Prediction of late disease recurrence and extended adjuvant letrozole benefit by the HOXB13/IL17BR biomarker

Dennis C Sgroi, Erin Carney, Elizabeth Zarrella, Lauren Steffel, Shemeica N Binns, Dianne M Finkelstein, Jackie Szymonifka, Atul K Bhan, Lois E Shepherd, Yi Zhang, Catherine A Schnabel, Mark G Erlander, James N Ingle, Peggy Porter, Hyman B Muss, Katherine I Pritchard, Dongsheng Tu, David L Rimm, Paul E Goss, Dennis C Sgroi, Erin Carney, Elizabeth Zarrella, Lauren Steffel, Shemeica N Binns, Dianne M Finkelstein, Jackie Szymonifka, Atul K Bhan, Lois E Shepherd, Yi Zhang, Catherine A Schnabel, Mark G Erlander, James N Ingle, Peggy Porter, Hyman B Muss, Katherine I Pritchard, Dongsheng Tu, David L Rimm, Paul E Goss

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers to optimize extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer are limited. The HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) biomarker predicts recurrence risk in ER-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients. H/I was evaluated in MA.17 trial for prognostic performance for late recurrence and treatment benefit from extended adjuvant letrozole.

Methods: A prospective-retrospective, nested case-control design of 83 recurrences matched to 166 nonrecurrences from letrozole- and placebo-treated patients within MA.17 was conducted. Expression of H/I within primary tumors was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction with a prespecified cutpoint. The predictive ability of H/I for ascertaining benefit from letrozole was determined using multivariable conditional logistic regression including standard clinicopathological factors as covariates. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: High H/I was statistically significantly associated with a decrease in late recurrence in patients receiving extended letrozole therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.16 to 0.75; P = .007). In an adjusted model with standard clinicopathological factors, high H/I remained statistically significantly associated with patient benefit from letrozole (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.73; P = .006). Reduction in the absolute risk of recurrence at 5 years was 16.5% for patients with high H/I (P = .007). The interaction between H/I and letrozole treatment was statistically significant (P = .03).

Conclusions: In the absence of extended letrozole therapy, high H/I identifies a subgroup of ER-positive patients disease-free after 5 years of tamoxifen who are at risk for late recurrence. When extended endocrine therapy with letrozole is prescribed, high H/I predicts benefit from therapy and a decreased probability of late disease recurrence.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The overall MA.17 trial design (A), and the sample consort of the MA.17 biomarker study (B).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plots showing odds ratio (OR) for recurrence associated with clinico-pathological factors and treatment effect for each of the HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) groups. The odds ratio for recurrence was calculated from conditional logistic regression. Red color indicates H/I-high patients; black color indicates H/I-low patients. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; PR = progesterone receptor.

References

    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–1717
    1. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S, et al. A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1793–1802
    1. Jin H, Tu D, Zhao N, et al. Longer-term outcomes of letrozole versus placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen in the NCIC CTG MA.17 trial: analyses adjusting for treatment crossover. J Clin Oncol. 2011;30:718–721
    1. Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3784–3796
    1. Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO. et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines, Breast Cancer. 2011. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9:136–222
    1. Goss PE. Letrozole in the extended adjuvant setting: MA.17. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;105(Suppl 1):45–53
    1. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:55–65
    1. Cardoso F, Van’t Veer L, Rutgers E, et al. Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:729–735
    1. Burstein HJ, Griggs JJ. Deep time: the long and the short of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:684–686
    1. Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Ingle JN, et al. A two-gene expression ratio of homeobox 13 and interleukin-17B receptor for prediction of recurrence and survival in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:2080–2087
    1. Ma XJ, Hilsenbeck SG, Wang W, et al. The HOXB13:IL17BR expression index is a prognostic factor in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4611–4619
    1. Ma XJ, Salunga R, Dahiya S, et al. A five-gene molecular grade index and HOXB13:IL17BR are complementary prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2601–2608
    1. Ma XJ, Wang Z, Ryan PD, et al. A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:607–616
    1. Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1446–1152
    1. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2784–2795
    1. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:18–43
    1. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008;50:346–363
    1. Langholz B, Borgan O. Estimation of absolute risk from nested case-control data. Biometrics. 1997;53:767–774
    1. Devlin TF, Weeks BJ. Spline functions for logistic regression modeling. Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1986:646–651
    1. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S, et al. Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1262–1271
    1. Dent SF, Gaspo R, Kissner M, et al. Aromatase inhibitor therapy: toxicities and management strategies in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:295–310
    1. Partridge AH, LaFountain A, Mayer E, et al. Adherence to initial adjuvant anastrozole therapy among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:556–562
    1. Verma S, Madarnas Y, Sehdev S, et al. Patient adherence to aromatase inhibitor treatment in the adjuvant setting. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(Suppl 1):S3–S9
    1. Myrick ME, Schmid SM, Kilic N, et al. Eligibility, compliance and persistence of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 2011;51:247–253
    1. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pater JL, et al. Late extended adjuvant treatment with letrozole improves outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer who complete 5 years of tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1948–1955
    1. Goss PE, Muss HB, Ingle JN, et al. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: current status and future directions. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008;8:411–417

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa