Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique (RCRPRFM)
11 juillet 2017 mis à jour par: HealthPartners Institute
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique: A Randomized Blinded Outcomes Study
This study is a single-blind, randomized study evaluating the 6 month and 2 year outcomes of patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using one of two techniques.
One technique used is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation and the other technique is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation with the use of plateley rich fibrin membrane (PRFM).
It is hypothesized that patients undergoing the surgery with the PRFM will report a higher quality of life than the patients that do not receive this treatment.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
97
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Minnesota
-
Bloomington, Minnesota, États-Unis, 55431
- TRIA Orthopaedic Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of a rotator cuff tear as determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging (MRI)
- Patient undergoes arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
- Age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria:
Pre-operative exclusion criteria
- Patient has had a previous arthroscopic rotator cut repair
- A previous diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, chronic dislocation, inflammatory or degenerative glenohumeral arthropathy, frozen shoulder, or previous surgery of the affected shoulder,
- Evidence of significant rotator cuff arthropathy with superior humeral translation and acromial erosion diagnosed by x-ray or other investigations,
- Medical device that would exclude the patient from having a MRI, including a pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, aneurysm clips, carotid artery clamp, neurostimulator, insulin or infusion pump, implanted drug infusion device, bone growth/fusion stimulator, or ear implant.
- Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 2 years or unacceptably high operative risk),
- Inability to speak or read English
- Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent.
- Pregnant patients.
- Age 17 or younger
- Unwillingness to be followed for 2 years.
- Bilateral Rotator cuff tear confirmed by clinical exam and MRI
- Patients enrolled in the study who demonstrate retear on clinical exam and MRI, then elect for a repeat surgery.
Intra-operative exclusion criteria (Note: This information will be collected during the chart audit and patients will be excluded from the study at that time.)
- Irreparable cuff tears or tears extending into the subscapularis or teres minor
- Isolated teres minor or subscapularis tears.
- Inelastic and immobile tendon which cannot be advanced to articular margin
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Double Row
|
|
|
Expérimental: Double Row with PRFM
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Return to Function
Délai: Baseline
|
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score.
There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module.
More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
|
Baseline
|
|
Return to Function
Délai: 6 months
|
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score.
There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module.
More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
|
6 months
|
|
Return to Function
Délai: 24 months
|
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
|
24 months
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Spraspinatus Strength Measurements
Délai: Baseline
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
Baseline
|
|
MRI
Délai: 6 months
|
MRI was used to determine size of the defect in the proximal to distal, humeral to bursal, superior to inferior direction in all four tendons. All post operative rotator cuffs were described using the MRI rating system of Sugaya. This classification distinguishes 5 outcomes of rotator cuff repair based on integrity of the tendon determine by post operative MRI. Type I demonstrates the repaired rotator cuff has sufficient thickness and homogeneously low intensity on each image; Type II sufficient thickness with a partial high intensity area; Type III insufficient thickness without discontinuity, Type IV the presence of a minor discontinuity in more than one slice of each image suggestive of small tear; Type V the presence of a major discontinuity on each image suggestive of a large tear. Higher grades are worse radiographic outcomes. |
6 months
|
|
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
Délai: 6 months
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
6 months
|
|
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
Délai: 24 months
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
24 months
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Délai: Baseline
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
Baseline
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Délai: 6 months
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
6 months
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Délai: 24 months
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
24 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 juillet 2011
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 décembre 2015
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 décembre 2015
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
4 août 2014
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
3 octobre 2014
Première publication (Estimation)
6 octobre 2014
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
9 août 2017
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
11 juillet 2017
Dernière vérification
1 octobre 2015
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 04100-11-C
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .