Kliiniset tutkimukset Nct sivu

Summary
EudraCT Number:2005-000374-48
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:104325
National Competent Authority:Denmark - DHMA
Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
Trial Status:Completed
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2005-04-18
Trial results View results
A. Protocol Information
A.1Member State ConcernedDenmark - DHMA
A.2EudraCT number2005-000374-48
A.3Full title of the trial
A randomized, open label comparative study to determine the proportion of asthma patients on Seretide Diskus 50/250 mcg b.i.d. achieving total control when given medication and compli-ance enhancement training compared to those receiving medica-tion only.
A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number104325
A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1Name of SponsorGlaxoSmithKline Pharma A/S
B.1.3.4CountryDenmark
B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
B.4.2Country
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1Name of organisation
B.5.2Functional name of contact point
D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Information not present in EudraCT
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.1Product nameSeretide
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Inhalation powder
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPInhalation use
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.8 Information on Placebo
E. General Information on the Trial
E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
Asthma
MedDRA Classification
E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
E.2 Objective of the trial
E.2.1Main objective of the trial
To determine the proportion of asthma subjects achieving Total control of their asthma in 7 weeks out of the last 8 consecutive weeks of treatment period 2 when given Seretide Diskus 50/250 mcg b.i.d with compliance enhancement training compared to those given medication alone.
E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
•To determine the proportion of subjects who achieved Total control after treat-ment period 1.
•To determine the time (weeks) to first ’total control week’ within treatment period 2 dependent on absence or presence of compliance enhancement.
•To determine whether there is a difference in the level of quality of life after treatment period 2 dependent on absence or presence of compliance enhancement.
•To determine whether there is a difference in the level of compliance with medi-cation dependent on absence or presence of compliance enhancement.
•To determine improvement in lung function and symptoms.
•To compare asthma severity pre-baseline of the subjects achieving Total control at the end of the study in each treatment group.
E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study Information not present in EudraCT
E.3Principal inclusion criteria
1) Male or female subjects 18 years of age or above
2) Diagnosed with persistent asthma
3) Treated as an outpatient
4) Treated with up to or equal to 250 mcg fluticasone or up to or equal to 320 mcg budesonide (ex actuator, corresponding to 400 mcg budesonide labelled) b.i.d pre-study (or equivalent for other inhaled corticosteroids) or treated with less than or equal to 50 mcg salmeterol b.i.d pre-study or less than or equal to 9 mcg formoterol (ex actuator, corresponding to 12 mcg labelled formoterol) b.i.d pre-study and/or treated with short acting bronchodilator
5) Non- or ex-smoker (ex-smoker defined as not having smoked during the last year)6) Subjects must give full written, dated, and signed informed consent
7) Female subjects must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or using effective contraception (Pearl index > 99).
8) Subject able to comply with the use of the AM2 and the AQLQ in the local language

Inclusion criterion for entry into treatment period 2
9) During treatment period 1, subjects must have failed to achieve the criteria for Total control
E.4Principal exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria valid for the entire study period
1) Known or suspected Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
2) Pregnant or lactating
3) Participating investigator, employee of an investigator, or family member of any of the aforementioned
4) Smoking history: Pack-years: 10 years or above
5) Have known clinical or laboratory evidence of a serious uncontrolled systemic disease
6) Known hypersensitivity to any substance contained in investigational product or p.r.n medication
7) Participation in a clinical trial with study drug

Exclusion criteria for specifically entry into run-in period
8) Treatment with oral corticosteroid within 2 months prior to screening visit
9) Upper or lower respiratory tract infection (microbiologically verified) within 1 month prior to screening visit
10) Acute asthma exacerbation requiring hospitalisation or emergency room treatment within 3 months prior to the screening visit
11) Participation in a clinical trial with study drug within 1 month prior to screening visit

Exclusion criteria specifically for entry into treatment period 1
12) Changes in asthma medication during the run-in period
13) Treatment with systemic corticosteroids during the run-in period
14) Respiratory tract infection (microbiologically verified) during the run-in period
15) More than one week of Total control prior to baseline visit

Exclusion criteria specifically for entry into treatment period 2
16) Changes in asthma medication during the treatment period 1 as listed in protocol section 8.2.
17) Respiratory infection (microbiologically verified) during treatment period 1
18) Total control achieved during treatment period 1
E.5 End points
E.5.1Primary end point(s)
The proportion (%) of subjects who achieve ‘Total control’ in 7 out of the last 8 consecutive weeks in treatment period 2 with Seretide Diskus 50/250 mcg fixed dosing and compliance enhancement compared with Seretide Diskus 50/250 mcg fixed dosing without compliance enhancement.
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
E.6Scope of the trial
E.6.1Diagnosis Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.2Prophylaxis Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.3Therapy Yes
E.6.4Safety Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.5Efficacy Yes
E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.7Pharmacodynamic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.8Bioequivalence Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.9Dose response Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.10Pharmacogenetic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.11Pharmacogenomic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.13Others Yes
E.6.13.1Other scope of the trial description
Quality of life
E.7Trial type and phase
E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.1First administration to humans Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.3Other Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
E.8 Design of the trial
E.8.1Controlled No
E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
E.8.1.2Open Yes
E.8.1.3Single blind No
E.8.1.4Double blind No
E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
E.8.1.6Cross over No
E.8.1.7Other Yes
E.8.1.7.1Other trial design description
Comparative
E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
E.8.2.2Placebo No
E.8.2.3Other Yes
E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
Compliance enhancement training (asthma education)
E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months9
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years1
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months9
F. Population of Trial Subjects
F.1 Age Range
F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
F.1.1.1In Utero Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
F.2 Gender
F.2.1Female Yes
F.2.2Male Yes
F.3 Group of trial subjects
F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
F.3.2Patients Yes
F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception For clinical trials recorded in the database before the 10th March 2011 this question read: "Women of childbearing potential" and did not include the words "not using contraception". An answer of yes could have included women of child bearing potential whether or not they would be using contraception. The answer should therefore be understood in that context. This trial was recorded in the database on 2005-04-18. Yes
F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
F.3.3.4Nursing women No
F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
F.3.3.6.1Details of subjects incapable of giving consent
Women of childbearing potential must be using effective contraception (Pearl index > 99) or be surgically sterile.
F.3.3.7Others No
F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
F.4.1In the member state275
F.4.2 For a multinational trial
F.4.2.1In the EEA 275
F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 550
G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2005-05-10
N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2005-05-25
P. End of Trial
P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
P.Date of the global end of the trial2007-05-29
3
Tilaa