Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique (RCRPRFM)
11 de julio de 2017 actualizado por: HealthPartners Institute
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique: A Randomized Blinded Outcomes Study
This study is a single-blind, randomized study evaluating the 6 month and 2 year outcomes of patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using one of two techniques.
One technique used is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation and the other technique is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation with the use of plateley rich fibrin membrane (PRFM).
It is hypothesized that patients undergoing the surgery with the PRFM will report a higher quality of life than the patients that do not receive this treatment.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
97
Fase
- Fase 4
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Minnesota
-
Bloomington, Minnesota, Estados Unidos, 55431
- TRIA Orthopaedic Center
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of a rotator cuff tear as determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging (MRI)
- Patient undergoes arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
- Age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria:
Pre-operative exclusion criteria
- Patient has had a previous arthroscopic rotator cut repair
- A previous diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, chronic dislocation, inflammatory or degenerative glenohumeral arthropathy, frozen shoulder, or previous surgery of the affected shoulder,
- Evidence of significant rotator cuff arthropathy with superior humeral translation and acromial erosion diagnosed by x-ray or other investigations,
- Medical device that would exclude the patient from having a MRI, including a pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, aneurysm clips, carotid artery clamp, neurostimulator, insulin or infusion pump, implanted drug infusion device, bone growth/fusion stimulator, or ear implant.
- Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 2 years or unacceptably high operative risk),
- Inability to speak or read English
- Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent.
- Pregnant patients.
- Age 17 or younger
- Unwillingness to be followed for 2 years.
- Bilateral Rotator cuff tear confirmed by clinical exam and MRI
- Patients enrolled in the study who demonstrate retear on clinical exam and MRI, then elect for a repeat surgery.
Intra-operative exclusion criteria (Note: This information will be collected during the chart audit and patients will be excluded from the study at that time.)
- Irreparable cuff tears or tears extending into the subscapularis or teres minor
- Isolated teres minor or subscapularis tears.
- Inelastic and immobile tendon which cannot be advanced to articular margin
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Double Row
|
|
|
Experimental: Double Row with PRFM
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Return to Function
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score.
There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module.
More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
|
Baseline
|
|
Return to Function
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
|
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score.
There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module.
More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
|
6 months
|
|
Return to Function
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
|
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
|
24 months
|
Otras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Spraspinatus Strength Measurements
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
Baseline
|
|
MRI
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
|
MRI was used to determine size of the defect in the proximal to distal, humeral to bursal, superior to inferior direction in all four tendons. All post operative rotator cuffs were described using the MRI rating system of Sugaya. This classification distinguishes 5 outcomes of rotator cuff repair based on integrity of the tendon determine by post operative MRI. Type I demonstrates the repaired rotator cuff has sufficient thickness and homogeneously low intensity on each image; Type II sufficient thickness with a partial high intensity area; Type III insufficient thickness without discontinuity, Type IV the presence of a minor discontinuity in more than one slice of each image suggestive of small tear; Type V the presence of a major discontinuity on each image suggestive of a large tear. Higher grades are worse radiographic outcomes. |
6 months
|
|
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
6 months
|
|
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
24 months
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
Baseline
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
6 months
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
24 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
1 de julio de 2011
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de diciembre de 2015
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
1 de diciembre de 2015
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
4 de agosto de 2014
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
3 de octubre de 2014
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
6 de octubre de 2014
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
9 de agosto de 2017
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
11 de julio de 2017
Última verificación
1 de octubre de 2015
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 04100-11-C
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .