A Phase 1B, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multiple-dose escalation study of NSI-189 phosphate, a neurogenic compound, in depressed patients

M Fava, K Johe, L Ereshefsky, L G Gertsik, B A English, J A Bilello, L M Thurmond, J Johnstone, B C Dickerson, N Makris, B B Hoeppner, M Flynn, D Mischoulon, G Kinrys, M P Freeman, M Fava, K Johe, L Ereshefsky, L G Gertsik, B A English, J A Bilello, L M Thurmond, J Johnstone, B C Dickerson, N Makris, B B Hoeppner, M Flynn, D Mischoulon, G Kinrys, M P Freeman

Abstract

We wanted to examine tolerability and efficacy of NSI-189, a benzylpiperizine-aminiopyridine neurogenic compound for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). This was a Phase 1B, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multiple-dose study with three cohorts. The first cohort received 40 mg q.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2), the second cohort 40 mg b.i.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2), and the third cohort 40 mg t.i.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2). Twenty-four patients with MDD were recruited, with the diagnosis and severity confirmed through remote interviews. Eligible patients received NSI-189 or placebo for 28 days in an inpatient setting with assessments for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Outpatient follow-up visits were conducted until day 84 (±3). NSI-189 was relatively well tolerated at all doses, with no serious adverse effects. NSI-189 area under the curve increased in a dose-related and nearly proportional manner across the three cohorts, with a half-life of 17.4-20.5 h. The exploratory efficacy measurements, including Symptoms Of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) showed a promising reduction in depressive and cognitive symptoms across all measures for NSI-189, with significant improvement in the SDQ and CPFQ, and a medium to large effect size for all measures. These improvements persisted during the follow-up phase. In summary, NSI-189 shows potential as a treatment for MDD in an early phase study. The main limitation of this preliminary study was the small sample size of each cohort.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean±s.e. plasma concentrations of NSI-189 on days 1, 14 and 28 during oral administration of 40 mg Q24H to subjects with MDD—linear axes (left panel) and semi-logarithmic axes (right panel). MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean±s.e. plasma concentrations of NSI-189 on days 1, 14, and 28 during oral administration of 40 mg Q12H to subjects with MDD—linear axes (left panel) and semi-logarithmic axes (right panel). MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean±s.e. plasma concentrations of NSI-189 on days 1, 14, and 28 during oral administration of 40 mg Q8H to subjects with stable depression — linear axes (left panel) and semi-logarithmic axes (right panel). MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(ad) Efficacy outcomes in means over time.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The means over time of the hippocampal and amygdala volumes (ad).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Topographs of high-frequency alpha (10–12 Hz) comparing baseline with day 28.

References

    1. Fava M, Davidson KG. Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996; 19: 179–200.
    1. Fava M. Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 53: 649–659.
    1. Nierenberg AA, Ostacher MJ, Huffman JC, Ametrano RM, Fava M, Perlis RH. A brief review of antidepressant efficacy, effectiveness, indications, and usage for major depressive disorder. J Occup Environ Med 2008; 50: 428–436.
    1. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Warden D, Ritz L et al. STAR*D study team. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 28–40.
    1. Chang T, Fava M. The future of psychopharmacology of depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71: 971–975.
    1. Cassano P, Fava M. Tolerability issues during long-term treatment with antidepressants. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2004; 16: 15–25.
    1. Malberg JEl, Schechter LE. Increasing hippocampal neurogenesis: a novel mechanism for antidepressant drugs. Curr Pharm Des 2005; 11: 145–155.
    1. Pascual-Brazo J, Baekelandt V, Encinas JM1. Neurogenesis as a new target for the development of antidepressant drugs. Curr Pharm Des 2014; 20: 3763–3775.
    1. Targum SD, Pollack MH, Fava M. Redefining affective disorders: relevance for drug development. CNS Neurosci Ther 2008; 14: 2–9.
    1. Desseilles M, Janet Witte J, Chang TE, Iovieno N, Dording C, Ashih H et al. Massachusetts General Hospital SAFER criteria for clinical trials and research. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2013; 21: 1–6.
    1. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression rating scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382–389.
    1. Guy W. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ECDEU Assessment manual for Psychopharmacology. U.S. Dept Health Education and Welfare: Rockville, MD, 1976.
    1. Pedrelli P, Blais MA, Alpert JE, Shelton RC, Walker RS, Fava M. Reliability and validity of the Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ). CNS Spectr 2014; 2: 1–12.
    1. Fava M, Iosifescu DV, Pedrelli P, Baer L. Reliability and validity of the Massachusetts general hospital cognitive and physical functioning questionnaire. Psychother Psychosom 2009; 78: 91–97.
    1. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002; 33: 341–355.
    1. Jovicich J, Czanner S, Han X, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B et al. MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: Reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths. Neuroimage 2009; 46: 177–192.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd (edn). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
    1. Borges S, Chen YF, Laughren TP, Temple R, Patel HD, David PA et al. Review of maintenance trials for major depressive disorder: a 25-year perspective from the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Psychiatry 2014; 75: 205–214.
    1. Femenía T, Gómez-Galán M, Lindskog M, Magara S. Dysfunctional hippocampal activity affects emotion and cognition in mood disorders. Brain Res 2012; 1476: 58–70.
    1. Davidson RJ, Pizzagalli D, Nitschke JB, Putnam K. Depression: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Ann Rev Psychol 2002; 53: 545–574.
    1. Fava M, Mischoulon D, Iosifescu D, Witte J, Pencina M, Flynn M et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant therapy among depressed outpatients with inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy (ADAPT-A Study). Psychother Psychosom 2012. b; 81: 87–97.
    1. Ratti E, Bettica P, Alexander R, Archer G, Carpenter D, Evoniuk G et al. Full central neurokinin-1 receptor blockade is required for efficacy in depression: evidence from orvepitant clinical studies. J Psychopharmacol 2013; 27: 424–434.
    1. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 748–751.
    1. Fava M, Targum SD, Nierenberg AA, Bleicher LS, Carter TA, Wedel PC et al. An exploratory study of combination buspirone and melatonin SR in major depressive disorder (MDD): a possible role for neurogenesis in drug discovery. J Psychiatr Res 2012. a; 46: 1553–1563.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa