Time course of efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine: Results from the randomized, double-blind ADVANCE trial

Todd J Schwedt, Richard B Lipton, Jessica Ailani, Stephen D Silberstein, Cristina Tassorelli, Hua Guo, Kaifeng Lu, Brett Dabruzzo, Rosa Miceli, Lawrence Severt, Michelle Finnegan, Joel M Trugman, Todd J Schwedt, Richard B Lipton, Jessica Ailani, Stephen D Silberstein, Cristina Tassorelli, Hua Guo, Kaifeng Lu, Brett Dabruzzo, Rosa Miceli, Lawrence Severt, Michelle Finnegan, Joel M Trugman

Abstract

Background: Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for the preventive treatment of migraine.

Methods: In the double-blind, phase 3 ADVANCE trial, participants with 4-14 migraine days/month were randomized to atogepant 10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. We evaluated the time course of efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine. Analyses included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days during each of the three 4-week treatment periods, change in weekly migraine days during weeks 1-4, and proportion of participants with a migraine on each day during the first week.

Results: We analyzed 873 participants (n = 214 atogepant 10 mg, n = 223 atogepant 30 mg, n = 222 atogepant 60 mg, n = 214 placebo). For weeks 1-4, mean change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days ranged from -3.1 to -3.9 across atogepant doses vs -1.6 for placebo (p < 0.0001). For weeks 5-8 and 9-12, reductions in mean monthly migraine days ranged from -3.7 to -4.2 for atogepant vs -2.9 for placebo (p ≤ 0.012) and -4.2 to -4.4 for atogepant vs -3.0 for placebo (p < 0.0002), respectively. Mean change from baseline in weekly migraine days in week 1 ranged from -0.77 to -1.03 for atogepant vs -0.29 with placebo (p < 0.0001). Percentages of participants reporting a migraine on post-dose day 1 ranged from 10.8% to 14.1% for atogepant vs 25.2% with placebo (p ≤ 0.0071).

Conclusion: Atogepant demonstrated treatment benefits as early as the first full day after treatment initiation, and sustained efficacy across each 4-week interval during the 12-week treatment period.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03777059.

Keywords: Atogepant; calcitonin gene–related peptide; efficacy; time course.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Todd J Schwedt serves on the Board of Directors for the American Headache Society and the International Headache Society. He has received research support from the American Migraine Foundation, Amgen, Henry Jackson Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and US Department of Defense. Within the past 12 months, he has received personal compensation for serving as a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie/Allergan, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Equinox, Lundbeck, and Novartis. He has received royalties from UpToDate. He holds stock options in Aural Analytics and Nocira.

Richard B Lipton has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, the FDA, and the National Headache Foundation. He serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria or research support from AbbVie/Allergan, Amgen, Biohaven, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (Promius), electroCore, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Lundbeck, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Vector, and Vedanta Research. He receives royalties from Wolff’s Headache, 8th edition (Oxford University Press, 2009), and Informa. He holds stock/options in Biohaven and Ctrl M.

Jessica Ailani has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Axsome, Ctrl M, Eli Lilly and Company, Lundbeck, Impel, Satsuma, Theranica, Teva, and Vorso; has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, Lundbeck, and Teva; has received honoraria from Medscape; and has provided editorial services to Current Pain and Headache Reports, NeurologyLive, and SELF magazine. Her institute has received clinical trial support from AbbVie, the American Migraine Foundation, Biohaven, Eli Lilly and Company, Satsuma, and Zosano.

Stephen D Silberstein is a consultant and/or advisory panel member for and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Amgen, Avanir, eNeura, electroCore Medical, Labrys Biologics, Medscape, Medtronic, Neuralieve, NINDS, Pfizer, and Teva. His employer receives research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, electroCore Medical, Labrys Biologics, Eli Lilly, Mars, and Troy Healthcare.

Cristina Tassorelli has participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, electroCore, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Teva. She has lectured at symposia sponsored by AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Teva. She is principal investigator or collaborator in clinical trials sponsored by Alder, Eli Lilly, IBSA, Novartis, and Teva. She has received research grants from the European Commission, the Italian Ministry of Health, the Italian Ministry of University, the Migraine Research Foundation, and the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation.

Hua Guo, Kaifeng Lu, Brett Dabruzzo, Rosa Miceli, Lawrence Severt, Michelle Finnegan and Joel M Trugman are employees of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change from baseline monthly migraine days during the treatment period (mITT population).*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; MMD, monthly migraine day; SE, standard error.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change from baseline in weekly migraine days during the first month of treatment (mITT population).*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; SE, standard error.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of participants with a migraine each day during the first week of treatmenta (mITT population). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. mITT, modified intent-to-treat. aDay 0 excluded, as migraine attacks occurring prior to study drug administration were included.

References

    1. Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, et al.. Life with migraine: Effects on relationships, career, and finances from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache 2019; 59: 1286–1299.
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al.. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68: 343–349.
    1. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD. Migraine prevention. Pract Neurol 2007; 7: 383–393.
    1. Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2015; 21: 973–989.
    1. American Headache Society. The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache 2019; 59: 1–18.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, et al.. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second international burden of migraine study (IBMS-II). Headache 2013; 53: 644–655.
    1. Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 2014; 20: 22–33.
    1. Gallagher RM, Kunkel R. Migraine medication attributes important for patient compliance: concerns about side effects may delay treatment. Headache 2003; 43: 36–43.
    1. Mitsikostas DD, Belesioti I, Arvaniti C, et al.. Patients' preferences for headache acute and preventive treatment. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 102.
    1. Peres MF, Silberstein S, Moreira F, et al.. Patients' preference for migraine preventive therapy. Headache 2007; 47: 540–545.
    1. Garza I, Swanson JW. Prophylaxis of migraine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2006; 2: 281–291.
    1. Delussi M, Vecchio E, Libro G, et al.. Failure of preventive treatments in migraine: an observational retrospective study in a tertiary headache center. BMC Neurol 2020; 20: 256.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, et al.. Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 2017; 97: 553–622.
    1. Durham PL. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and migraine. Headache 2006; 46: S3–S8.
    1. Guo S, Vollesen ALH, Olesen J, et al.. Premonitory and nonheadache symptoms induced by CGRP and PACAP38 in patients with migraine. Pain 2016; 157: 2773–2781.
    1. Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, et al.. CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 54–61.
    1. Hansen JM, Hauge AW, Olesen J, et al.. Calcitonin gene-related peptide triggers migraine-like attacks in patients with migraine with aura. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1179–1186.
    1. Charles A. The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 174–182.
    1. Dodick DW. CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: Evidence review and clinical implications. Cephalalgia 2019; 39: 445–458.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ailani J, et al.. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19: 727–737.
    1. Ailani J, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, et al.. Atogepant significantly reduces mean monthly migraine days in the phase 3 trial (ADVANCE) for the prevention of migraine [abstract MTV20-OR-018]. Cephalalgia 2020; 40: 15–16.
    1. Ashina M, Tepper S, Reuter U, et al.. Long-term safety and tolerability of atogepant 60 mg following once daily dosing over 1 year for the preventive treatment of migraine [abstract 2664]. Neurology 2021; 96: 2664.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1–211.
    1. Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld AM, et al.. Atogepant improved patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of activity impairment in migraine-diary and headache impact test in a 12-week, double-blind, randomized phase 3 (ADVANCE) trial for preventive treatment of migraine [abstract 1454]. Neurology 2021; 96: 1454.
    1. Dodick DW, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld AM, et al. . Atogepant improved patient-reported migraine-specific quality of life in a 12-week phase 3 (ADVANCE) trial for preventive treatment of migraine [abstract 1459]. Neurology 2021; 96: 1459.
    1. Detke HC, Millen BA, Zhang Q, et al.. Rapid onset of effect of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: analysis of the EVOLVE studies. Headache 2020; 60: 348–359.
    1. Winner PK, Spierings ELH, Yeung PP, et al.. Early onset of efficacy with fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Headache 2019; 59: 1743–1752.
    1. Dodick DW, Gottschalk C, Cady R, et al.. Eptinezumab demonstrated efficacy in sustained prevention of episodic and chronic migraine beginning on day 1 after dosing. Headache 2020; 60: 2220–2231.
    1. Schwedt T, Reuter U, Tepper S, et al.. Early onset of efficacy with erenumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2018; 19: 92.
    1. Croop R, Goadsby PJ, Stock DA, et al.. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394: 737–745.
    1. Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Ailani J, et al.. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2230–2241.
    1. Hargreaves R, Olesen J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulators – the history and renaissance of a new migraine drug class. Headache 2019; 59: 951–970.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa