The Role of Uterine and Umbilical Arterial Doppler in High-risk Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study from India

Teena Nagar, Deepak Sharma, Mukesh Choudhary, Shusheela Khoiwal, Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Aakash Pandita, Teena Nagar, Deepak Sharma, Mukesh Choudhary, Shusheela Khoiwal, Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Aakash Pandita

Abstract

Aim: To study the role of Doppler imaging in prediction of high-risk pregnancies and their outcomes.

Methods and material: This prospective study in a setup of tertiary-level care center includes 500 high-risk pregnant women from rural and urban sectors and evaluates the predictive values of various Doppler indices.

Results: Out of 500 patients, 110 patients had abnormal Doppler among them, 70 patients had abnormal uterine artery Doppler, and 50 patients had abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow indices. In all, 10 patients had both umbilical artery and uterine artery abnormal Doppler indices. When uterine artery was abnormal (70 patients), 20 patients had preeclampsia, 10 patients had pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), and 25 patients had intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio and notch had sensitivity of 60% and positive predictive value of 33.3% and 37.5%, respectively. When umbilical artery was abnormal (50 patients), 10 had preeclampsia, 15 had PIH, and 15 had IUGR. S/D ratio had the highest positive predictive value of 40%; sensitivity is same for all. In uterine artery, combination of parameters had the best sensitivity of 80%, followed by notch and S/D ratio. In umbilical artery, combination of parameters, S/D ratio, and RI (resistance index) had sensitivity of 40%; specificity of all the indices was 91-96%. In all, 20 patients had bilateral notch, and among them 15 developed preeclampsia and 15 developed IUGR. When both uterine and umbilical artery Doppler were abnormal (10 patients), all patients had preeclampsia and IUGR.

Conclusion: Therefore, Doppler study may be used for the prediction of preeclampsia and IUGR to reduce the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: Doppler; S/D ratio; high-risk pregnancies; notch; umbilical artery Doppler; uterine artery Doppler.

References

    1. Fitzgerald DE, Drumm JE. Non-invasive measurement of the foetal circulation using ultrasound: a new method. Br Med J. 1977;2:1450–1451.
    1. McCallum WD, Olson RF, Daigle RE, Baker DW. Real time analysis of Doppler signals obtained from the fetoplacental circulation. Ultrasound Med. 1977;3B:1361–1364.
    1. Gómez O, Figueras F, Martínez JM, et al. Sequential changes in uterine artery blood flow pattern between the first and second trimesters of gestation in relation to pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(6):802–808. Review.
    1. North RA, Ferrier CL, Long D, Townend K, Kincaid Smith F. Uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms in the second trimester for the prediction of pre-eclampsia and IUGR. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:378–86.
    1. Polat I, Gedikbasi A, Kiyak H, et al. Double notches: association of uterine artery notch forms with pregnancy outcome and severity of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2015;34(1):90–101.
    1. Newnham JP, Patterson LL, James IR, Diepeveen DA. An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity analysis as a screening test in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:403–410.
    1. Bewley S, Cooper D, Campbell S. Doppler investigation of uteroplacental blood flow resistance in the second trimester; a screening test for pre-eclampsia and IUGR. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;98:871–879.
    1. Irion O, Massé J, Forest JC, Moutquin JM. Prediction of pre-eclampsia, low birth weight for gestation and prematurity by uterine artery blood flow velocity waveforms analysis in low risk nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(4):422–429.
    1. Kurdi W, Campbell S, Aquilina J, England P, Harrington K. The role of color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at 20 weeks of gestation in stratifying antenatal care. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1988;12:339–345.
    1. Bhattacharya SK, Kundu S, Kabiraj SP. Prediction of preeclampsia by mid trimester uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in high risk and low risk women. J Obstet Gyanecol. 2012;62(3):297–300.
    1. Bower S, Bewly S, Campbell S. Improved prediction of pre-eclampsia by two stage screening of uterine arteries using the early diastolic notch and color. Doppler Imaging. 1993;82:78–83.
    1. Antsaklis A, Daskalakis G, Tzortzis E, Michalas S. The effect of gestational age with placental location on the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in low risk nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:635–639.
    1. Mirza FG, Strohsnitter WC, Rivera J, Gyamfibannerman C. Intrauterine growth restriction with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler: a harbinger for pre eclampsia? J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2658–2661.
    1. Velauthau L, Plana MN, Kalidindi M, et al. First trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gyanecol. 2014;43(5):500–507.
    1. Beattie RB, Dornan JC. Antenatal screening for IUGR with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. Br Med J. 1989;298:631–635.
    1. Romero Arauz JF, Ramos Leon JC, Rivera Velasquez P, Alvarez Jimenzez G, Molina Perez CJ. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry and adverse perinatal outcome in severe pre eclampsia. Ginecol Obstet Max. 2008;76(8):440–449.
    1. St Clair NE, Batra M, Kuzminski J, Lee AC, O’Callahan C. Global challenges, efforts, and controversies in neonatal care. Clin Perinatol. 2014;41(4):749–772.
    1. Murki S, Sharma D. Intrauterine growth retardation—a review article. J Neonatal Biol. 2014;3:3.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa