- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT02152436
Simulation-based Curriculum to Enhance Culture of Safety in Operating Rooms (PROPECS)
Communication in the operating room (OR) is a key factor to prevent deleterious events for the patient. French national health authority made the implementation of safety checklist mandatory in operating rooms. The goal of this checklist is to improve teamwork and share key elements for better patient outcomes. Observational studies in the OR showed low compliance to this checklist, either on the way it is used or on the information implemented.
The primary objective of this project is to assess the efficacy of a simulation-based curriculum involving OR medical and non-medical personnel in order to improve communication in the OR.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Operating theater is a complex system where efficient communication is critical to patient safety. Patient safety check-list are used worldwide as a way to improve communication and teamwork in the operating room in order to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown that communication failure in the OR may be associated with adverse events. The improvement of safety culture (including communication and team work) may be obtained by simulation based training.
The primary objective of this before-after study is to assess the efficacy of a simulation-based curriculum involving OR medical and non medical personnel in order to improve communication in the OR.
In brief, in a first period, an audit to assess communication efficacy and teamwork will be realized during 125 surgical procedures. Communication failures and consequences will be recorded using a standardized form filled by trained personnel. In a second phase, all the OR personnel (surgeon, anesthesiologist, nurses) will be invited to participate to a special training on communication and teamwork. This curriculum will include formal presentations and also simulation-based training. Scenarios are built to improve the ability to communicate in specific situations (fire in the OR, haemorrhage, wrong side, anaphylaxis).
In a third phase, an audit on communication and teamwork, similar to the first phase will be realized. The primary endpoint is the frequency of surgical interventions having at least one communication failure with a consequence. The investigators expect a significant decrease in the rate of communication failures between phase 1 and 3. A fourth phase will consist in a last audit two years after phase 1 to evaluate long-term effect of this curriculum.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Grenoble, France, 38000
- Operating rooms of Grenoble University Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All surgical interventions occuring in Grenoble University Hospital, North site, between November and January
Exclusion Criteria:
- Interventions supposed to last more than 4 hours
- Interventions in situations of vital emergencies
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Before simulation-based curriculum
125 surgical interventions will be observed and outcomes will be measured before simulation-based curriculum
|
|
|
After simulation-based curriculum
125 surgical interventions will be observed and outcomes will be measured after simulation-based curriculum
|
Operating room medical and non-medical members will be asked to carry out a simulation session preceded by an educational maze with videos.
Outcomes will be compared and correlated after and before this curriculum
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Frequency of surgical interventions having at least on communication failure with a consequence
Délai: After 3 months of audit
|
After 3 months of audit
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Compliance to the safety checklist in the operating room
Délai: measured during each surgical intervention, before anesthesia, before incision and at the end of surgery
|
measured during each surgical intervention, before anesthesia, before incision and at the end of surgery
|
|
6 items survey estimating teamwork quality
Délai: measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
|
measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
|
|
Number of adverse events occuring in the OR declared to the institution
Délai: After 3 months of audit
|
After 3 months of audit
|
|
Surgical Apgar score
Délai: measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
|
measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
|
|
Nature of communication failure and consequences
Délai: measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
|
measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
|
|
rate of communication failures
Délai: measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
|
measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
|
|
Survey on safety culture for employees working in the OR
Délai: After 3 months of audit
|
After 3 months of audit
|
|
Count of team members and number of passage in the OR
Délai: measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
|
measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Pierre Albaladejo, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2013-32 (Autre identifiant: AP HM)
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .