Digital pathology with artificial intelligence analyses provides greater insights into treatment-induced fibrosis regression in NASH

Nikolai V Naoumov, Dominique Brees, Juergen Loeffler, Elaine Chng, Yayun Ren, Patricia Lopez, Dean Tai, Sophie Lamle, Arun J Sanyal, Nikolai V Naoumov, Dominique Brees, Juergen Loeffler, Elaine Chng, Yayun Ren, Patricia Lopez, Dean Tai, Sophie Lamle, Arun J Sanyal

Abstract

Background & aims: Liver fibrosis is a key prognostic determinant for clinical outcomes in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Current scoring systems have limitations, especially in assessing fibrosis regression. Second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPEF) microscopy with artificial intelligence analyses provides standardized evaluation of NASH features, especially liver fibrosis and collagen fiber quantitation on a continuous scale. This approach was applied to gain in-depth understanding of fibrosis dynamics after treatment with tropifexor (TXR), a non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist in patients participating in the FLIGHT-FXR study (NCT02855164).

Method: Unstained sections from 198 liver biopsies (paired: baseline and end-of-treatment) from 99 patients with NASH (fibrosis stage F2 or F3) who received placebo (n = 34), TXR 140 μg (n = 37), or TXR 200 μg (n = 28) for 48 weeks were examined. Liver fibrosis (qFibrosis®), hepatic fat (qSteatosis®), and ballooned hepatocytes (qBallooning®) were quantitated using SHG/TPEF microscopy. Changes in septa morphology, collagen fiber parameters, and zonal distribution within liver lobules were also quantitatively assessed.

Results: Digital analyses revealed treatment-associated reductions in overall liver fibrosis (qFibrosis®), unlike conventional microscopy, as well as marked regression in perisinusoidal fibrosis in patients who had either F2 or F3 fibrosis at baseline. Concomitant zonal quantitation of fibrosis and steatosis revealed that patients with greater qSteatosis reduction also have the greatest reduction in perisinusoidal fibrosis. Regressive changes in septa morphology and reduction in septa parameters were observed almost exclusively in F3 patients, who were adjudged as 'unchanged' with conventional scoring.

Conclusion: Fibrosis regression following hepatic fat reduction occurs initially in the perisinusoidal regions, around areas of steatosis reduction. Digital pathology provides new insights into treatment-induced fibrosis regression in NASH, which are not captured by current staging systems.

Lay summary: The degree of liver fibrosis (tissue scarring) in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the main predictor of negative clinical outcomes. Accurate assessment of the quantity and architecture of liver fibrosis is fundamental for patient enrolment in NASH clinical trials and for determining treatment efficacy. Using digital microscopy with artificial intelligence analyses, the present study demonstrates that this novel approach has greater sensitivity in demonstrating treatment-induced reversal of fibrosis in the liver than current systems. Furthermore, additional details are obtained regarding the pathogenesis of NASH disease and the effects of therapy.

Keywords: Digital Pathology with Artificial Intelligence; Farnesoid X Receptor Agonists and NASH Treatment; Fibrosis Regression; Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis; Perisinusoidal Fibrosis; Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest N.V. Naoumov: Previously employee, Novartis; current: Advisor, HistoIndex, Hepion, InSphero; D. Brees, J. Loeffler, P. Lopez: Employee, Novartis. E. Chng, Y. Ren, D. Tai: Employee, Histoindex. S. Lamle: Previously employee, Novartis; current: Employee, Philip Morris International. A. J. Sanyal: Stockholder: Sanyal Bio, Durect, Genfit, Tiziana, Inversago, Exhalenz; Collaborations: Novartis, Gilead, Intercept, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Hanmi; Advisory Board: NGM Bio, Sequana; Consultant: Intercept, 89Bio, Merck, Pfizer, Genenetech, Gilead, Amgen, Regeneron, Alnylam, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Siemens, Surrozen, Tern, Poxel, NorthSea, Lipocine, Histoindex, Path AI, Novartis, Astra Zeneca. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa