Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ agonist pioglitazone improves vascular and metabolic dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus

Sarfaraz Hasni, Yenealem Temesgen-Oyelakin, Michael Davis, Jun Chu, Elaine Poncio, Mohammad Naqi, Sarthak Gupta, Xinghao Wang, Christopher Oliveira, Dillon Claybaugh, Amit Dey, Shajia Lu, Philip Carlucci, Monica Purmalek, Zerai G Manna, Yinghui Shi, Isabel Ochoa-Navas, Jinguo Chen, Amrita Mukherjee, Kyu Lee Han, Foo Cheung, Galina Koroleva, Yasmine Belkaid, John S Tsang, Richard Apps, Donald E Thomas, Theo Heller, Massimo Gadina, Martin P Playford, Xiaobai Li, Nehal N Mehta, Mariana J Kaplan, Sarfaraz Hasni, Yenealem Temesgen-Oyelakin, Michael Davis, Jun Chu, Elaine Poncio, Mohammad Naqi, Sarthak Gupta, Xinghao Wang, Christopher Oliveira, Dillon Claybaugh, Amit Dey, Shajia Lu, Philip Carlucci, Monica Purmalek, Zerai G Manna, Yinghui Shi, Isabel Ochoa-Navas, Jinguo Chen, Amrita Mukherjee, Kyu Lee Han, Foo Cheung, Galina Koroleva, Yasmine Belkaid, John S Tsang, Richard Apps, Donald E Thomas, Theo Heller, Massimo Gadina, Martin P Playford, Xiaobai Li, Nehal N Mehta, Mariana J Kaplan

Abstract

Objectives: Premature cardiovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) contribute to morbidity and mortality, with no effective preventive strategies described to date. Immune dysregulation and metabolic disturbances appear to play prominent roles in the induction of vascular disease in SLE. The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma agonist pioglitazone (PGZ suppresses vascular damage and immune dysregulation in murine lupus and improves endothelial dysfunction in other inflammatory diseases. We hypothesised that PGZ could improve vascular dysfunction and cardiometabolic parameters in SLE.

Methods: Eighty SLE subjects with mild to severe disease activity were randomised to a sequence of PGZ followed by placebo for 3 months, or vice versa, in a double-blind, cross-over design with a 2-month wash-out period. Primary endpoints were parameters of endothelial function and arterial inflammation, measured by multimodal assessments. Additional outcome measures of disease activity, neutrophil dysregulation, metabolic disturbances and gene expression studies were performed.

Results: Seventy-two subjects completed the study. PGZ was associated with a significant reduction in Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (a measure of arterial stiffness) compared with placebo. Various metabolic parameters improved with PGZ, including insulin resistance and lipoprotein profiles. Circulating neutrophil extracellular trap levels also significantly decreased with PGZ compared with placebo. Most adverse events experienced while on PGZ were mild and resolved with reduction in PGZ dose.

Conclusion: PGZ was well tolerated and induced significant improvement in vascular stiffness and cardiometabolic parameters in SLE. The results suggest that PGZ should be further explored as a modulator of cardiovascular disease risk in SLE.

Trial registration number: NCT02338999.

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases; lipids; systemic lupus erythematosus.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Pfizer Inc. provided the drug and placebo. No financial support from the industry. NNM reported: Grants or contracts: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Novartis, AstraZeneca. Consulting fees: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Leo Pharma. Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid: Board of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology, Board of National Psoriasis Foundation, Board of International Federation of Psoriatic Disease. DET reported: Royalties or licenses: Yearly royalties for sales of 'The Lupus Encyclopedia: A comprehensive guide for patients and families', Johns Hopkins University Press,Yearly royalties for sales of 'The Lupus Encyclopedia: A comprehensive guide for patients and families'. Consulting fees: GSK, participated in a paid group discussion that went over data of the BLISS-BELIEVE study. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Exagen, GSK, Aurinia, AstraZeneca. Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid: Sjogren’s Foundation, Unpaid: Chair of the National Board. Stock: Aurinia. Other financial or non-financial interests: AstraZeneca, On a monograph about anifrolumab; paid. GSK, In a video discussing patient experiences, paidNIAMS has collaborative research agreements with Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb and Astra Zeneca.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Flow Diagram. A total of 88 subjects were screened for the trial, with 80 subjects randomised to sequence AB (PGZ-wash-out-placebo N=39) or sequence BA (Placebo-wash-out-PGZ N=41). A total of 72 subjects completed all phases of the clinical trial. #Withdrew due to travel n=1; withdrew voluntarily due to AE (pruritus and increased urinary frequency) n=2; and lost to follow-up n=1. †Withdrawn due to SLE flare n=2. *Subject withdrew voluntarily due to weight gain n=2. AEs, adverse events; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PGZ improves vascular stiffness in SLE. Mean Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) average of right and left side in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). The CAVI values decreased by 0.32 points (95% CI 0.10 to 0.54, p=0.005) in the pioglitazone group compared with the placebo. All data presented as mean+SD. **p≤0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PGZ improves lipoprotein profiles in SLE. (A) Mean circulating HDL in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). The serum HDL levels increased by 4.72 mg/dL (95% CI: (1.27 to 8.18) with PGZ compared with placebo, with return to baseline by the end of wash-out period; p=0.008. (B) Mean circulating small LDL particles (s-LDLP) in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). The serum s-LDLP levels redcued by −254.76 (95% CI −354.13 to −155.39) with PGZ compared with placebo; p

Figure 4

PGZ reduces serum alanine and…

Figure 4

PGZ reduces serum alanine and improves insulin resistance in SLE. (A) Mean circulating…

Figure 4
PGZ reduces serum alanine and improves insulin resistance in SLE. (A) Mean circulating serum alanine levels in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). The serum alanine levels redcued by −33.35 (95% CI (−51.29 to −15.4), with PGZ compared with placebo; p=0.0004. (B) Mean homoeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA2-IR) in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). HOMA IR levels decreased by −0.23 (95% CI (−0.35 to −0.1), p=0.0003), respectively PGZ a compared with placebo. (C) Mean serum insulin levels in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). Overall, the serum insulin levels decresased by-3.77 (95% CI (−6.22 to –1.31), p=0.003) with the use of pioglitazone as compared with placebo. All data presented as mean+SD; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001. PGZ, pioglitazone; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PGZ reduces serum alanine and improves insulin resistance in SLE. (A) Mean circulating serum alanine levels in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). The serum alanine levels redcued by −33.35 (95% CI (−51.29 to −15.4), with PGZ compared with placebo; p=0.0004. (B) Mean homoeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA2-IR) in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). HOMA IR levels decreased by −0.23 (95% CI (−0.35 to −0.1), p=0.0003), respectively PGZ a compared with placebo. (C) Mean serum insulin levels in subjects randomised to sequence AB (N=39; PGZ-wash-out-placebo) and sequence BA (N=41; placebo-wash-out-PGZ). Overall, the serum insulin levels decresased by-3.77 (95% CI (−6.22 to –1.31), p=0.003) with the use of pioglitazone as compared with placebo. All data presented as mean+SD; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001. PGZ, pioglitazone; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

References

    1. Roman MJ, Shanker B-A, Davis A, et al. . Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2399–406. 10.1056/NEJMoa035471
    1. Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, et al. . Age-Specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:408–15. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122
    1. Roman MJ, Crow MK, Lockshin MD, et al. . Rate and determinants of progression of atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:3412–9. 10.1002/art.22924
    1. Kao AH, Sabatine JM, Manzi S. Update on vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003;15:519–27. 10.1097/00002281-200309000-00001
    1. Bruce IN. 'Not only…but also': factors that contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2005;44:1492–502. 10.1093/rheumatology/kei142
    1. Carlucci PM, Purmalek MM, Dey AK, et al. . Neutrophil subsets and their gene signature associate with vascular inflammation and coronary atherosclerosis in lupus. JCI Insight 2018;3. 10.1172/jci.insight.99276. [Epub ahead of print: 19 04 2018].
    1. Thacker SG, Zhao W, Smith CK, et al. . Type I interferons modulate vascular function, repair, thrombosis, and plaque progression in murine models of lupus and atherosclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2975–85. 10.1002/art.34504
    1. Gupta S, Kaplan MJ. Bite of the wolf: innate immune responses propagate autoimmunity in lupus. J Clin Invest 2021;131. 10.1172/JCI144918. [Epub ahead of print: 01 02 2021].
    1. Purmalek MM, Carlucci PM, Dey AK, et al. . Association of lipoprotein subfractions and glycoprotein acetylation with coronary plaque burden in SLE. Lupus Sci Med 2019;6:e000332. 10.1136/lupus-2019-000332
    1. Ghazarian M, Revelo XS, Nøhr MK, et al. . Type I interferon responses drive intrahepatic T cells to promote metabolic syndrome. Sci Immunol 2017;2. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aai7616
    1. Casey KA, Smith MA, Sinibaldi D, et al. . Modulation of cardiometabolic disease markers by type I interferon inhibition in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73:459–71. 10.1002/art.41518
    1. Mok CC, Tse SM, Chan KL, et al. . Effect of the metabolic syndrome on organ damage and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018;36:389–95.
    1. Hasni SA, Gupta S, Davis M, et al. . Phase 1 double-blind randomized safety trial of the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Commun 2021;12:3391. 10.1038/s41467-021-23361-z
    1. Ye Y, Zhao X, Xie H, et al. . Efficacy and safety of statins in the prevention of atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:301–3. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.190
    1. Petri MA, Kiani AN, Post W, et al. . Lupus atherosclerosis prevention study (LAPS). Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:760–5. 10.1136/ard.2010.136762
    1. Piranavan P, Perl A. Management of cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020;21:1617–28. 10.1080/14656566.2020.1770227
    1. Sazliyana S, Mohd Shahrir MS, Kong CTN, et al. . Implications of immunosuppressive agents in cardiovascular risks and carotid intima media thickness among lupus nephritis patients. Lupus 2011;20:1260–6. 10.1177/0961203311411347
    1. Abdelrahman M, Sivarajah A, Thiemermann C. Beneficial effects of PPAR-gamma ligands in ischemia-reperfusion injury, inflammation and shock. Cardiovasc Res 2005;65:772–81. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.008
    1. Aprahamian T, Bonegio RG, Richez C, et al. . The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist rosiglitazone ameliorates murine lupus by induction of adiponectin. J Immunol 2009;182:340–6. 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.340
    1. Zhao W, Thacker SG, Hodgin JB, et al. . The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist pioglitazone improves cardiometabolic risk and renal inflammation in murine lupus. J Immunol 2009;183:2729–40. 10.4049/jimmunol.0804341
    1. Venegas-Pont M, Sartori-Valinotti JC, Maric C, et al. . Rosiglitazone decreases blood pressure and renal injury in a female mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2009;296:R1282–9. 10.1152/ajpregu.90992.2008
    1. Marder W, Khalatbari S, Myles JD, et al. . The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ pioglitazone improves vascular function and decreases disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000441. 10.1161/JAHA.113.000441
    1. Ormseth MJ, Oeser AM, Cunningham A, et al. . Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist effect on rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15:R110. 10.1186/ar4290
    1. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1725;1997;40.
    1. Gompertz P, Harwood R, Ebrahim S, et al. . Validating the SF-36. BMJ 1992;305:645–6. 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.645-c
    1. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 2002;29:288–91.
    1. Isenberg DA, Allen E, Farewell V, et al. . An assessment of disease flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of BILAG 2004 and the flare version of SELENA. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:54–9. 10.1136/ard.2010.132068
    1. Aranow C. A pilot study to determine the optimal timing of the physician global assessment (PGA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Res 2015;63:167–9. 10.1007/s12026-015-8712-7
    1. Saiki A, Sato Y, Watanabe R, et al. . The role of a novel arterial stiffness parameter, Cardio-Ankle vascular index (CAVI), as a surrogate marker for cardiovascular diseases. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016;23:155–68. 10.5551/jat.32797
    1. Sato H, Miida T, Wada Y, et al. . Atherosclerosis is accelerated in patients with long-term well-controlled systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Chim Acta 2007;385:35–42. 10.1016/j.cca.2007.04.023
    1. Wohlfahrt P, Cífková R, Movsisyan N, et al. . Reference values of cardio-ankle vascular index in a random sample of a white population. J Hypertens 2017;35:2238–44. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001437
    1. Zhou Y, Huang Y, Ji X, et al. . Pioglitazone for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020;105:1670–81. 10.1210/clinem/dgz252
    1. El Magadmi M, Ahmad Y, Turkie W, et al. . Hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and circulating oxidized low density lipoprotein in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2006;33:50–6.
    1. Juárez-Rojas JG, Medina-Urrutia AX, Jorge-Galarza E, et al. . Pioglitazone improves the cardiovascular profile in patients with uncomplicated systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Lupus 2012;21:27–35. 10.1177/0961203311422096
    1. Lian J, Fu J. Pioglitazone for NAFLD patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol 2021;12. 10.3389/fendo.2021.615409
    1. Ferwana M, Firwana B, Hasan R, et al. . Pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of controlled studies. Diabet Med 2013;30:1026–32. 10.1111/dme.12144
    1. Zuo L, Wang J, Zhang N, et al. . Pioglitazone therapy decreases bone mass density and increases fat mass: a meta-analysis. Curr Pharm Des 2019;25:3590–6. 10.2174/1381612825666190920123129
    1. Dorkhan M, Dencker M, Stagmo M, et al. . Effect of pioglitazone versus insulin glargine on cardiac size, function, and measures of fluid retention in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009;8:15. 10.1186/1475-2840-8-15

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa