Endovascular Thrombectomy for Mild Strokes: How Low Should We Go?

Amrou Sarraj, Ameer Hassan, Sean I Savitz, James C Grotta, Chunyan Cai, Kaushik N Parsha, Christine M Farrell, Bita Imam, Clark W Sitton, Sujan T Reddy, Haris Kamal, Nitin Goyal, Lucas Elijovich, Katelin Reishus, Rashi Krishnan, Navdeep Sangha, Abel Wu, Renata Costa, Ruqayyah Malik, Osman Mir, Rashedul Hasan, Lindsay M Snodgrass, Manuel Requena, Dion Graybeal, Michael Abraham, Michael Chen, Louise D McCullough, Marc Ribo, Amrou Sarraj, Ameer Hassan, Sean I Savitz, James C Grotta, Chunyan Cai, Kaushik N Parsha, Christine M Farrell, Bita Imam, Clark W Sitton, Sujan T Reddy, Haris Kamal, Nitin Goyal, Lucas Elijovich, Katelin Reishus, Rashi Krishnan, Navdeep Sangha, Abel Wu, Renata Costa, Ruqayyah Malik, Osman Mir, Rashedul Hasan, Lindsay M Snodgrass, Manuel Requena, Dion Graybeal, Michael Abraham, Michael Chen, Louise D McCullough, Marc Ribo

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is effective for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥6. However, EVT benefit for mild deficits large vessel occlusions (NIHSS, <6) is uncertain. We evaluated EVT efficacy and safety in mild strokes with large vessel occlusion. Methods- A retrospective cohort of patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and NIHSS <6 presenting within 24 hours from last seen normal were pooled. Patients were divided into 2 groups: EVT or medical management. Ninety-day mRS of 0 to 1 was the primary outcome, mRS of 0 to 2 was the secondary. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was the safety outcome. Clinical outcomes were compared through a multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for age, presentation NIHSS, time last seen normal to presentation, center, IV alteplase, Alberta Stroke Program early computed tomographic score, and thrombus location. We then performed propensity score matching as a sensitivity analysis. Results were also stratified by thrombus location. Results- Two hundred fourteen patients (EVT, 124; medical management, 90) were included from 8 US and Spain centers between January 2012 and March 2017. The groups were similar in age, Alberta Stroke Program early computed tomographic score, IV alteplase rate and time last seen normal to presentation. There was no difference in mRS of 0 to 1 between EVT and medical management (55.7% versus 54.4%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.64-2.64; P=0.47). Similar results were seen for mRS of 0 to 2 (63.3% EVT versus 67.8% medical management; adjusted odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.43-1.88; P=0.77). In a propensity matching analysis, there was no treatment effect in 62 matched pairs (53.5% EVT, 48.4% medical management; odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.54-2.52; P=0.69). There was no statistically significant difference when stratified by any thrombus location; M1 approached significance ( P=0.07). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were higher with thrombectomy (5.8% EVT versus 0% medical management; P=0.02). Conclusions- Our retrospective multicenter cohort study showed no improvement in excellent and independent functional outcomes in mild strokes (NIHSS, <6) receiving thrombectomy irrespective of thrombus location, with increased symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates, consistent with the guidelines recommending the treatment for NIHSS ≥6. There was a signal toward benefit with EVT only in M1 occlusions; however, this needs to be further evaluated in future randomized control trials.

Keywords: Spain; brain ischemia; humans; odds ratio; thrombectomy; thrombosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest and Disclosures

Amrou Sarraj is the Principal Investigator of the SELECT and SELECT 2 trials with unrestricted grant from Stryker Neurovascular; consultant, speaker bureau, and advisory board member for Stryker Neurovascular; as well as site PI for DEFUSE 3 trial which was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Michael Abraham is consultant for Stryker Neurovascular and Penumbra Inc. Michael Chen is consultant for Medtronic and Penumbra, as well as an advisory board member for Stryker Neurovascular and Genentech.

Figures

Figure 1A.
Figure 1A.
Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days compared between endovascular thrombectomy and medical management for all thrombus locations
Figure 1B.
Figure 1B.
Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days compared between endovascular thrombectomy and medical management for M1 thrombus location
Figure 1C.
Figure 1C.
Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days compared between endovascular thrombectomy and medical management for ICA thrombus location
Figure 1D.
Figure 1D.
Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days compared between endovascular thrombectomy and medical management for M2 thrombus location
Figure 2A.
Figure 2A.
Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days compared between endovascular thrombectomy and medical management for proximal (M1+ICA) thrombus location
Figure 2B.
Figure 2B.
Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days compared between endovascular thrombectomy and medical management for distal (M2+M3+M4+ACA) thrombus location

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa