Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations

5 février 2015 mis à jour par: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib (Tarceva®) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as the First-line Treatment for Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients With Mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) in Their Tumors

This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours. Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 iv on Day 1.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

217

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
      • Beijing, Chine, 101149
      • Beijing, Chine, 100071
      • Changchun, Chine, 130012
      • ChongQing, Chine, 400042
      • Chongqing, Chine, 400038
      • Fuzhou, Chine, 350014
      • Guangzhou, Chine, 510080
      • Hangzhou, Chine, 310016
      • Nanjing, Chine, 210002
      • Shanghai, Chine, 200032
      • Shanghai, Chine, 200433
      • Shanghai, Chine, 200030
      • Shantou, Chine, 515041
      • Wuhan, Chine, 430023
      • Xi'an, Chine, 710061
  • Malaisie
      • Kelantan, Malaisie, 16150
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaisie, 59100
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaisie, 50603
      • Nilai, Malaisie, 71800
      • Pahang, Malaisie, 25100
      • Petaling Jaya, Malaisie, 46150
      • Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaisie, 46050
      • Pulau Pinang, Malaisie, 11600
  • Philippines
      • Davao, Philippines, 8000
      • Desmarinas City, Philippines, 4114
      • Manila, Philippines, 1000
      • Quezon City, Philippines, 1104
      • San Juan, Philippines, 1500

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult participants, ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Locally advanced or recurrent (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in tumours.
  • Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria.
  • European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior exposure to agents directed at the human epidermal receptor (HER) axis (eg, but not limited to erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, or trastuzumab).
  • Prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease.
  • Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome, or inability to take oral medication, or active gastroduodenal ulcer disease.
  • Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye.
  • ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy.
  • History of any other malignancies within 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.
  • Brain metastasis or spinal cord compression that has not yet been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated but without evidence of stable disease for at least 2 months.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Pregnant, nursing, or lactating women.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
Médicament: Erlotinib
Erlotinib was supplied as tablets.
Autres noms:
  • Tarceva
Comparateur actif: Chemotherapy
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
Médicament: Chemotherapy
Cisplatin and gemcitabine were locally sourced with commercial products.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Investigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival
Délai: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)
The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease. (3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
A responder was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. A CR was defined as: (1) The disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to < 10 mm. (2) The disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (< 10 mm in the short axis). A PR was defined as: (1) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (2) The persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits.
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Délai: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
A participant with disease control was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), as determined using RECIST v1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. A SLD for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline SLD.
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Duration of Response
Délai: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first documented disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs taking as reference the Baseline SLD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Overall Survival
Délai: Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)
Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events
Délai: 36 months
36 months
Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Lung (FACIT-L) Questionnaire
Délai: approximately 21 months
approximately 21 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Hoffmann-La Roche

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mars 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juillet 2012

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 avril 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 avril 2011

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 avril 2011

Première publication (Estimation)

27 avril 2011

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

24 février 2015

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 février 2015

Dernière vérification

1 février 2015

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • YO25121

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner