The I-MICRO trial, Ilomedin for treatment of septic shock with persistent microperfusion defects: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Matthieu Legrand, Hafid Ait Oufella, Daniel De Backer, Jacques Duranteau, Marc Leone, Bruno Levy, Patrick Rossignol, Eric Vicaut, François Dépret, I-MICRO trial investigators, François Depret, Jean-Michel Constantin, Hafid Ait Oufella, Daniel De Backer, Bruno Levy, Marc Leone, Jacques Dureanteau, Samuel Gaugain, Jules Audart, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Bruno Megarbane, Julien Pottecher, Romain Sonneville, Thomas Rimmele, Carole Ichai, Antoine Vieillard, Alexy Tran Dinh, Cécile Aubron, Arnaud Mari, Vincent Labbe, Gaetan Plantefeve, Anne Laure Fedou, Damien Barraud, Stéphane Gaudry, Helene Nougue, Matthieu Legrand, Hafid Ait Oufella, Daniel De Backer, Jacques Duranteau, Marc Leone, Bruno Levy, Patrick Rossignol, Eric Vicaut, François Dépret, I-MICRO trial investigators, François Depret, Jean-Michel Constantin, Hafid Ait Oufella, Daniel De Backer, Bruno Levy, Marc Leone, Jacques Dureanteau, Samuel Gaugain, Jules Audart, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Bruno Megarbane, Julien Pottecher, Romain Sonneville, Thomas Rimmele, Carole Ichai, Antoine Vieillard, Alexy Tran Dinh, Cécile Aubron, Arnaud Mari, Vincent Labbe, Gaetan Plantefeve, Anne Laure Fedou, Damien Barraud, Stéphane Gaudry, Helene Nougue

Abstract

Background: Septic shock remains a significant cause of death in critically ill patients. During septic shock, some patients will retain microcirculatory disorders despite optimal hemodynamic support (i.e., fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes). Alterations in the microcirculation are a key pathophysiological factor of organ dysfunction and death in septic shock patients. Ilomedin is a prostacyclin analog with vasodilatory effect and anti-thrombotic properties (i.e., inhibition of platelet aggregation) preferentially at the microcirculatory level. We hypothesize that early utilization of intravenous Ilomedin in septic shock patients with clinical persistence of microperfusion disorders would improve the recovery of organ dysfunction.

Methods: The I-MICRO trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. We plan to recruit 236 adult patients with septic shock and persistent microcirculatory disorders (i.e., skin mottling or increased capillary refill time) despite hemodynamic support. Participants will be randomized to receive a 48-h intravenous infusion of either Ilomedin or placebo starting at the earliest 6 h and later 24 h after septic shock. The primary outcome will be the change (delta) of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score between randomization and day 7. Secondary outcomes will include mean SOFA score during the first 7 days after randomization, mortality at day 28 post-randomization, number of ventilation-free survival days in the 28 days post-randomization, number of renal replacement therapy-free survival days in the 28 days post-randomization, number of vasopressor-free survival days in the 28 days post-randomization, and mottling score at day 1 after randomization.

Discussion: The trial aims to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of Ilomedin in patients with septic shock and persistent microcirculatory disorders.

Trial registration: NCT NCT03788837 . Registered on 28 December 2018.

Keywords: Capillary refill time; Iloprost; Microcirculation; Outcome; Prostacyclin; Sepsis; Skin mottling; Vasodilator.

Conflict of interest statement

ML reports consulting fees from Novartis, lecture fees from Baxter and Fresenius, and research support from Shingotec.

HAO declares no conflict of interest

DDB is a consultant to and material for studies by Edwards Lifesciences.

ML declares COIs with Amomed (consulting, lecture), Aguettant (consulting), MSD (consulting, lecture), Pfizer (lecture), Aspen (lecture), Orion (lecture), and Octapharma (lecture).

BL is a member of an advisory board working for Orion Pharma and has received honoraria from the company for his participation in the board and for giving invited lectures at industry symposia.

PR is a co-founder of CardioRenal and declares personal fees (consulting) from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Relypsa, AstraZeneca, Grünenthal, Idorsia, Stealth Peptides, Fresenius, Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma, Vifor, and Clinical Trials Mobile Application, and lecture fees from Bayer and CVRx.

EV declares no conflict of interest.

FD received lecture fees from Sedana medical, a research grant from the French ministry of health.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. SOFA score, sequential organ failure assessment score; AE, adverse events; SAE, serious adverse events
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow chart of the study

References

    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
    1. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:925–928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0.
    1. Legrand M, Ait-Oufella H, Ince C. Could resuscitation be based on microcirculation data? Yes. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:944–946. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5121-0.
    1. Legrand M, De Backer D, Dépret F, Ait-Oufella H. Recruiting the microcirculation in septic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9 Available from: . Cited 2019 Dec 5.
    1. Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Ince C, Bakker J. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:934–938. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819869db.
    1. Donati A, Damiani E, Domizi R, Scorcella C, Carsetti A, Tondi S, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy for assessing tissue oxygenation and microvascular reactivity in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2016;20:311. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1500-5.
    1. Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, Galbois A, Baudel JL, Lemant J, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:801–807. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2163-y.
    1. De Backer D, Donadello K. Assessment of microperfusion in sepsis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:533–540.
    1. De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Favory R, Creteur J, Vincent J-L. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1813–1825. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2005-3.
    1. De Backer D. Is there a place for prostacyclin in the treatment of septic shock? Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1110–1112. doi: 10.1007/s001340100988.
    1. Rasmussen I, Arvidsson D, Zak A, Haglund U. Splanchnic and total body oxygen consumption in experimental fecal peritonitis in pigs: effects of dextran and iloprost. Circ Shock. 1992;36:299–306.
    1. Manasia A, Kang H, Hannon E, Lu Y, Oropello J, Leibowitz A, et al. Effects of the stable prostacyclin analogue iloprost on mesenteric blood flow in porcine endotoxic shock. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1222–1227. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199707000-00026.
    1. Dépret F, Sitbon A, Soussi S, De Tymowski C, Blet A, Fratani A, et al. Intravenous iloprost to recruit the microcirculation in septic shock patients? Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:121–122. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4935-5.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa