A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidivarin as Add-on Therapy in Participants with Inadequately Controlled Focal Seizures

Martin J Brodie, Piotr Czapinski, Ladislav Pazdera, Josemir W Sander, Manuel Toledo, Mariana Napoles, Farhad Sahebkar, Ashley Schreiber, GWEP1330 Study Group, Tomas Nezadal, Jana Slonkova, Anna Altman, Kálmán Füle, Ágnes Horváth, Anna Kelemen, Sámuel Komoly, Marta Banach, Iwona Kurkowska-Jastrzebska, Paweł Lisewski, Merce Falip, Rodrigo Rocamora, Manny Bagary, Martin J Brodie, Piotr Czapinski, Ladislav Pazdera, Josemir W Sander, Manuel Toledo, Mariana Napoles, Farhad Sahebkar, Ashley Schreiber, GWEP1330 Study Group, Tomas Nezadal, Jana Slonkova, Anna Altman, Kálmán Füle, Ágnes Horváth, Anna Kelemen, Sámuel Komoly, Marta Banach, Iwona Kurkowska-Jastrzebska, Paweł Lisewski, Merce Falip, Rodrigo Rocamora, Manny Bagary

Abstract

Objective: We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cannabidivarin (CBDV) as add-on therapy in adults with inadequately controlled focal seizures. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty-two participants (CBDV n=81; placebo n=81) were enrolled. After a 4-week baseline, participants titrated from 400 to 800 mg CBDV twice daily (b.i.d.) (or placebo) over 2 weeks, followed by 6 weeks stable dosing (at 800 mg b.i.d.) and a 12-day taper period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in focal seizure frequency during the 8-week treatment period. Secondary endpoints included additional efficacy measures relating to seizures, physician- and participant-reported outcomes, change in the use of rescue medication, cognitive assessments, and safety. Results: Median baseline focal seizure frequencies were 17-18 per 28 days in both groups, and similar reductions in frequency were observed in the CBDV (40.5%) and placebo (37.7%) groups during the treatment period (treatment ratio [% reduction] CBDV/placebo: 0.95 [4.6]; confidence interval: 0.78-1.17 [-16.7 to 21.9]; p=0.648). There were no differences between the CBDV and placebo groups for any seizure subtype. There were no significant treatment differences between CBDV and placebo groups for any of the secondary efficacy outcome measures. Overall, 59 (72.8%) of participants in the CBDV group and 39 (48.1%) in the placebo group had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE); the 3 most common were diarrhea, nausea, and somnolence. The incidence of serious AEs was low (3.7% in the CBDV group vs. 1.2% in the placebo group). There was little or no effect of CBDV on vital signs, physical examination, or electrocardiogram findings. Elevations in serum transaminases (alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase) to levels >3×upper limit of normal occurred in three participants taking CBDV (two discontinued as a result) and one taking placebo; however, none met the criteria for potential Hy's Law cases. Conclusion: It is likely the 40.5% seizure reduction with CBDV represents an appropriate pharmacological response in this population with focal seizures. The placebo response was, however, high, which may reflect the participants' expectations of CBDV, and a treatment difference from placebo was not observed. CBDV was generally well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02365610.

Keywords: GWP42006; antiepileptic drug; cannabinoid; epilepsy.

Conflict of interest statement

M.N., F.S., and A.S. are employed by GW Research Ltd and hold share options in GW Research Ltd. L.P. has received consultation fees from GL Pharma, Mylan, Sandoz, and Vipharm. He has also received educational grants and support from Vipharm, GP Pharma, and Mylan. He has accepted honoraria and guest lecture fees for symposia and other events sponsored by Astellas, Lundbeck, Teva, Eisai, and GL Pharma. He has served as principal investigator for >50 sponsor-initiated studies, and has been a national coordinator and key opinion leader for Astellas. He has served as an expert witness and consultant for lawsuits, providing deposition and testimony, including analysis of medical documents. J.W.S. received research grants from UCB and personal fees from UCB and Zogenix outside the submitted work. P.C. has served mainly as principal investigator in 66 industry-sponsored clinical trials in epilepsy and migraine. In seven trials, he was country coordinator. He has co-organized 26 annual conferences, named Psychosocial Aspects of Epilepsy sponsored by Pfizer, Glaxo, and Sanofi in the past and UCB Pharma, Teva, Apotex, Mylan, Glenmark, Accord, and Novartis currently. He has accepted speaking fees for lectures and webinars sponsored by UCB Pharma.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Disposition of participants. aOne participant in the CBDV group discontinued treatment on day 32 due to an adverse event of severe diarrhea and did not restart treatment after adverse event resolution; however, they attended the end-of-treatment visit and was reported as completing the trial. CBDV, cannabidivarin; ITT, intention to treat.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Effect modifier analysis of primary efficacy: negative binomial regression effect modifier analysis of focal seizure count during baseline (per 28 days) and treatment (ITT analysis set). Concomitant ASM groups are as follows: Group 1: participants on inducer ASMs (and not on inhibitor ASMs); Group 2: participants on inhibitor ASMs (and not on inducer ASMs); Group 3: participants on ASMs that are neither inducer nor inhibitors; Group 4: patients on inducer and inhibitor ASMs. ASMs, antiseizure medications; CI, confidence interval; N/A, not applicable. *Correction added on April 15, 2021 after first online publication of February 13, 2021: In Fig. 2, (i) the ratio text values under Ratio (95% CI) for Sex factor level Female was incorrect as 1.94 and should be 0.94 and the ratio text values under Ratio (95% CI) for Concomitant ASM Group factor level Group 2 was incorrect as 1.75 and should be 0.75; (ii) the forest plot data points were incorrect for Number of previous ASMs factor level >6 and Weight Adjusted Dose Group factor level >25 mg/kg/day and have been revised; and (iii) in the Factor Level column, the Number of Concomitant ASMs factor level 3 was incorrect and should be ≥3. The figure has been corrected to reflect the correct values.

References

    1. Hillig KW, Mahlberg PG. A chemotaxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Am J Bot. 2004;91:966–975.
    1. Hill TD, Cascio MG, Romano B, et al. . Cannabidivarin-rich cannabis extracts are anticonvulsant in mouse and rat via a CB1 receptor-independent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170:679–692.
    1. Iannotti FA, Hill CL, Leo A, et al. . Nonpsychotropic plant cannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and cannabidiol (CBD), activate and desensitize transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels in vitro: potential for the treatment of neuronal hyperexcitability. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014;5:1131–1141.
    1. Huizenga MN, Sepulveda-Rodriguez A, Forcelli PA. Preclinical safety and efficacy of cannabidivarin for early life seizures. Neuropharmacology. 2019;148:189–198.
    1. Posner K, Brent D, Lucas C, et al. . Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York, NY, 2008.
    1. Allsop DJ, Norberg MM, Copeland J, et al. . The Cannabis Withdrawal Scale development: patterns and predictors of cannabis withdrawal and distress. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;119:123–129.
    1. Guekht AB, Korczyn AD, Bondareva IB, et al. . Placebo responses in randomized trials of antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17:64–69.
    1. Burneo JG, Montori VM, Faught E. Magnitude of the placebo effect in randomized trials of antiepileptic agents. Epilepsy Behav. 2002;3:532–534.
    1. Cramer JA, Fisher R, Ben-Menachem E, et al. . New antiepileptic drugs: comparison of key clinical trials. Epilepsia. 1999;40:590–600.
    1. Zaccara G, Giovannelli F, Cincotta M, et al. . Adverse events of placebo-treated, drug-resistant, focal epileptic patients in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2015;262:501–515.
    1. Goldenholz DM, Goldenholz SR. Response to placebo in clinical epilepsy trials—Old ideas and new insights. Epilepsy Res. 2016;122:15–25.
    1. French JA, Cabrera J, Emir B, et al. . Designing a new proof-of-principle trial for treatment of partial seizures to demonstrate efficacy with minimal sample size and duration-a case study. Epilepsy Res. 2013;106:230–223.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa