Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people

Irene Drubbel, Mattijs E Numans, Guido Kranenburg, Nienke Bleijenberg, Niek J de Wit, Marieke J Schuurmans, Irene Drubbel, Mattijs E Numans, Guido Kranenburg, Nienke Bleijenberg, Niek J de Wit, Marieke J Schuurmans

Abstract

Background: To better accommodate for the complex care needs of frail, older people, general practitioners must be capable of easily identifying frailty in daily clinical practice, for example, by using the frailty index (FI). To explore whether the FI is a valid and adequate screening instrument for primary care, we conducted a systematic review of its psychometric properties.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane, PubMed and Embase databases and included original studies focusing on the criterion validity, construct validity and responsiveness of the FI when applied in community-dwelling older people. We evaluated the quality of the studies included using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. This systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA statement.

Results: Of the twenty studies identified, eighteen reported on FIs derived from research data, one reported upon an FI derived from an administrative database of home-care clients, and one reported upon an FI derived from routine primary care data. In general, the FI showed good criterion and construct validity but lacked studies on responsiveness. When compared with studies that used data gathered for research purposes, there are indications that the FI mean score and range might be different in datasets using routine primary care data; however, this finding needs further investigation.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the FI is a valid frailty screening instrument. However, further research using routine Electronic Medical Record data is necessary to investigate whether the psychometric properties of the FI are generalizable to a primary care setting and to facilitate its interpretation and implementation in daily clinical practice.

Trial registration: PROSPERO systematic review register number: CRD42013003737.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of search results.

References

    1. De Lepeleire J, Degryse J, Illiffe S, Mann E, Buntinx F. Family physicians need easy instruments for frailty. Age Ageing. 2008;14:484–485. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn115.
    1. Moorhouse P, Rockwood K. Frailty and its quantitative clinical evaluation. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2012;14:333–340.
    1. Lacas A, Rockwood K. Frailty in primary care: a review of its conceptualization and implications for practice. BMC Med. 2012;14:4. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-4.
    1. Loo TS, Davis RB, Lipsitz LA, Irish J, Bates CK, Agarwal K, Markson L, Hamel MB. Electronic medical record reminders and panel management to improve primary care of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 2011;14:1552–1558. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.394.
    1. Heuberger RA. The frailty syndrome: a comprehensive review. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;14:315–368. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2011.623931.
    1. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Scientific World J. 2001;14:323–36.
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;14:722–727. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.722.
    1. Hoogendijk EO, van der Horst HE, Deeg DJ, Frijters DH, Prins BA, Jansen AP, Nijpels G, van Hout HP. The identification of frail older adults in primary care: Comparing the accuracy of five simple instruments. Age Ageing. 2013;14:262–265. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs163.
    1. Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B. Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: A systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;14:189–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00797.x.
    1. Pijpers E, Ferreira I, Stehouwer CD, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman AC. The frailty dilemma. review of the predictive accuracy of major frailty scores. Eur J Int Med. 2012;14:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.09.003.
    1. Sternberg SA, Wershof Schwartz A, Karunananthan S, Bergman H, Mark Clarfield A. The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;14:2129–2138. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x.
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;14:752–762. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9.
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty defined by deficit accumulation and geriatric medicine defined by frailty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;14:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.008.
    1. De Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JS, Olde Rikkert MG, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;14:104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001.
    1. Rockwood K. What would make a definition of frailty successful? Age Ageing. 2005;14:432–434. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi146.
    1. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
    1. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;14:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
    1. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Cote P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;14:280–286. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009.
    1. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008;14:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-24.
    1. Cigolle CT, Ofstedal MB, Tian Z, Blaum CS. Comparing models of frailty: The health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;14:830–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02225.x.
    1. Armstrong JJ, Stolee P, Hirdes JP, Poss JW. Examining three frailty conceptualizations in their ability to predict negative outcomes for home-care clients. Age Ageing. 2010;14:755–758. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq121.
    1. Drubbel I, de Wit NJ, Bleijenberg N, Eijkemans RJ, Schuurmans MJ, Numans ME. Prediction of adverse health outcomes in older people using a frailty index based on routine primary care data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;14:301–308. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls161.
    1. Gu D, Dupre ME, Sautter J, Zhu H, Liu Y, Yi Z. Frailty and mortality among Chinese at advanced ages. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;14:279–289.
    1. Kulminski AM, Ukraintseva SV, Kulminskaya IV, Arbeev KG, Land K, Yashin AI. Cumulative deficits better characterize susceptibility to death in elderly people than phenotypic frailty: lessons from the cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;14:898–903. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01656.x.
    1. Kulminski A, Yashin A, Arbeev K, Akushevich I, Ukraintseva S, Land K, Manton K. Cumulative index of health disorders as an indicator of aging-associated processes in the elderly: results from analyses of the national long term care survey. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;14:250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.12.004.
    1. Lucicesare A, Hubbard RE, Fallah N, Forti P, Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Ravaglia G, Rockwood K. Comparison of two frailty measures in the conselice study of brain ageing. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14:278–281. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0061-6.
    1. Lucicesare A, Hubbard RE, Searle SD, Rockwood K. An index of self-rated health deficits in relation to frailty and adverse outcomes in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010;14:255–260. doi: 10.1007/BF03324805.
    1. Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;14:738–743. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.738.
    1. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;14:681–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02764.x.
    1. Woo J, Leung J, Morley JE. Comparison of frailty indicators based on clinical phenotype and the multiple deficit approach in predicting mortality and physical limitation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;14:1478–1486. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04074.x.
    1. Woo J, Goggins W, Sham A, Ho SC. Public health significance of the frailty index. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;14:515–521. doi: 10.1080/09638280500215867.
    1. Fang X, Shi J, Song X, Mitnitski A, Tang Z, Wang C, Yu P, Rockwood K. Frailty in relation to the risk of falls, fractures, and mortality in older chinese adults: results from the Beijing longitudinal study of aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;14:1–5.
    1. Garcia-Gonzalez JJ, Garcia-Pena C, Franco-Marina F, Gutierrez-Robledo LM. A frailty index to predict the mortality risk in a population of senior Mexican adults. BMC Geriatr. 2009;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-9-47.
    1. Mitnitski A, Song X, Skoog I, Broe GA, Cox JL, Grunfeld E, Rockwood K. Relative fitness and frailty of elderly men and women in developed countries and their relationship with mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;14:2184–2189. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00506.x.
    1. Shi J, Song X, Yu P, Tang Z, Mitnitski A, Fang X, Rockwood K. Analysis of frailty and survival from late middle age in the Beijing longitudinal study of aging. BMC Geriatr. 2011;14:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-17.
    1. Theou O, Rockwood MR, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Disability and co-morbidity in relation to frailty: How much do they overlap? Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;14:e1–e8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.001.
    1. Hogan DB, Freiheit EA, Strain LA, Patten SB, Schmaltz HN, Rolfson D, Maxwell CJ. Comparing frailty measures in their ability to predict adverse outcome among older residents of assisted living. BMC Geriatr. 2012;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-56.
    1. Hirdes JP, Frijters DH, Teare GF. The MDS-CHESS scale. A new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;14:96–100. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51017.x.
    1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;14:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22. 2288-10-22.
    1. Laupacis A, Wells G, Richardson WS, Tugwell P. Users’ guides to the medical literature. V. how to use an article about prognosis. evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA. 1994;14:234–237. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520030076032.
    1. Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 1998;14:140–144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140.
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;14:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty, fitness, and the mathematics of deficit accumulation. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2007;14:1–12.
    1. Hubbard RE, Lang IA, Llewellyn DJ, Rockwood K. Frailty, body mass index, and abdominal obesity in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;14:377–381.
    1. Hubbard RE, Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Effect of smoking on the accumulation of deficits, frailty and survival in older adults: a secondary analysis from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;14:468–472. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0085-y.
    1. Wang C, Song X, Mitnitski A, Yu P, Fang X, Tang Z, Shi J, Rockwood K. Gender differences in the relationship between smoking and frailty: Results from the Beijing longitudinal study of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;14:338–346. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls166.
    1. Andrew MK, Fisk JD, Rockwood K. Psychological well-being in relation to frailty: A frailty identity crisis? Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;14:1347–1353. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000269.
    1. Andrew MK, Rockwood K. Psychiatric illness in relation to frailty in community-dwelling elderly people without dementia: a report from the canadian study of health and aging. Can J Aging. 2007;14:33–38. doi: 10.3138/8774-758W-702Q-2531.
    1. Fallah N, Mitnitski A, Searle SD, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. Transitions in frailty status in older adults in relation to mobility: a multistate modeling approach employing a deficit count. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;14:524–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03300.x.
    1. Mitnitski AB, Fallah N, Rockwood K. Changes in cognition in relation to frailty in older canadians. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;14:391.
    1. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Frailty and alzheimer’s disease in older men and women: results from a population-based study. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;14:129.
    1. Shega JW, Dale W, Andrew M, Paice J, Rockwood K, Weiner DK. Persistent pain and frailty: a case for homeostenosis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;14:113–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03769.x.
    1. Tajar A, O’Connell MD, Mitnitski AB, O'Neill TW, Searle SD, Huhtaniemi IT, Finn JD, Bartfai G, Boonen S, Casanueva FF, Forti G, Giwercman A, Han TS, Kula K, Labrie F, Lean ME, Pendleton N, Punab M, Silman AJ, Vanderschueren D, Rockwood K, Wu FC. European Male Aging Study Group. Frailty in relation to variations in hormone levels of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in older men: results from the European male aging study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;14:814–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03398.x.
    1. Lang IA, Hubbard RE, Andrew MK, Llewellyn DJ, Melzer D, Rockwood K. Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and frailty in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;14:1776–1780. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02480.x.
    1. Song X, MacKnight C, Latta R, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K. Frailty and survival of rural and urban seniors: results from the Canadian study of health and aging. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007;14:145–153. doi: 10.1007/BF03324681.
    1. Yu P, Song X, Shi J, Mitnitski A, Tang Z, Fang X, Rockwood K. Frailty and survival of older Chinese adults in urban and rural areas: results from the Beijing longitudinal study of aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;14:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.04.020.
    1. Woo J, Goggins W, Sham A, Ho SC. Social determinants of frailty. Gerontology. 2005;14:402–408. doi: 10.1159/000088705.
    1. Goggins WB, Woo J, Sham A, Ho SC. Frailty index as a measure of biological age in a Chinese population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;14:1046–1051. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.8.1046.
    1. Mitnitski A, Bao L, Rockwood K. Going from bad to worse: a stochastic model of transitions in deficit accumulation, in relation to mortality. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;14:490–493. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.01.007.
    1. Kahn NA, Visscher S, Verheij RA. The quality of the electronic medical records of general practitioners. (report in Dutch - de kwaliteit van het elektronisch patiëntendossier van huisartsen gemeten) NIVEL: Utrecht; 2011.
    1. Soler JK, Pringle M. Research using electronic patient records in general practice. The EGPRN meeting in Bertinoro, Italy, May 2009. Eur J Gen Pract. 2010;14:186–189. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2010.501374.
    1. Lamberts HWM. ICPC international classification of primary care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
    1. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2011. Oslo; 2010.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa