Early intervention program for very low birth weight preterm infants and their parents: a study protocol

Rita C Silveira, Eliane Wagner Mendes, Rubia Nascimento Fuentefria, Nadia Cristina Valentini, Renato S Procianoy, Rita C Silveira, Eliane Wagner Mendes, Rubia Nascimento Fuentefria, Nadia Cristina Valentini, Renato S Procianoy

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants are high risk for delayed neurodevelopment. The main goal is to develop a program of early intervention for very preterm infants that allows families to apply it continuously at home, and quantify the results of early parental stimulation on improvement of cognition and motor skills.

Methods: Randomized clinical Trial including inborn preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks or birth weight less than 1500 g at 48 h after birth. Eligible for begin the intervention up to 7 days after birth. Study Protocol approved by the Brazilian national Committee of ethics in Research and by the institutional ethics committee. Intervention group (IG): skin-to skin care by mother (kangaroo care) plus tactile-kinesthetic stimulation by mothers from randomization until hospital discharge when they receive a program of early intervention with 10 parents' orientation and a total of 10 home visits independently of the standard evaluation and care that will be performed. Systematic early intervention program will be according to developmental milestones, anticipating in a month evolutionary step acquisition of motor and / or cognitive expected for corrected age. Active comparator with a Conventional Group (CG): standard care according to the routine care of the NICU and their needs in the follow up program. Neurodevelopment outcome with blinded evaluations in both groups between 12 and 18 months by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development third edition and Alberta Motor Infant scale will be performed. All evaluations will be conducted in the presence of parents or caregivers in a safe room for the child move around during the evaluation.

Discussion: If we can show that a continuous and global early intervention at home performed by low income families is better than the standard care for very preterm infants, this kind of program may be applied elsewhere in the world. We received grants by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, DECIT, Cnpq and Health Ministry. Grand Challenges Brazil: All Children Thriving.

Trial registration: The study was restrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov . in July 15 2016 ( NCT02835612 ).

Keywords: Early intervention; Massage therapy by the mother; Neurodevelopment; Preterm; Skin-to-skin care; Very low birth weight infants; parent’s program.

Conflict of interest statement

We have different consent form given to participants (parents or guardians); one consent form before and another after randomization for all participants. This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Clinicas of Porto Alegre (GPPG 150606;CAAE 508306115000005327.

Not applicable.

The authors declare that have no competing of interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart. The flow chart of enrolment, allocation, intervention and assessment. *Intervention Group has ten additional appointments for systematic orientation for a continuous global simulation at home and ten home visits

References

    1. March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born too Soon : The global action report on preterm birth. World Health Organization. Geneva, 2012.
    1. Guinsburg R, de Almeida MF, de Castro JS, Silveira RC, Caldas JP, Fiori HH, et al. Death or survival with major morbidity in VLBW infants born at Brazilian neonatal research network centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;2:1–5.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Follow-up care of high-risk infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1377–1397. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.506.
    1. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Poole WK, McDonald SA. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants <32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998. Pediatrics. 2005;116:635–643. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2247.
    1. Spittle A, Orion J, Anderson P, Boyd R, Doyle LW. Early developmental intervention programmes post-hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; issue 12 Art n :CD005495
    1. Landsem IP, Handegård BH, Tunby J, Ulvund SE, Rønning JA. Early intervention program reduces stress in parents of preterms during childhood, a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:387. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-387.
    1. Morgan C, Novak I, Badawi N. Enriched environments and motor outcomes in cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132(3):e735–e746. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3985.
    1. Melnyk BM, Alpert-Gillis L, Feinstein NF, Fairbanks E, Czarniak-Schultz N, Hust D, et al. Improving cognitive development of low-birth-weight premature infants with the COPE program: a pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(5):373–389. doi: 10.1002/nur.1038.
    1. Field T. Preterm infant massage therapy studies: an American approach. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:487–494. doi: 10.1053/siny.2002.0153.
    1. Marlow N. Neurocognitive outcome after very preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F224–F228. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.019752.
    1. Anderson P, Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA. 2003;289:3264–3272. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.24.3264.
    1. Seidman G, Unnikrishnan S, Kenny E, Myslinski S, Cairns-Smith S, Mulligan B, Engmann C. Barriers and enablers of kangaroo mother care practice: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125643.
    1. Barros FC, Bhutta ZA, Batra M, et al. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S3.
    1. Valentini NC, Saccani R. Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta: validação para uma população gaúcha. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2011;29(2):231–238. doi: 10.1590/S0103-05822011000200015.
    1. Bayley N. Manual for the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2006.
    1. Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Normal psychomotor development. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;111:3–15. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00001-4.
    1. Bond C. Positive touch and massage in the neonatal unit: a British approach. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:477–486. doi: 10.1053/siny.2002.0149.
    1. Litmanovitz I, Dolfin T, Friedland O, Arnon S, Regev R, Shainkin-Kestenbaum R, et al. Early physical activity intervention prevents decrease of bone strength in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112:15–19. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.15.
    1. Mendes EW, Procianoy RS. Massage therapy reduces hospital stay and occurrence of late-onset sepsis in very preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2008;28:815–830. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.108.
    1. Terra L, Hauck S, Schestatsky S, Fillipon AP, Sanchez P, Hirakata V, Ceitlin LH. Confirmatory factor analysis of the parental bonding instrument in a Brazilian female population. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43:348–354. doi: 10.1080/00048670902721053.
    1. Procianoy RS, Mendes EW, Silveira RC. Massage therapy improves neurodevelopment outcome at two years corrected age for very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(1):7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.12.001.
    1. Petersen MC, Kube DA, Palmer FB. Classification of developmental delays. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 1998;5:2–14. doi: 10.1016/S1071-9091(98)80012-0.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleža-Jerić K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Badawi N. Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0347-2.
    1. Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Guzzetta A, Badawi N. GAME (Goals - Activity - Motor Enrichment): protocol of a single blind randomised controlled trial of motor training, parent education and environmental enrichment for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:203. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0203-2.
    1. Roberts MY, Kaiser AP, Wolfe CE, Bryant JD, Spidalieri AM. Effects of the teach-model-coach-review instructional approach on caregiver use of language support strategies and children's expressive language skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(5):1851–1869. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0113.
    1. Biringen Z, Derscheid D, Vliegen N, Closson L, Easterbrooks MA. Emotional availability (EA): theoretical background, empirical research using the EA scales, and clinical applications. Dev Rev. 2012;34(2):114–167. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2014.01.002.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa