Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol

Maud Robert, Tigran Poghosyan, Dominique Delaunay, Elise Pelascini, Sylvain Iceta, Adrien Sterkers, Charles Barsamian, Litavan Khamphommala, Sylvie Bin Dorel, Delphine Maucort-Boulch, Sebastien Czernichow, Emmanuel Disse, Maud Robert, Tigran Poghosyan, Dominique Delaunay, Elise Pelascini, Sylvain Iceta, Adrien Sterkers, Charles Barsamian, Litavan Khamphommala, Sylvie Bin Dorel, Delphine Maucort-Boulch, Sebastien Czernichow, Emmanuel Disse

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the non-negligible weight loss failure rate at midterm, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains the reference procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity with metabolic comorbidities. A recently emerged procedure, the single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), could be more effective on weight loss with similar morbidity and lower weight loss failure rate than RYGB. We propose the first randomised, open, multicentre superiority trial comparing the SADI-S to RYGB (SADISLEEVE).

Methods and analysis: The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority at 2 years after surgery of the SADI-S compared with RYGB in term of excess weight loss percentage. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of nutritional status, metabolic outcomes, overall complication rates and quality of life, within 2 years after surgery. Key inclusion criteria are obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with at least one comorbid condition and candidate to a first bariatric procedure or after failure of sleeve gastrectomy. Patients randomised by minimisation in two arms, based on centre, surgery as a revisional procedure, presence of type 2 diabetes and BMI >50 kg/m2 will be included over 2 years.A sample size of 166 patients in each group will have a power of 90% to detect a probability of 0.603 that excess weight loss in the RYGB arm is less than excess weight loss in the SADI-S arm with a 5% two-sided significance level. With a drop-out rate of 10%, it will be necessary to include 183 patients per group.

Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan (CPP1089-HPS1). Study was also approved by the French national agency for drug safety (2018061500148). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Trial registration number: NCT03610256.

Keywords: clinical trials; nutrition & dietetics; surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DM-B reports personal fees from Maat Pharma outside of the submitted work. MR reports fees as a consultant from Medtronic and fees as an expert speaker from Gore outside of the submitted work.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Participant timeline diagram. BMI, body mass index; %EBWL, excess body weight loss percentage; %EWL, excess weight loss percentage; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoproteins; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; GIQLI, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SADI-S, single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy; SF, short form; SG, sleeve gastrectomy; TG, triglycerides.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Theorical and real inclusions curves. The blue curve shows the rate of expected hypothetical inclusions needed to complete recruitment on time (n=366). The red curve shows the real number of inclusions between October 2018 and January 2020 (n=178).

References

    1. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. . Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2009;122:248–56. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041
    1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. . Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292:1724–37. 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724
    1. Sjöström L, Lindroos A-K, Peltonen M, et al. . Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2683–93. 10.1056/NEJMoa035622
    1. Thereaux J, Lesuffleur T, Czernichow S, et al. . Long-term adverse events after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass: a 7-year nationwide, observational, population-based, cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7:786–95. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30191-3
    1. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 1994;4:353–7. 10.1381/096089294765558331
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. . Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2002–13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401329
    1. Eliasson B, Liakopoulos V, Franzén S, et al. . Cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery in Sweden: a nationwide, matched, observational cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:847–54. 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00334-4
    1. Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. . Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019;393:1299–309. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1
    1. Himpens J, Coromina L, Verbrugghe A, et al. . Outcomes of revisional procedures for insufficient weight loss or weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2012;22:1746–54. 10.1007/s11695-012-0728-7
    1. Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. . Revision of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg 2016;26:1627–34. 10.1007/s11695-016-2201-5
    1. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould F-S, et al. . Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg 2007;17:1421–30. 10.1007/s11695-008-9435-9
    1. Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2006;244:611–9. 10.1097/01.sla.0000239086.30518.2a
    1. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. . Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg 2007;17:1614–8. 10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8
    1. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MAR, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. . Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). one to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg 2010;20:1720–6. 10.1007/s11695-010-0247-3
    1. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Miguel Ángel, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. . Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013;9:731–5. 10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.018
    1. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Miguel Ángel, Cabrerizo L, et al. . Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015;11:1092–8. 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024
    1. Martini F, Paolino L, Marzano E, et al. . Single-Anastomosis pylorus-preserving bariatric procedures: review of the literature. Obes Surg 2016;26:2503–15. 10.1007/s11695-016-2310-1
    1. Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017;13:1306–12. 10.1016/j.soard.2017.04.027
    1. Lebel S, Dion G, Marceau S, et al. . Clinical outcomes of duodenal switch with a 200-cm common channel: a matched, controlled trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1014–20. 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.014
    1. Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. . Mid-Term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2017;27:1302–8. 10.1007/s11695-016-2471-y
    1. Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch is superior to gastric bypass in patients with super obesity when evaluated with the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg 2017;27:2308–16. 10.1007/s11695-017-2680-z
    1. Poghosyan T, Lazzati A, Moszkowicz D, et al. . Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an audit of 34 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1646–51. 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.039
    1. Kim J, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee . American Society for metabolic and bariatric surgery statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:944–5. 10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.006
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13. 10.1097/
    1. Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:385–94.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975;31:103–15. 10.2307/2529712
    1. Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, et al. . The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. A review. Control Clin Trials 2002;23:662–74. 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med 1997;336:309–16. 10.1056/NEJM199701233360422
    1. Enochs P, Bull J, Surve A, et al. . Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single us center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020;16:24–33. 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008
    1. Cottam S, Ng P, Sharp L, et al. . Single-anastomosis duodenal ileostomy with sleeve is a safe and effective option for patients in an ambulatory surgical center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019;15:1990–3. 10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.062
    1. Poghosyan T, Alameh A, Bruzzi M, et al. . Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass for weight loss failure. Obes Surg 2019;29:2436–41. 10.1007/s11695-019-03864-x

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa