Selective Homogeneous Assay for Circulating Endopeptidase Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)

Travis W Bainbridge, Diana Ronai Dunshee, Noelyn M Kljavin, Nicholas J Skelton, Junichiro Sonoda, James A Ernst, Travis W Bainbridge, Diana Ronai Dunshee, Noelyn M Kljavin, Nicholas J Skelton, Junichiro Sonoda, James A Ernst

Abstract

Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) is a membrane-bound serine protease whose expression is often elevated in activated fibroblasts associated with tissue remodeling in various common diseases such as cancer, arthritis and fibrosis. Like the closely related dipeptidyl peptidase DPPIV, the extracellular domain of FAP can be released into circulation as a functional enzyme, and limited studies suggest that the circulating level of FAP correlates with the degree of tissue fibrosis. Here we describe a novel homogeneous fluorescence intensity assay for circulating FAP activity based on a recently identified natural substrate, FGF21. This assay is unique in that it can effectively distinguish endopeptidase activity of FAP from that of other related enzymes such as prolyl endopeptidase (PREP) and was validated using Fap-deficient mice. Structural modeling was used to elucidate the mechanistic basis for the observed specificity in substrate recognition by FAP, but not by DPPIV or PREP. Finally, the assay was used to detect elevated FAP activity in human patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and to determine the effectiveness of a chemical inhibitor for FAP in mice. We propose that the assay presented here could thus be utilized for diagnosis of FAP-related pathologies and for the therapeutic development of FAP inhibitors.

Conflict of interest statement

This work was funded by Genentech, Inc. All the authors are present or former paid employees of Genentech/Roche. Genentech has filed patent applications related to this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of fluorescence-quenched peptides. Peptides contain an N-terminal fluorescent donor, followed by six amino acid residues of the region flanking the dominant FAP endopeptidase cleavage site of human FGF21, ending with an additional C-terminal lysine conjugated to a dark quencher. Variants include substitution of the P1 proline with glycine, the P2 glycine with D-alanine or the entire homologous region of murine FGF21.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plasma cleavage of fluorescence-quenched peptides. (A) Cleavage rate of human WT (GP), human mutant (GG) and murine (EP) FGF21-based peptides in plasma samples isolated from Fap+/+, Fap+/−, and Fap−/− mice, as indicated (N = 3 mice per genotype). As a control, the cleavage reaction was run with 1 nM recombinant mouse FAP. Concentration of peptide substrates in this experiment was 3 µM. (B) Cleavage rate of the GP peptide by recombinant human FAP or PREP proteins at 1 nM enzyme concentration. (C) Cleavage rate of the GP peptide by recombinant human FAP (left, blue) or PREP (right, red) in the presence of an FAP-specific inhibitor cpd60 and/or PREP-specific inhibitor KYP-2047 (KYP). (D) Cleavage rate of the GP peptide in plasma from Fap+/+ (blue), Fap+/− (red), and Fap−/− (black) mice in the presence of cpd60 and/or KYP (N = 3 per group).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cleavage kinetics of GP and aP substrates by recombinant FAP. (A and B) Michaelis-Menten saturation curves for human (black) or mouse (blue) recombinant FAP cleavage of (A) the GP or (B) aP peptides. (C) Plot of fractional velocity as a function of cpd60 concentration, for recombinant mouse or human FAP with cpd60, using GP peptide. Mouse and human FAP preparations were found to be 74% and 57% active, respectively. (D) Human and mouse FAP enzyme kinetics constants with the GP and aP substrates, corrected for experimentally determined active enzyme concentrations determined in (C). Error is SEM, determined from three experimental replicates. FAP molar concentrations are based on monomer for active site titration and kinetics calculations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Specificity of aP peptide cleavage. (A) Cleavage rate of the aP or GG peptide by 1 nM recombinant, human FAP or PREP. (B) Cleavage rate of the aP peptide by a panel of recombinant, human prolyl peptidases. Each recombinant peptidase was used at 2.5 µg/ml. (C and D) Cleavage rate of ANPFAP (C) or aP NIRF (D) by 10 nM recombinant, human FAP or PREP. (E) Cleavage rate of the aP peptide in plasma from Fap+/+, Fap+/−, and Fap−/− mice. Plasma was diluted 10-fold. (F) Cleavage rate of the aP peptide in anti-FAP or control IgG-immunodepleted human serum. Serum was diluted 2.5-fold. Complete FAP removal following anti-FAP immunodepletion was shown previously by immunoblotting.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Binding mode of peptide substrates to FAP, DPPIV and PREP. (A) FAP active site (grey surface and pale green sticks) bound to modeled IPI substrate tripeptide (green sticks). (B) DPPIV active site (grey surface and pale cyan sticks) bound to IPI substrate tripeptide (cyan sticks). (C) FAP active site (grey surface and pale blue sticks) bound to modeled acetyl-VaPSQ substrate peptide (blue sticks). (D) Representative induced-fit docking model of PREP (grey surface and pale pink sticks) bound to acetyl-VAPSQ-amide substrate peptide (pink sticks). In all panels, red dashed lines indicate intermolecular and intra-substrate hydrogen bonds. (E) Comparison of cleavage rates by human FAP on VxPSQG peptide substrates containing various D-enantiomer residues at the P2 position (xP).
Figure 6
Figure 6
FAP activity in serum correlates with liver disease and FAP levels. (A) Scatter plot showing FAP activity levels determined by using the aP peptide (x axis) and FAP protein levels determined by ELISA in serum samples (y axis) from healthy individuals (N = 16, black circles) or individuals previously diagnosed with liver cirrhosis (N = 17, red circles). R2 value is indicated in the graph. (B and C) The same data as (A), with FRET and ELISA data presented separately, including mean ± SEM. P values indicated were calculated by student t-test.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Plasma FAP activity is completely suppressed in mice fed chow with cpd60. Ten to eighteen-week old C57/BL6 background mice were fed ad libitum control chow (blue circles), diet containing 20 ppm of cpd60 (green squares), or diet containing 100 ppm of cpd60 (red triangles). Plasma was isolated from blood retrieved at the indicated time points and FAP activity levels determined using the aP peptide. N = 5 animals per group. P values indicated were calculated by student t-test (****P < 0.0001 for 20 ppm cpd60 vs control diet; ####P < 0.0001 for 100 ppm cpd60 vs control diet).

References

    1. Scanlan MJ, et al. Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein alpha, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5657–5661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5657.
    1. Rettig WJ, et al. Cell-surface glycoproteins of human sarcomas: differential expression in normal and malignant tissues and cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:3110–3114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.9.3110.
    1. Rettig WJ, et al. Regulation and heteromeric structure of the fibroblast activation protein in normal and transformed cells of mesenchymal and neuroectodermal origin. Cancer Res. 1993;53:3327–3335.
    1. Henry LR, et al. Clinical implications of fibroblast activation protein in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1736–1741. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1746.
    1. Shi M, et al. Expression of fibroblast activation protein in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its clinicopathological significance. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:840–846. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i8.840.
    1. Ha SY, Yeo SY, Xuan YH, Kim SH. The prognostic significance of cancer-associated fibroblasts in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099955.
    1. Kim GJ, et al. Increased expression of CCN2, epithelial membrane antigen, and fibroblast activation protein in hepatocellular carcinoma with fibrous stroma showing aggressive behavior. PLoS One. 2014;9:e105094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105094.
    1. Chen, L., Qiu, X., Wang, X. & He, J. FAP positive fibroblasts induce immune checkpoint blockade resistance in colorectal cancer via promoting immunosuppression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.039 (2017).
    1. Milner JM, et al. Fibroblast activation protein alpha is expressed by chondrocytes following a pro-inflammatory stimulus and is elevated in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R23. doi: 10.1186/ar1877.
    1. Bauer S, et al. Fibroblast activation protein is expressed by rheumatoid myofibroblast-like synoviocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R171. doi: 10.1186/ar2080.
    1. Williams KH, et al. Lower serum fibroblast activation protein shows promise in the exclusion of clinically significant liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in diabetes and obesity. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108:466–472. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.024.
    1. Wang XM, et al. Fibroblast activation protein and chronic liver disease. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3168–3180. doi: 10.2741/2918.
    1. Levy MT, et al. Fibroblast activation protein: a cell surface dipeptidyl peptidase and gelatinase expressed by stellate cells at the tissue remodelling interface in human cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1999;29:1768–1778. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290631.
    1. Keane FM, et al. Quantitation of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-specific protease activity in mouse, baboon and human fluids and organs. FEBS Open Bio. 2013;4:43–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2013.12.001.
    1. Giuffrida P, Pinzani M, Corazza GR, Di Sabatino A. Biomarkers of intestinal fibrosis - one step towards clinical trials for stricturing inflammatory bowel disease. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:523–530. doi: 10.1177/2050640616640160.
    1. Rovedatti L, et al. Fibroblast activation protein expression in Crohn’s disease strictures. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1251–1253. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21446.
    1. Acharya PS, Zukas A, Chandan V, Katzenstein AL, Pure E. Fibroblast activation protein: a serine protease expressed at the remodeling interface in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:352–360. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.11.020.
    1. Egger C, et al. Effects of the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor, PT100, in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;809:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.05.022.
    1. Lopez JI, et al. Fibroblast activation protein predicts prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2016;54:100–105. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.03.009.
    1. Fan MH, et al. Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) Accelerates Collagen Degradation and Clearance from Lungs in Mice. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:8070–8089. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.701433.
    1. Santos AM, Jung J, Aziz N, Kissil JL, Pure E. Targeting fibroblast activation protein inhibits tumor stromagenesis and growth in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:3613–3625. doi: 10.1172/JCI38988.
    1. Gorrell, M. D. & Park, J. E. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes Vol. 1 (eds Rawlings, N. D. & Salvesen, G. S.) Ch. 750, 3395–3402 (Academic Press, 2013).
    1. Edosada CY, et al. Peptide substrate profiling defines fibroblast activation protein as an endopeptidase of strict Gly(2)-Pro(1)-cleaving specificity. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:1581–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.01.087.
    1. Rosenblum JS, Kozarich JW. Proyl peptidases: a serine protease subfamily with high potential for drug discovery. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003;7:496–504. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(03)00084-X.
    1. Edosada CY, et al. Selective inhibition of fibroblast activation protein protease based on dipeptide substrate specificity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:7437–7444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511112200.
    1. Pineiro-Sanchez ML, et al. Identification of the 170-kDa melanoma membrane-bound gelatinase (seprase) as a serine integral membrane protease. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:7595–7601. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7595.
    1. Lee KN, et al. Antiplasmin-cleaving enzyme is a soluble form of fibroblast activation protein. Blood. 2006;107:1397–1404. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3452.
    1. Sonoda, J., Chen, M. Z. & Baruch, A. FGF21-receptor agonists: an emerging therapeutic class for obesity-related diseases. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig30, 10.1515/hmbci-2017-0002 (2017).
    1. Coppage AL, et al. Human FGF-21 Is a Substrate of Fibroblast Activation Protein. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151269.
    1. Dunshee DR, et al. Fibroblast Activation Protein Cleaves and Inactivates Fibroblast Growth Factor 21. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:5986–5996. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.710582.
    1. Zhen EY, Jin Z, Ackermann BL, Thomas MK, Gutierrez JA. Circulating FGF21 proteolytic processing mediated by fibroblast activation protein. Biochem J. 2016;473:605–614. doi: 10.1042/BJ20151085.
    1. Schechter I, Berger A. On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1967;27:157–162. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(67)80055-X.
    1. Uitte de Willige S, Malfliet JJ, Janssen HL, Leebeek FW, Rijken DC. Increased N-terminal cleavage of alpha-2-antiplasmin in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:2029–2036. doi: 10.1111/jth.12396.
    1. Gorrell MD, et al. The Protease Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) in Liver Disease. Hepatology. 2014;60:592a–592a.
    1. Park JE, et al. Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:36505–36512. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36505.
    1. Niedermeyer J, et al. Targeted disruption of mouse fibroblast activation protein. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:1089–1094. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.3.1089-1094.2000.
    1. Narra K, et al. Phase II trial of single agent Val-boroPro (Talabostat) inhibiting Fibroblast Activation Protein in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:1691–1699. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.11.4874.
    1. Lee KN, Jackson KW, Christiansen VJ, Dolence EK, Mckee PA. Enhancement of fibrinolysis by inhibiting enzymatic cleavage of precursor alpha(2)-antiplasmin. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2011;9:987–996. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04195.x.
    1. Li JB, et al. Activatable Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for In Vivo Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein-alpha. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23:1704–1711. doi: 10.1021/bc300278r.
    1. Poplawski SE, et al. Identification of Selective and Potent Inhibitors of Fibroblast Activation Protein and Prolyl Oligopeptidase. J Med Chem. 2013;56:3467–3477. doi: 10.1021/jm400351a.
    1. Maes M, et al. Components of biological variation in prolyl endopeptidase and dipeptidyl-peptidase IV activity in plasma of healthy subjects. Clin Chem. 1994;40:1686–1691.
    1. Agusti-Cobos E, Tenorio-Laranga J. Enhancement of fibrinolysis by inhibiting enzymatic cleavage of precursor alpha(2)-antiplasmin: a rebuttal. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2011;9:1266–1267. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04294.x.
    1. Jansen K, et al. Extended structure-activity relationship and pharmacokinetic investigation of (4-quinolinoyl)glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) J Med Chem. 2014;57:3053–3074. doi: 10.1021/jm500031w.
    1. Venalainen JI, et al. Binding kinetics and duration of in vivo action of novel prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitors. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2006;71:683–692. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.11.029.
    1. Jarho EM, et al. A cyclopent-2-enecarbonyl group mimics proline at the P2 position of prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5605–5607. doi: 10.1021/jm049503w.
    1. Thoma R, et al. Structural basis of proline-specific exopeptidase activity as observed in human dipeptidyl peptidase-IV. Structure. 2003;11:947–959. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00160-6.
    1. Aertgeerts K, et al. Structural and kinetic analysis of the substrate specificity of human fibroblast activation protein alpha. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:19441–19444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C500092200.
    1. Fulop V, Szeltner Z, Renner V, Polgar L. Structures of prolyl oligopeptidase substrate/inhibitor complexes. Use of inhibitor binding for titration of the catalytic histidine residue. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:1262–1266.
    1. Szeltner Z, et al. Electrostatic environment at the active site of prolyl oligopeptidase is highly influential during substrate binding. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:48786–48793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309555200.
    1. Brunker P, et al. RG7386, a Novel Tetravalent FAP-DR5 Antibody, Effectively Triggers FAP-Dependent, Avidity-Driven DR5 Hyperclustering and Tumor Cell Apoptosis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15:946–957. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0647.
    1. Copeland, R. A. Enzymes: a practical introduction to structure, mechanism, and data analysis. 2nd edn, (J. Wiley, 2000).
    1. Sastry GM, Adzhigirey M, Day T, Annabhimoju R, Sherman W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013;27:221–234. doi: 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8.
    1. Harder E, et al. OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016;12:281–296. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00864.
    1. Sherman W, Day T, Jacobson MP, Friesner RA, Farid R. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. J Med Chem. 2006;49:534–553. doi: 10.1021/jm050540c.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa