer care settings: a multiple case study in Nova Scotia, Canada. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0859-5.
    1. Lewis CC, Klasnja P, Powell BJ, Lyon AR, Tuzzio L, Jones S, et al. From classification to causality: advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science. Front Public Health. 2018;6:136. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136.
    1. Goff D, Lloyd-Jones D, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R. et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Circulation. 2013;129(25):S49–73.
    1. Shifaza F, Evans D, Bradley H, Ullrich S. Developing evidence-based practice champions in the Maldives. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19(6):596–602. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12106.
    1. Luz S, Shadmi E, Admi H, Peterfreund I, Drach-Zahavy A. Characteristics and behaviours of formal versus informal nurse champions and their relationship to innovation success. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(1):85–95. doi: 10.1111/jan.13838.
    1. Warrick DD. Developing organization change champions. OD Practitioner. 2009;41:14–19.
    1. Gold R, Bunce A, Cowburn S, Davis JV, Hollombe C, Nelson CA, et al. Cardiovascular care guideline implementation in community health centers in Oregon: a mixed-methods analysis of real-world barriers and challenges. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2194-3.
    1. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2017. Chapter 7: Analyzing and Interpreting Data in Mixed Methods Research.
    1. Cohen D, McDaniel RR, Jr, Crabtree BF, Ruhe MC, Weyer SM, Tallia A, Miller WL, Goodwin MA, Nutting P, Solberg LI, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, Gilchrist V, Stange KC. A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag. 2004;49(3):155–168.
    1. Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2003.
    1. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research – techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2. London, England: Sage Publications; 1998.
    1. Zhou H, Taber C, Arcona S, Li Y. Difference-in-differences method in comparative effectiveness research: utility with unbalanced groups. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(4):419–429. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0249-y.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems. 1965;12(4):436–455. doi: 10.2307/798843.
    1. Borkan J. Immersion/Crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999. pp. 179–194.
    1. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
    1. Bonawitz K, Wetmore M, Heisler M, Dalton VK, Damschroder LJ, Forman J, Allan KR, Moniz MH. Champions in context: which attributes matter for change efforts in healthcare? Implementation Science. 2020;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01024-9.
    1. Sharkey S, Hudak S, Horn SD, Barrett R, Spector W, Limcangco R. Exploratory study of nursing home factors associated with successful implementation of clinical decision support tools for pressure ulcer prevention. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013;26(2):83–92. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Aagaard EM, Gonzales R, Camargo CA, Auten R, Levin SK, Maselli J, et al. Physician champions are key to improving antibiotic prescribing quality. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2010;36(3):109–116.
    1. Urquhart R, Porter GA, Sargeant J, Jackson L, Grunfeld E. Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting. Implement Sci. 2014;9:121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0121-0.
    1. Fook J. Reflexivity as method. Palliative Care Unit: La Trobe University, Melbourne; 1999.
    1. Cambridge Dictionary. Meaning of assumption in English [Webpage]. Available from: . [].
    1. White S, Fook J, Gardner F. Critical reflection in health and social care: open university press; 2006. Chapter 10: Using critical reflection in research and evaluation; p144-155.
    1. Jones-Devitt S, Smith L. Critical thinking in health and social care. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2007.
    1. Ramos-Vidal, I., Palacio, J., Villamil, I. et al. Examining the effect of the individual characteristics of implementers and the interaction of multiple relationships on the structure of psychosocial intervention teams. Implement Sci. 2020;15(69).

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa