Comprehensiveness and validity of a multidimensional assessment in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study

Thomas Benz, Susanne Lehmann, Achim Elfering, Peter S Sandor, Felix Angst, Thomas Benz, Susanne Lehmann, Achim Elfering, Peter S Sandor, Felix Angst

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain is a multidimensional syndrome affecting physical activity and function, health-related quality of life and employment status. The aim of the study was to quantify the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of single measurement scales in specific construct domains and to examine how they combine to build a comprehensive outcome, covering the complex construct of chronic low back pain before and after a standardized interdisciplinary pain program.

Methods: This prospective cohort study assessed 177 patients using the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 2 functional performance tests, the Back Performance Scale (BPS) and the 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD). The comprehensiveness and overlap of the constructs used were quantified cross-sectionally and longitudinally by bivariate correlations, exploratory factor analysis, and effect sizes.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 48.0 years (+/- 12.7); 59.3% were female. Correlations of baseline scores ranged from r = - 0.01 (BPS with MPI Life control) to r = 0.76 (SF-36 Mental health with MPI Negative mood). SF-36 Physical functioning correlated highest with the functional performance tests (r = 0.58 BPS, 0.67 6MWD) and ODI (0.56). Correlations of change scores (difference of follow-up - baseline score) were consistent but weaker. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors: "psychosocial" and "pain & function" (totally explained variance 44.0-60.9%). Psychosocial factors loaded strongest (up to 0.89 SCL-90-R) on the first factor, covering 2/3 of the explained variance. Pain and function (ing) loaded more strongly on the second factor (up to 0.81 SF-36 Physical functioning at follow-up). All scales showed improvements, with effect sizes ranging from 0.16-0.67.

Conclusions: Our results confirm previous findings that the chronic low back pain syndrome is highly multifactorial and comprises many more dimensions of health and quality of life than merely back-related functioning. A comprehensive outcome measurement should include the predominant psychosocial domain and a broad spectrum of measurement constructs in order to assess the full complexity of the chronic low back syndrome. Convergence and divergence of the scales capture the overlapping contents and nuances within the constructs.

Keywords: Chronic low back pain; Measurement scales; Multidimensional assessment; Patient-reported outcome measurements; Performance-based outcome measurements; Validity.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interests or competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study participants

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;386:743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4.
    1. Niv D, Kreitler S. Pain and quality of life. Pain Pract Off J World Inst Pain. 2001;1:150–161. doi: 10.1046/j.1533-2500.2001.01016.x.
    1. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, et al. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a171. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a171.
    1. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. “Decade of the flags” working group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91:737–753. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224.
    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:655–670. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.008.
    1. Salathé CR, Trippolini MA, Terribilini LC, Oliveri M, Elfering A. Assessing psycho-social barriers to rehabilitation in injured workers with chronic musculoskeletal pain: development and item properties of the yellow flag questionnaire (YFQ) J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:365–376. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9728-8.
    1. Kaiser U, Kopkow C, Deckert S, Neustadt K, Jacobi L, Cameron P, et al. Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: the VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains. Pain. 2018;159:673–683. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001129.
    1. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine. 1998;23:2412–2421. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199811150-00011.
    1. Taylor AM, Phillips K, Patel KV, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Beaton D, et al. Assessment of physical function and participation in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT/OMERACT recommendations. Pain. 2016;157:1836–1850. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000577.
    1. Chiarotto A, Terwee CB, Kamper SJ, Boers M, Ostelo RW. Evidence on the measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments is largely missing in patients with low back pain: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;102:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.006.
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales. 5th edition. Revised. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine. 2011;36(21 Suppl):S54–S68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d.
    1. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The west haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (WHYMPI) Pain. 1985;23:345–356. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1.
    1. Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Boonstra AM, Dijkstra PU, Versteegen GJ, Geertzen JHB, et al. Relationship between psychological factors and performance-based and self-reported disability in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1448–1456. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0772-0.
    1. Magnussen L, Strand LI, Lygren H. Reliability and validity of the back performance scale: observing activity limitation in patients with back pain. Spine. 2004;29:903–907. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00017.
    1. Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R. Measures of physical performance assessments: self-paced walk test (SPWT), stair climb test (SCT), six-minute walk test (6MWT), chair stand test (CST), timed up & go (TUG), sock test, lift and carry test (LCT), and Car task. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S350–S370. doi: 10.1002/acr.20538.
    1. Garg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:503–518. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5.
    1. Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, et al. Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low Back pain. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2014;14:1375–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.05.002.
    1. Angst F, Brioschi R, Main CJ, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation in fibromyalgia and chronic Back pain: a prospective outcome study. J Pain. 2006;7:807–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.03.009.
    1. Angst F, Verra M, Lehmann S, Brioschi R, Aeschlimann A. Clinical effectiveness of an interdisciplinary pain management programme compared with standard inpatient rehabilitation in chronic pain: a naturalistic, prospective controlled cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:569–575. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0381.
    1. Benz T, Lehmann S, Brioschi R, Elfering A, Aeschlimann A, Angst F. Comparison of short- and mid-term outcomes of Italian- and German-speaking patients after an interdisciplinary pain management programme in Switzerland: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51:127–135. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2514.
    1. Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A. Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-26.
    1. Clement RC, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha TD, Chen JL, Davies M, et al. A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:523–533. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696.
    1. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998;23:2003–2013. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018.
    1. Chiarotto A, Boers M, Deyo RA, Buchbinder R, Corbin TP, Costa LOP, et al. Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain. Pain. 2018;159:481–495. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012.
    1. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:913–923. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00082-1.
    1. Flor H, Rudy TE, Birbaumer N, Streit B, Schugens MM. The applicability of the west haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory in German-speaking countries. Data on the reliability and validity of the MPI-D. Schmerz Berl Ger. 1990;4:82–87. doi: 10.1007/BF02527839.
    1. Franke GH. SCL-90-R. Symptom-Checkliste Von Derogatis-Dtsch Version Gött Beltz. 1995.
    1. Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JCT, Dvorak J, Grob D. Development of a German version of the Oswestry disability index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:55–65.
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. New England Medical Center Hospital, health institute. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. 3rd ed. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 2004.
    1. Busija L, Pausenberger E, Haines TP, Haymes S, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH. Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S383–S412. doi: 10.1002/acr.20541.
    1. Lurie J. A review of generic health status measures in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2000;25:3125–3129. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00007.
    1. Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: administration, scoring of procedures manual-II for the R (evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series. Towson: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1992.
    1. Preuper HRS, Boonstra AM, Wever D, Heuts PHTG, Dekker JHM, Smeets RJEM, et al. Differences in the relationship between psychosocial distress and self-reported disability in patients with chronic low back pain in six pain rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands. Spine. 2011;36:969–976. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e8af83.
    1. Edmond SL, Werneke MW, Hart DL. Association between centralization, depression, somatization, and disability among patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:801–810. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3334.
    1. Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Boonstra AM, Dijkstra PU, Versteegen GJ, Geertzen JHB. The relationship between psychosocial distress and disability assessed by the symptom Checklist-90-revised and Roland Morris disability questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2007;7:525–530. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.08.016.
    1. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–3124. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006.
    1. Kopec JA. Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain: a review of back-specific questionnaires. Spine. 2000;25:3110–3114. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00005.
    1. Lee C-P, Fu T-S, Liu C-Y, Hung C-I. Psychometric evaluation of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain: factor and Mokken analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:192. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0768-8.
    1. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25:2940–2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
    1. Strand LI. Back performance scale. J Physiother. 2017;63:262. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.07.004.
    1. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand: SF-36; Handanweisung [The SF-36 questionnaire to assess thealth status. A manual]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, Verlag für Psychologie; 1998.
    1. Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer H-K, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:819–828. doi: 10.1002/art.20688.
    1. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):S178–S189. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015.
    1. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28:632–642. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008.
    1. Portney L, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research : Applications to Practice, 3rd. 3. Upper Saddle River, N.J: F.A. Davis Company; 2015.
    1. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R. Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate methods of analysis. A practically orientated introduction.]. 14th ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Gabler; 2016.
    1. Ho R. Handbook of Univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS. 2. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013.
    1. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. 1. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1993. pp. 231–244.
    1. Lee CE, Simmonds MJ, Novy DM, Jones S. Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:227–231. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18214.
    1. Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Göeken LNH, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JHB. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:999–1005. doi: 10.1080/09638280500052823.
    1. Wittink H, Turk DC, Carr DB, Sukiennik A, Rogers W. Comparison of the redundancy, reliability, and responsiveness to change among SF-36, Oswestry disability index, and multidimensional pain inventory. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:133–142. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200405000-00002.
    1. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine. 2005;30:130–140. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000149184.16509.73.
    1. Chiarotto A, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW. Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30:1003–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.001.
    1. Saltychev M, Mattie R, McCormick Z, Bärlund E, Laimi K. Psychometric properties of the Oswestry disability index. Int J Rehabil Res Int Z Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readaptation. 2017;40:202–208.
    1. Katz JN. Measures of adult back and neck function: the North American Spine Society (NASS) lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument, neck disability index, Oswestry low Back pain disability index, Quebec Back pain disability scale, and Roland-Morris low Back pain measure. Arthritis Care Res. 2003;49:S43–S49. doi: 10.1002/art.11399.
    1. Rolli Salathé C, Elfering A, Tuschel A, Ogon M, Mayer HM, Boos N. Development and validation of the iDI: a short self-rating disability instrument for low Back pain disorders. Glob Spine J. 2017;7:123–132. doi: 10.1177/2192568217694006.
    1. Grönblad M, Järvinen E, Hurri H, Hupli M, Karaharju EO. Relationship of the pain disability index (PDI) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain. Clin J Pain. 1994;10:197–203. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199409000-00005.
    1. Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JMH, Göeken LNH. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:119–129. doi: 10.1023/A:1016834409773.
    1. Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb J, Mulholland R, Shepperd J. The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:48–52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.79B1.0790048.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa