Safety of Repeated-Dose Intratympanic Injections with AM-101 in Acute Inner Ear Tinnitus

Hinrich Staecker, Michael Morelock, Timothy Kramer, Pavel Chrbolka, Joong Ho Ahn, Thomas Meyer, Hinrich Staecker, Michael Morelock, Timothy Kramer, Pavel Chrbolka, Joong Ho Ahn, Thomas Meyer

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety and tolerability of repeated intratympanic administration of the gel-formulated NMDA receptor antagonist AM-101 in acute patients with inner ear tinnitus. Study Design Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Setting Sixty-nine secondary and tertiary sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. Subjects and Methods In total, 343 subjects with persistent acute tinnitus after traumatic cochlear injury or otitis media were randomized to receive 3 intratympanic doses of either AM-101 0.87 mg/mL or placebo over 3 to 5 days. They were followed for 84 days. The primary safety end point was the incidence of a clinically meaningful hearing deterioration from baseline to study day 35. Further safety assessments included tympanic membrane closure rates, analysis of adverse events, hematology, blood chemistry, and vital signs. In addition, data were collected on applied anesthetics and injection techniques. Results The treatment was well tolerated, with no intervention-related serious adverse events. The incidence of clinically meaningful hearing deterioration was low, comparable between treatment groups ( P = .82 for the primary safety end point) and not different between treated and untreated ears in unilaterally treated subjects. The rate of treatment and procedure-related adverse events was similar among treatment groups. The tympanic membrane was closed in 92% of subjects within 1 week and in all subjects by study day 84. Blood values and vital signs were inconspicuous. Conclusion Repeated intratympanic injections of AM-101 over a 3- to 5-day period appear to be safe and well tolerated, demonstrating the ability to potentially use this delivery approach over longer time periods.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01803646.

Keywords: AM-101; anesthetic; cochlea; hearing loss; intratympanic; local tolerance; otitis media; safety; tinnitus; traumatic; treatment.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flowchart for the TACTT2 trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Frequency of use of tympanopunction (puncturing of eardrum), tympanotomy, or application through a preexisting ventilating tube (1392 administrations in total).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Choice of local anesthetic for numbing of eardrum prior to intratympanic drug delivery (1392 administrations in total).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Frequency of clinically relevant hearing loss in treated ear(s) (threshold shift ≥15 dB in any 2 contiguous test frequencies from baseline). (a) Air conduction hearing thresholds and (b) bone conduction hearing thresholds. n = 323. FUV, follow-up visit.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Frequency of clinically relevant hearing loss in treated and untreated ears in unilaterally treated subjects (≥15 dB air conduction in any 2 contiguous test frequencies from baseline). (a) AM-101 group (n = 111); (b) placebo group (n = 72). FUV, follow-up visit.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Frequency of clinically relevant hearing loss in treated and untreated ears in unilaterally treated subjects (≥15 dB bone conduction in any 2 contiguous test frequencies from baseline). (a) AM-101 group (n = 109); (b) placebo group (n = 72). FUV, follow-up visit.

References

    1. Lustig LR. The history of intratympanic drug therapy in otology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004;37:1001-1017.
    1. Meyer T. Intratympanic treatment for tinnitus: a review. Noise Health 2013;15:83-90.
    1. Haynes DS, O’Malley M, Cohen S, Watford K, Labadie RF. Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy. Laryngoscope 2007;117:3-15.
    1. Muehlmeier G, Biesinger E, Maier H. Safety of intratympanic injection of AM-101 in patients with acute inner ear tinnitus. Audiol Neurotol. 2011;16:388-397.
    1. Van de Heyning P, Muehlmeier G, Cox T, et al. Efficacy and safety of AM-101 in the treatment of acute inner ear tinnitus—a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:589-597.
    1. Staecker H, Maxwell KS, Morris JR, et al. Selecting appropriate dose regimens for AM-101 in the intratympanic treatment of acute inner ear tinnitus. Audiol Neurotol. 2015;20:172-182.
    1. Rutherford BR, Roose SP. A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:723-733.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31:103-115.
    1. Ryan AF, Kujawa SG, Hammill T, Le Prell C, Kil J. Temporary and permanent noise-induced threshold shifts: a review of basic and clinical observations. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:271-275.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs and BA/BE Studies: Guidance for Industry and Investigators. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration; December 2012.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP), Module VI—Management and Reporting of Adverse Reactions to Medicinal Products (Rev 1). London, England: European Medicines Agency and Heads of Medicines Agencies; September 2014.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987-1991.
    1. Henry JA, Griest S, Thielman E, McMillan G, Kaelin C, Carlson KF. Tinnitus Functional Index: development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res. 2016;334:58-64.
    1. Santa Maria PL, Corrales CE, Sevy AB, Jackler RK. Iatrogenic phenol injury causing facial paralysis with tympanic membrane and ossicular necrosis. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:385-387.
    1. Fillingim RB. Individual differences in pain responses. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005;7:342-347.
    1. Ata N, Erdur O, Görgülü MH, Yilmaz E. Effects of two different local anaesthetic methods vs no anaesthesia on pain scores for intratympanic injections. Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:1153-1157.
    1. Mikulec AA, Hartsock JJ, Salt AN. Permeability of the round window membrane is influenced by the composition of applied drug solutions and by common surgical procedures. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29:1020-1026.
    1. Rauch SD, Halpin CF, Antonelli PJ, et al. Oral vs intratympanic corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;305:2071-2079.
    1. Lambert PR, Nguyen S, Maxwell KS, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to assess safety and clinical activity of OTO-104 given as a single intratympanic injection in patients with unilateral Ménière’s disease. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:1257-1265.
    1. Nakagawa T, Kumakawa K, Usami S, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical insulin-like growth factor-1 therapy for sudden deafness refractory to systemic corticosteroid treatment. BMC Med. 2014;12:219.
    1. Lambert PR, Carey J, Mikulec AA, LeBel C; Otonomy Ménière’s Study Group. Intratympanic sustained-exposure dexamethasone thermosensitive gel for symptoms of Ménière’s disease: randomized phase 2b safety and efficacy trial. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:1669-1676.
    1. Topf MC, Hsu DW, Adams DR, et al. Rate of tympanic membrane perforation after intratympanic steroid injection. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017;38:21-25.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa