The Centre H. Becquerel studies in inflammatory non metastatic breast cancer. Combined modality approach in 178 patients

B Chevallier, P Bastit, Y Graic, J F Menard, J P Dauce, J P Julien, B Clavier, A Kunlin, J D'Anjou, B Chevallier, P Bastit, Y Graic, J F Menard, J P Dauce, J P Julien, B Clavier, A Kunlin, J D'Anjou

Abstract

One hundred and seventy-eight patients with non metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have been treated at the Centre H. Becquerel. Median follow up is 67 months (6-178). Every patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mean number of cycles = 4; range: 2-8), followed by a loco regional treatment (radiotherapy = XRT or modified radical mastectomy = S), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. During this period, the types of chemotherapy and locoregional treatment have been the following: Study I: 64 patients treated with CMF or AVCF and XRT; Study II: 83 patients, treated with either AVCF, FAC or VAC followed by S (n = 38) or XRT (n = 22) in case of complete or partial response, or followed by XRT (23) in case of initial supraclavicular lymph node involvement or lack of response after chemotherapy; Study III: 31 patients treated with FEC-HD + Estrogenic recruitment followed by S and XRT after adjuvant chemotherapy, except seven patients who received XRT (refusal of surgery). Although objective response rates (= 56.2, 73.5 and 93.5% for study I, II and III respectively) are statistically better in the 3rd study, this does not translate in dramatically different disease free survival (median = 16.7, 19 and 22.2 months respectively for study I, II and III) or overall survival (median = 25, 45.7 and 32.6 months respectively for study I, II and III). Analysis of subset of patients without supra clavicular lymph node involvement where neoadjuvant chemotherapy obtained at least a 50% response reveals a median disease free survival and median overall survival of respectively 38.3 and 60.1 months for patients who underwent S vs 19 and 38.3 months for those who received XRT (P = 0.15). These studies suggest that surgery has no deleterious effect on outcome of IBC. Advantage on disease free survival or overall survival from intensive chemotherapy in IBC remains to be proven with appropriate randomised trials.

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1984 Jul;148(1):125-31
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Mar;9(3):499-508
    1. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70
    1. Am J Surg. 1976 May;131(5):583-6
    1. Cancer. 1978 Apr;41(4):1595-605
    1. Cancer. 1981 Jan 1;47(1):207-14
    1. Cancer. 1982 Mar 15;49(6):1266-71
    1. Br J Cancer. 1982 Mar;45(3):367-74
    1. Cancer Res. 1986 May;46(5):2578-81
    1. Am J Clin Oncol. 1985 Apr;8(2):134-41
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Dec;4(12):1727-9
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Dec;4(12):1765-71
    1. Cancer. 1987 Mar 15;59(6):1063-7
    1. Cancer. 1987 Aug 15;60(4):897-902
    1. Cancer Res. 1987 Jul 15;47(14):3889-94
    1. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987 Jul;23(7):897-900
    1. Int J Cancer. 1987 Oct 15;40(4):490-4
    1. Semin Oncol. 1987 Dec;14(4 Suppl 4):3-11
    1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1987 Nov;10(2):145-9
    1. Cancer. 1988 Apr 15;61(8):1483-91
    1. Int Surg. 1988 Apr-Jun;73(2):112-5
    1. Cancer. 1989 Mar 15;63(6):1225-32
    1. Important Adv Oncol. 1989;:129-50
    1. Bull Cancer. 1989;76(1):99-104
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Oct;17(4):739-45
    1. Cancer. 1990 Feb 15;65(4):851-5
    1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1990 Jul;16(1):15-22
    1. Cancer. 1986 Jan 1;57(1):24-8

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa