Simulation-based Curriculum to Enhance Culture of Safety in Operating Rooms (PROPECS)

October 31, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Communication in the operating room (OR) is a key factor to prevent deleterious events for the patient. French national health authority made the implementation of safety checklist mandatory in operating rooms. The goal of this checklist is to improve teamwork and share key elements for better patient outcomes. Observational studies in the OR showed low compliance to this checklist, either on the way it is used or on the information implemented.

The primary objective of this project is to assess the efficacy of a simulation-based curriculum involving OR medical and non-medical personnel in order to improve communication in the OR.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Operating theater is a complex system where efficient communication is critical to patient safety. Patient safety check-list are used worldwide as a way to improve communication and teamwork in the operating room in order to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown that communication failure in the OR may be associated with adverse events. The improvement of safety culture (including communication and team work) may be obtained by simulation based training.

The primary objective of this before-after study is to assess the efficacy of a simulation-based curriculum involving OR medical and non medical personnel in order to improve communication in the OR.

In brief, in a first period, an audit to assess communication efficacy and teamwork will be realized during 125 surgical procedures. Communication failures and consequences will be recorded using a standardized form filled by trained personnel. In a second phase, all the OR personnel (surgeon, anesthesiologist, nurses) will be invited to participate to a special training on communication and teamwork. This curriculum will include formal presentations and also simulation-based training. Scenarios are built to improve the ability to communicate in specific situations (fire in the OR, haemorrhage, wrong side, anaphylaxis).

In a third phase, an audit on communication and teamwork, similar to the first phase will be realized. The primary endpoint is the frequency of surgical interventions having at least one communication failure with a consequence. The investigators expect a significant decrease in the rate of communication failures between phase 1 and 3. A fourth phase will consist in a last audit two years after phase 1 to evaluate long-term effect of this curriculum.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

259

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Operating rooms of Grenoble University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Surgical interventions in Grenoble University Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All surgical interventions occuring in Grenoble University Hospital, North site, between November and January

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Interventions supposed to last more than 4 hours
  • Interventions in situations of vital emergencies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Before simulation-based curriculum
125 surgical interventions will be observed and outcomes will be measured before simulation-based curriculum
After simulation-based curriculum
125 surgical interventions will be observed and outcomes will be measured after simulation-based curriculum
Operating room medical and non-medical members will be asked to carry out a simulation session preceded by an educational maze with videos. Outcomes will be compared and correlated after and before this curriculum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Frequency of surgical interventions having at least on communication failure with a consequence
Time Frame: After 3 months of audit
After 3 months of audit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compliance to the safety checklist in the operating room
Time Frame: measured during each surgical intervention, before anesthesia, before incision and at the end of surgery
measured during each surgical intervention, before anesthesia, before incision and at the end of surgery
6 items survey estimating teamwork quality
Time Frame: measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
Number of adverse events occuring in the OR declared to the institution
Time Frame: After 3 months of audit
After 3 months of audit
Surgical Apgar score
Time Frame: measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
measured at the end of each surgical intervention, an average of 2.5 hours
Nature of communication failure and consequences
Time Frame: measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
rate of communication failures
Time Frame: measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
Survey on safety culture for employees working in the OR
Time Frame: After 3 months of audit
After 3 months of audit
Count of team members and number of passage in the OR
Time Frame: measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours
measured during each surgical procedure, for an average of 2.5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Albaladejo, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2013-32 (Other Identifier: AP HM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Simulation - based curriculum

Subscribe