Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique (RCRPRFM)
11 de julho de 2017 atualizado por: HealthPartners Institute
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique: A Randomized Blinded Outcomes Study
This study is a single-blind, randomized study evaluating the 6 month and 2 year outcomes of patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using one of two techniques.
One technique used is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation and the other technique is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation with the use of plateley rich fibrin membrane (PRFM).
It is hypothesized that patients undergoing the surgery with the PRFM will report a higher quality of life than the patients that do not receive this treatment.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
97
Estágio
- Fase 4
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Minnesota
-
Bloomington, Minnesota, Estados Unidos, 55431
- TRIA Orthopaedic Center
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of a rotator cuff tear as determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging (MRI)
- Patient undergoes arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
- Age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria:
Pre-operative exclusion criteria
- Patient has had a previous arthroscopic rotator cut repair
- A previous diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, chronic dislocation, inflammatory or degenerative glenohumeral arthropathy, frozen shoulder, or previous surgery of the affected shoulder,
- Evidence of significant rotator cuff arthropathy with superior humeral translation and acromial erosion diagnosed by x-ray or other investigations,
- Medical device that would exclude the patient from having a MRI, including a pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, aneurysm clips, carotid artery clamp, neurostimulator, insulin or infusion pump, implanted drug infusion device, bone growth/fusion stimulator, or ear implant.
- Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 2 years or unacceptably high operative risk),
- Inability to speak or read English
- Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent.
- Pregnant patients.
- Age 17 or younger
- Unwillingness to be followed for 2 years.
- Bilateral Rotator cuff tear confirmed by clinical exam and MRI
- Patients enrolled in the study who demonstrate retear on clinical exam and MRI, then elect for a repeat surgery.
Intra-operative exclusion criteria (Note: This information will be collected during the chart audit and patients will be excluded from the study at that time.)
- Irreparable cuff tears or tears extending into the subscapularis or teres minor
- Isolated teres minor or subscapularis tears.
- Inelastic and immobile tendon which cannot be advanced to articular margin
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Double Row
|
|
|
Experimental: Double Row with PRFM
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Return to Function
Prazo: Baseline
|
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score.
There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module.
More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
|
Baseline
|
|
Return to Function
Prazo: 6 months
|
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score.
There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module.
More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
|
6 months
|
|
Return to Function
Prazo: 24 months
|
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
|
24 months
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Spraspinatus Strength Measurements
Prazo: Baseline
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
Baseline
|
|
MRI
Prazo: 6 months
|
MRI was used to determine size of the defect in the proximal to distal, humeral to bursal, superior to inferior direction in all four tendons. All post operative rotator cuffs were described using the MRI rating system of Sugaya. This classification distinguishes 5 outcomes of rotator cuff repair based on integrity of the tendon determine by post operative MRI. Type I demonstrates the repaired rotator cuff has sufficient thickness and homogeneously low intensity on each image; Type II sufficient thickness with a partial high intensity area; Type III insufficient thickness without discontinuity, Type IV the presence of a minor discontinuity in more than one slice of each image suggestive of small tear; Type V the presence of a major discontinuity on each image suggestive of a large tear. Higher grades are worse radiographic outcomes. |
6 months
|
|
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
Prazo: 6 months
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
6 months
|
|
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
Prazo: 24 months
|
Strength of supraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
24 months
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Prazo: Baseline
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
Baseline
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Prazo: 6 months
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
6 months
|
|
Infraspinatus Strength Measurements
Prazo: 24 months
|
Strength of infraspinatus in newton meters with a hand held dynomometer.
Three trials were recorded and an average taken.
Data is reported as measured by % of uninvolved.
Average of strength measures for involved/average of strength measures for uninvolved x 100.
|
24 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
1 de julho de 2011
Conclusão Primária (Real)
1 de dezembro de 2015
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
1 de dezembro de 2015
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
4 de agosto de 2014
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
3 de outubro de 2014
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
6 de outubro de 2014
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
9 de agosto de 2017
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
11 de julho de 2017
Última verificação
1 de outubro de 2015
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 04100-11-C
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .