MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning Services (MOTIF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Chris Smith, Uk Vannak, Ly Sokhey, Thoai D Ngo, Judy Gold, Khemrin Khut, Phil Edwards, Tung Rathavy, Caroline Free, Chris Smith, Uk Vannak, Ly Sokhey, Thoai D Ngo, Judy Gold, Khemrin Khut, Phil Edwards, Tung Rathavy, Caroline Free

Abstract

Background: Providing women with contraceptive methods following abortion is important to reduce repeat abortion rates, yet evidence for effective post-abortion family planning interventions are limited. This protocol outlines the evaluation of a mobile phone-based intervention using voice messages to support post-abortion family planning in Cambodia.

Methods/design: A single blind randomised controlled trial of 500 participants. Clients aged 18 or over, attending for abortion at four Marie Stopes International clinics in Cambodia, owning a mobile phone and not wishing to have a child at the current time are randomised to the mobile phone-based intervention or control (standard care) with a 1:1 allocation ratio.The intervention comprises a series of six automated voice messages to remind clients about available family planning methods and provide a conduit for additional support. Clients can respond to message prompts to request a phone call from a counsellor, or alternatively to state they have no problems. Clients requesting to talk to a counsellor, or who do not respond to the message prompts, receive a call from a Marie Stopes International Cambodia counsellor who provides individualised advice and support regarding family planning. The duration of the intervention is 3 months. The control group receive existing standard of care without the additional mobile phone-based support.We hypothesise that the intervention will remind clients about contraceptive methods available, identify problems with side effects early and provide support, and therefore increase use of post-abortion family planning, while reducing discontinuation and unsafe method switching.Participants are assessed at baseline and at 4 months. The primary outcome measure is use of an effective modern contraceptive method at 4 months post abortion. Secondary outcome measures include contraception use, pregnancy and repeat abortion over the 4-month post-abortion period.Risk ratios will be used as the measure of effect of the intervention on the outcomes, and these will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals. All analyses will be based on the 'intention to treat' principle.

Discussion: This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a mobile phone-based intervention using voice messages to support contraception use in a population with limited literacy. Findings could be generalisable to similar populations in different settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01823861.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram of study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of conceptual framework.

References

    1. Guttmacher Institute. Facts on Induced Abortion Worldwide [Internet]. Most. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2012. ]
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Henshaw S, Bankole A. Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet. 2012;14:625–632. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8.
    1. World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008 [Internet] 2008. [ ]
    1. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2010. Health (San Francisco) 2010. [ ]
    1. Fetters T, Samandari G. An estimate of safe and unsafely induced abortion in Cambodia. Marrakech: XXVI International Population Conference of the IUSSP; 2009.
    1. Kemp S. Social, Digital and Mobile in Cambodia. We are Social. [cited 2013 Jun 24] [ ]
    1. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;14:e1001362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362.
    1. Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, Whittaker R, Edwards P, Zhou W, Rodgers A, Cairns J, Kenward MG, Roberts A. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;14:49–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60701-0.
    1. Horvath T, Azman H, Ge K, Gw R. Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;14:CD009756.
    1. Kirby D, Raine T, Thrush G, Yuen C, Sokoloff A, Potter S. Impact of an intervention to improve contraceptive use through follow-up phone calls to female adolescent clinic patients. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;14:251–257. doi: 10.1363/4225110.
    1. Hou MY, Hurwitz S, Kavanagh E, Fortin J, Goldberg AB. Using daily text-message reminders to improve adherence with oral contraceptives: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;14:633–640. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eb6b0f.
    1. Castano P, Bynum J, Andre R, Lara M, Westhoff C. Effect of daily text messages on oral contraceptive continuation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;14:14–20. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d4167.
    1. Constant D, de Tolley K. The use of a package of information, self-assessment and support as an alternative to follow-up visits after medical abortion and to strengthen family planning messages [Internet] 2010. [ ]
    1. Bullen P. Operational challenges in the Cambodian mHealth revolvution. J Mobile Technol Med. 2013;14:20–23.
    1. Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, Kariri A, Karanja S, Chung MH, Jack W, Habyarimana J, Sadatsafavi M, Najafzadeh M, Marra CA, Estambale B, Ngugi E, Ball TB, Thabane L, Gelmon LJ, Kimani J, Ackers M, Plummer FA. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;14:1838–1845. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61997-6.
    1. Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;14:61–91. doi: 10.2307/1966669.
    1. Blanc AK, Curtis S, Croft T. Does contraceptive discontinuation matter? Quality of care and fertility consequences [Internet]. Measure Evaluation. Measure Evaluation. 1999. [ ]
    1. World Health Organization. Family Planning: a global handbook for providers [Internet] 2011. [ ]
    1. Hall K, O’Connell White K, Reame N, Westhoff C. Studying the use of oral contraception: a review of measurement approaches. J Womens Health. 2010;14:2203–2209. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.1963.
    1. Stuart GS, Grimes DA. Social desirability bias in family planning studies: a neglected problem. Contraception. 2009;14:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.009.
    1. Rothman KJ. Epidemiological evidence on health risks of cellular telephones. Lancet. 2000;14:1837–1840. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03244-X. [ ]
    1. Bradley S, Schwandt H, Khan S. Levels, Trends, and Reasons for contraceptive discontinuation. DHS Analytical studies 20. Health (San Francisco) Calverton, MD: ICF Macro; 2009.
    1. Ministry of Health, KfW Development Bank, Domrei Research and Consulting. Family Planning Survey: Contraception among married women of reproductive age in Cambodia. Phnom Penh; 2005. [ ]
    1. Canto De Cetina TE, Canto P, Ordoñez Luna M. Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception. 2001;14:143–146. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00181-0.
    1. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2013.
    1. National Institute for Health Research. Good Clinical Practice. 2011. [ ]
    1. Smith C. MOTIF: MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning. . 2013 (cited 9 April 2013). [ ]
    1. L’engle KL, Vahdat HL, Ndakidemi E, Lasway C, Zan T. Evaluating feasibility, reach and potential impact of a text message family planning information service in Tanzania. Contraception. 2013;14:251–256. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.009.
    1. CycleTel. Family Planning via Mobile Phones [Internet] Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute; 2011. [ ]
    1. Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action. MAMA. Washington, DC: MAMA; 2013. [ ]

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa