Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire Thai version

Punjaporn Waleeprakhon, Pichai Ittasakul, Manote Lotrakul, Pattarabhorn Wisajun, Sudawan Jullagate, Terence A Ketter, Punjaporn Waleeprakhon, Pichai Ittasakul, Manote Lotrakul, Pattarabhorn Wisajun, Sudawan Jullagate, Terence A Ketter

Abstract

Background: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) has been translated to many languages and has been used in many countries as a screening instrument for bipolar disorder. The main objective of this study was to evaluate validity of the Thai version of the MDQ as a screening instrument for bipolar disorder in a psychiatric outpatient sample, and to determine its optimum question #1 item threshold value for bipolar disorder.

Methods: The English language Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) was translated into Thai. The process involved back-translation, cross-cultural adaptation, field testing of the prefinal version, as well as final adjustments. Two hundred and fifty major depressive disorder outpatients were further assessed by the Thai version of the MDQ and the Thai version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). During the assessment, reliability and validity analyses, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were performed.

Results: The Thai version of the MDQ screening had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha =0.791, omega total =0.68, and omega hierarchical =0.69). The optimal question #1 item threshold value was at least five positive items, which yielded adequate sensitivity (76.5%), specificity (72.7%), positive predictive value (74.3%), and negative predictive value (75.0%). The ROC area under the curve (AUC) for this study was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.90).

Conclusion: The Thai version of the MDQ had some useful psychometric properties for screening for bipolar disorder in a mood disorder clinic setting, with a recommended question #1 item threshold value of at least five positive items.

Keywords: Thai MDQ; cutoff point; predictive validity; reliability; screening test.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensitivity and specificity of the MDQ for bipolar disorder at different cutoffs. Notes: Area under the curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.70–0.90, P<0.0001). Abbreviation: MDQ, Mood Disorder Questionnaire.

References

    1. Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. Manic-Depressive Illness: Bipolar Disorders and Recurrent Depression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.
    1. World Health Organization . The World Health Report 2001 Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Ketter TA, editor. Handbook of Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorders. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2010.
    1. Hirschfeld RM, Lewis L, Vornik LA. Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: how far have we really come? Results of the national depressive and manic-depressive association 2000 survey of individuals with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(2):161–174.
    1. Ghaemi SN, Boiman EE, Goodwin FK. Diagnosing bipolar disorder and the effect of antidepressants: a naturalistic study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(10):804–808. quiz 809.
    1. Ghaemi SN, Sachs GS, Chiou AM, Pandurangi AK, Goodwin K. Is bipolar disorder still underdiagnosed? Are antidepressants overutilized? J Affect Disord. 1999;52(1–3):135–144.
    1. Goldberg JF, Ernst CL. Features associated with the delayed initiation of mood stabilizers at illness onset in bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(11):985–991.
    1. Pacchiarotti I, Bond DJ, Baldessarini RJ, et al. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(11):1249–1262.
    1. Lish JD, Dime-Meenan S, Whybrow PC, Price RA, Hirschfeld RM. The National Depressive and Manic-depressive Association (DMDA) survey of bipolar members. J Affect Disord. 1994;31(4):281–294.
    1. Hirschfeld RM, Williams JB, Spitzer RL, et al. Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(11):1873–1875.
    1. Zaratiegui R, Lorenzo LS, Vázquez GH. Validation of the Argentine version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Vertex. 2011;22(97):165–171. Spanish.
    1. de Sousa Gurgel W, Rebouças DB, Negreiros de Matos KJ, Carneiro AH, Gomes de Matos e Souza F, Grupo de Estudos em Transtornos Afetivos Affective Disorders Study Group Brazilian Portuguese validation of Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Compr Psychiatry. 2012;53(3):308–312.
    1. Yang HC, Yuan CM, Liu TB, et al. Validity of the Chinese version Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the optimal cutoff screening bipolar disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2011;189(3):446–450.
    1. Sanchez-Moreno J, Villagran JM, Gutierrez JR, et al. EDHIPO (Hypomania Detection Study) Group Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for the detection of bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2008;10(3):400–412.
    1. Twiss J, Jones S, Anderson I. Validation of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for screening for bipolar disorder in a UK sample. J Affect Disord. 2008;110(1–2):180–184.
    1. Lin CJ, Shiah IS, Chu H, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011;25(1):53–62.
    1. Hirschfeld RM, Holzer C, Calabrese JR, et al. Validity of the mood disorder questionnaire: a general population study. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(1):178–180.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):S22–S33. quiz S34–S57.
    1. Kittirattanapaiboon P, Khamwongpin M. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.)-Thai version. Journal of Mental Health of Thailand. 2005;13(3):126–136.
    1. Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):145–154.
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. Scaling responses; pp. 28–53.
    1. Chung KF, Tso KC, Cheung E, Wong M. Validation of the Chinese version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in a psychiatric population in Hong Kong. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;62(4):464–471.
    1. Konuk N, Kiran S, Tamam L, Karaahmet E, Aydin H, Atik L. Validation of the Turkish version of the mood disorder questionnaire for screening bipolar disorders. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2007;18(2):147–154. Turkish.
    1. Gan Z, Han Z, Li K, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the “Mood Disorder Questionnaire” for screening bipolar disorder among patients with a current depressive episode. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:8.
    1. Weber Rouget B, Gervasoni N, Dubuis V, Gex-Fabry M, Bondolfi G, Aubry JM. Screening for bipolar disorders using a French version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) J Affect Disord. 2005;88(1):103–108.
    1. Zimmerman M, Galione JN, Ruggero CJ, et al. Screening for bipolar disorder and finding borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(9):1212–1217.
    1. Zimmerman M, Galione JN, Chelminski I, Young D, Dalrymple K. Psychiatric diagnoses in patients who screen positive on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: Implications for using the scale as a case-finding instrument for bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2011;185(3):444–449.
    1. Hirschfeld RM. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire: A simple, patient-rated screening instrument for bipolar disorder. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;4(1):9–11.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa