- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT01342965
A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations
5. februar 2015 oppdatert av: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib (Tarceva®) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as the First-line Treatment for Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients With Mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) in Their Tumors
This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours.
Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 iv on Day 1.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
217
Fase
- Fase 3
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Davao, Filippinene, 8000
-
Desmarinas City, Filippinene, 4114
-
Manila, Filippinene, 1000
-
Quezon City, Filippinene, 1104
-
San Juan, Filippinene, 1500
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, Kina, 101149
-
Beijing, Kina, 100071
-
Changchun, Kina, 130012
-
ChongQing, Kina, 400042
-
Chongqing, Kina, 400038
-
Fuzhou, Kina, 350014
-
Guangzhou, Kina, 510080
-
Hangzhou, Kina, 310016
-
Nanjing, Kina, 210002
-
Shanghai, Kina, 200032
-
Shanghai, Kina, 200433
-
Shanghai, Kina, 200030
-
Shantou, Kina, 515041
-
Wuhan, Kina, 430023
-
Xi'an, Kina, 710061
-
-
-
-
-
Kelantan, Malaysia, 16150
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 50603
-
Nilai, Malaysia, 71800
-
Pahang, Malaysia, 25100
-
Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 46150
-
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia, 46050
-
Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, 11600
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult participants, ≥ 18 years of age.
- Locally advanced or recurrent (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer.
- Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in tumours.
- Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria.
- European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior exposure to agents directed at the human epidermal receptor (HER) axis (eg, but not limited to erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, or trastuzumab).
- Prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease.
- Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome, or inability to take oral medication, or active gastroduodenal ulcer disease.
- Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye.
- ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy.
- History of any other malignancies within 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.
- Brain metastasis or spinal cord compression that has not yet been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated but without evidence of stable disease for at least 2 months.
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- Pregnant, nursing, or lactating women.
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Erlotinib was supplied as tablets.
Andre navn:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Chemotherapy
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
Cisplatin and gemcitabine were locally sourced with commercial products.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival
Tidsramme: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)
|
The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum).
The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
(2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy.
When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease.
(3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.
|
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator
Tidsramme: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
|
A responder was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
A CR was defined as: (1) The disappearance of all target lesions.
Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to < 10 mm.
(2) The disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels.
All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (< 10 mm in the short axis).
A PR was defined as: (1) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
(2) The persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits.
|
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Tidsramme: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
|
A participant with disease control was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), as determined using RECIST v1.1.
A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL).
A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter (SLD).
SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started.
For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions.
PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
A SLD for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline SLD.
|
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
|
|
Duration of Response
Tidsramme: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
|
Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first documented disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurs first.
A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL).
A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs taking as reference the Baseline SLD.
PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
|
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
|
|
Overall Survival
Tidsramme: Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)
|
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
|
Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)
|
|
Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events
Tidsramme: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
|
Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Lung (FACIT-L) Questionnaire
Tidsramme: approximately 21 months
|
approximately 21 months
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Generelle publikasjoner
- Wen F, Zheng H, Zhang P, Hutton D, Li Q. OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e020128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128.
- Wu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK, Wu G, Liu X, Zhong Z, Lu S, Cheng Y, Han B, Chen L, Huang C, Qin S, Zhu Y, Pan H, Liang H, Li E, Jiang G, How SH, Fernando MCL, Zhang Y, Xia F, Zuo Y. First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1883-1889. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv270. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
1. mars 2011
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
1. juli 2012
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
1. april 2014
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
26. april 2011
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
26. april 2011
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
27. april 2011
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)
24. februar 2015
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
5. februar 2015
Sist bekreftet
1. februar 2015
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
- Sykdommer i luftveiene
- Neoplasmer
- Lungesykdommer
- Neoplasmer etter nettsted
- Neoplasmer i luftveiene
- Thoracale neoplasmer
- Karsinom, bronkogent
- Bronkiale neoplasmer
- Lungeneoplasmer
- Karsinom, ikke-småcellet lunge
- Molekylære mekanismer for farmakologisk virkning
- Enzymhemmere
- Antineoplastiske midler
- Proteinkinasehemmere
- Erlotinib hydroklorid
Andre studie-ID-numre
- YO25121
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .