Penile Hemodynamic Response to Phosphodiesterase Type V Inhibitors after Cavernosal Sparing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Prospective Randomized Open-Blinded End-Point (PROBE) Study

Adham Zaazaa, Michaela Bayerle-Eder, Ramzy Elnabarawy, Mahmoud Elbitar, Taymour Mostafa, Adham Zaazaa, Michaela Bayerle-Eder, Ramzy Elnabarawy, Mahmoud Elbitar, Taymour Mostafa

Abstract

Forceful corporal dilatation amidst penile prosthesis implantation may injure cavernosal arteries compromising penile vasculature. In this study, we aimed to compare the conventional and cavernosal sparing techniques regarding cavernosal artery preservation. Overall, 33 patients underwent inflatable penile prosthesis implantation with Coloplast Titan Touch® three-piece inflatable penile implants. 16 patients had conventional implantations with serial vigorous dilatations, while 17 patients were implanted with the cavernosal sparing technique, consisting of a single minimal corporal dilatation after an intraoperative intracavernosal injection (ICI) of Alprostadil. Postoperatively, a penile duplex Doppler ultrasound study was performed. Whenever a cavernosal artery was spared and thus successfully probed, its hemodynamics were studied before and after an oral administration of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i). A cavernosal artery was successfully probed in 16/17 (94%) of patients in the cavernosal sparing group compared to 5/16 (31%) of patients in the conventional group with a significant statistical difference (P=0.001). This demonstrated that the cavernosal sparing technique was superior to the conventional approach in preserving the cavernosal artery (odds ratio 35.2, 95% IC 3.5-344.2; P=0.0022). Whenever a cavernosal artery could be probed, its hemodynamic responsiveness was also preserved. This trial is registered with NCT03733860.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Adham Zaazaa et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inflated cylinders. 2D ultrasound image showing the inflated cylinders before penile hemodynamic measurement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postoperative baseline hemodynamics. PDDU showing postoperative baseline hemodynamics before administration of PDE5i. Note that Figures 2 and 3 are for the same patient.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postoperative post-PDE5i hemodynamics. Postoperative post-PDE5i hemodynamics measurements showing pronounced cavernosal artery waves, recorded 20 minutes after PDE5i administration and manual stimulation. Please note that Figures 2 and 3 are for the same patient.

References

    1. Brantley Scott F., Bradley W. E., Timm G. W., Timm G. W. Management of erectile impotence Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2(1):80–82. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0.
    1. Trost L., Hellstrom W. J. G. History, contemporary outcomes, and future of penile prostheses: a review of the literature. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2013;1(3):150–163. doi: 10.1002/smrj.8.
    1. Levine L. A., Becher E., Bella A., et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2016;13(4):489–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017.
    1. Montorsi F., Rigatti P., Carmignani G., et al. AMS three–piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long–term multi–institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. European Urology. 2000;37(1):50–55. doi: 10.1159/000020099.
    1. Wilson S. K., Mora-Estaves C., Egydio P., et al. Glans necrosis following penile prosthesis implantation: prevention and treatment suggestions. Urology. 2017;107:144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.020.
    1. Zaid U. B., Zhang X., Lue T. F. Physiology of penile erection. Male Sexual Dysfunction. 2016;14–21 doi: 10.1002/9781118746509.ch3.
    1. Jiann B. P., Su C. C., Tsai J. Y. Is female sexual function related to the male partners’ erectile function? The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(2):420–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.03007.x.
    1. Basson R. Human sexual response. Neurology of Sexual and Bladder Disorders. 2015;130:11–18. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63247-0.00002-x.
    1. Mireku-Boateng A. O., Dennery M., Littlejohn J. Use of sildenafil in penile implant patients. Urologia Internationalis. 2001;66(3):149–151. doi: 10.1159/000056595.
    1. Lledó garcia E., Moncada iribarren I., Jara rascón J., et al. Tratamiento con sildenafilo del síndrome de glande frio tras implante de prótesis hidráulica de pene. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2004;28(6):443–446. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(04)73107-1.
    1. Mulhall J. P., Jahoda A., Aviv N., Valenzuela R., Parker M. The impact of sildenafil citrate on sexual satisfaction profiles in men with a penile prosthesis in situ. BJU International. 2004;93(1):97–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04564.x.
    1. Grasso M., Lania C., Fortuna F., Blanco S., Piacentini I. Preservation of cavernosal erectile function after soft penile prosthesis implant in Peyronie’s disease: long-term followup. Advances in Urology. 2008;2008 doi: 10.1155/2008/646052.646052
    1. Zaazaa A., Mostafa T. Spontaneous penile tumescence by sparing cavernous tissue in the course of malleable penile prosthesis implantation. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019;16(3):474–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.012.
    1. Sikka S. C., Hellstrom W. J. G., Brock G., Morales A. M. Standardization of vascular assessment of erectile dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(1):120–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02825.x.
    1. Chung E., De Young L., Brock G. B. Penile duplex ultrasonography in men with peyronie’s disease: is it veno‐occlusive dysfunction or poor cavernosal arterial inflow that contributes to erectile dysfunction? The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2011;8(12):3446–3451. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02501.x.
    1. Mancini M., Bartolini M., Maggi V. Duplex ultrasound evaluation of cavernosal peak systolic velocity and waveform acceleration in the penile flaccid state: clinical significance in the assessment of the arterial supply in patients with erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Andrology. 2000;23(4):199–204. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00227.x.
    1. Kuo Y.-C., Liu S.-P., Chen J.-H., Chang H.-C., Tsai V. F. S., Hsieh J.-T. Feasability of a novel audio-video sexual stimulation system: an adjunct to the use of penile duplex Doppler ultrasonography for the investigation of erectile dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;7(12):3979–3983. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01583.x.
    1. Hsiao W., Shrewsberry A. B., Moses K. A., Pham D., Ritenour C. W. M. Longer time to peak flow predicts better arterial flow parameters on penile Doppler ultrasound. Urology. 2010;75(1):112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.102.
    1. Mulhall J. P., Levine L. A., Jünemann K.-P. Erection hardness: a unifying factor for defining response in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 2006;68(3):17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.041.
    1. Wilson S. K. Surgical techniques: rear tip extender sling: a quick and easy repair for crural perforation. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;7(3):1052–1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01733.x.
    1. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.-A. Classification of surgical complications. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Moncada I., Martínez-Salamanca J. I., Jara J., Cabello R., Moralejo M., Hernández C. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation without corporeal dilation: a cavernous tissue sparing technique. Journal of Urology. 2010;183(3):1123–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.048.
    1. Chivers M. L., Seto M. C., Lalumière M. L., Laan E., Grimbos T. Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2010;39(1):5–56. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9.
    1. Bickell M., Manimala N., Parker J., Steixner B., Wiegand L., Carrion R. Floppy glans syndrome: pathogenesis and treatment. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2016;4(2):149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.12.001.
    1. Welti R. S., Brodsky J. B. Treatment of intraoperative penile tumescence. Journal of Urology. 1980;124(6):925–926. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55734-1.
    1. Baltogiannis D. M., Charalabopoulos A. K., Giannakopoulos X. K., Giannakis D. J., Sofikitis N. V., Charalabopoulos K. A. Penile erection during transurethral surgery. Journal of Andrology. 2006;27(3):376–380. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.05158.
    1. Manning M., Martínez F. J., Alken P., Jünemann K.-P. Spontaneous tumescence after implantation of three-piece hydraulic penile prostheses: a short-term experience. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2003;15(3):152–155. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900979.
    1. Yildirim I., Aydur E., Tahmaz L., Irkilata H. C., Seçkin B., Peker A. F. Spontaneous and prolonged drug-induced erection in a patient with inflatable penile implant. Andrologia. 2007;39(2):71–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00755.x.
    1. Costa C., Vendeira P. Does erectile tissue angioarchitecture modify with aging? An immunohistological and morphometric approach. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008;5(4):833–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00753.x.
    1. Shah B. B., Kent M., Valenzuela R. Advanced penile length restoration techniques to optimize penile prosthesis placement outcomes. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2020;9 doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.05.007.
    1. Fernandez-Crespo R. E., Buscaino K., Parker J., Carrion R. Current status for semirigid penile prosthetic devices. Current Urology Reports. 2021;22(2):p. 7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01028-4.
    1. Althof S. E., Corty E. W., Levine S. B., et al. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1999;53(4):793–799. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00582-2.
    1. Rosen R., Cappelleri J., Smith M., Lipsky J., Peña B. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research. 1999;11(6):319–326. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa