Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Computerized Cognitive Training for the Elderly

12 janvier 2018 mis à jour par: Rogerio Panizzutti, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of a neuroplasticity-based computerized cognitive training for the elderly

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Cognitive impairments are prominent features of aging and are mostly characterized by memory difficulties. Neuroplasticity based computerized cognitive trainings have been emerging for the last two decades and are an attempt to help the elderly population with their impairments.

The aim of this study is to perform a computerized cognitive training to improve attention, concentration, learning, and quality of life in elderly participants. The investigators are interested in testing the differential efficacy between a bottom-up to top-down versus a top-down to bottom-up computerized cognitive training.

The investigators will conduct a 40 hours computerized, adaptable, cognitive training program in participants 60 years of age and above. Participants will come for 1 hour, daily, and perform a bottom-up to top-down or top-down to bottom-up training, or control games for about 2 months. Bottom-up to top-down and top-down to bottom-up exercises are chosen to target cognitive domains such as divided and selective attention, short-term and working memory, orientation skills and social cognition. Cognitive and emotional data will be collected before the training, half way through, and after the training, to assess progress in several aspects of their functioning.

The investigators hypothesize bottom-up to top-down and top-down to bottom-up trainings will be effective as compared to the control games. They also expect that bottom-up to top-down training to be more efficient compared to top-down to bottom-up training because the first targets more basic cognitive functions which then allows triggering higher cognitive functions, reaching optimal cognitive performance levels more rapidly, where as the second may start with a too high demand on cognitive functions, which may compromise participants ability to reach optimal levels of cognitive performance as fast as the first type of training, if they do not have the "bottom-up lever" first. The investigators also hypothesize that both trainings will improve quality of life.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

150

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brésil, 21941590
        • Recrutement
        • Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

60 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age above 60 years old; Portuguese as main language (learned before 12 years of age); Mini Mental State Examination above 26 points;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intellectual Quotient below 70; serious medical or neurological condition preventing from participation in the study; substance abuse (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders-IV criteria).

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Bottom-up to top-down cognitive training
Participants are given 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially bottom-up cognitive processes, followed by 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially top-down cognitive processes
40 hours of a computerized cognitive training, given 1 hour daily
Autres noms:
  • entraînement cognitif
  • entraînement
Comparateur actif: Top-down to bottom-up cognitive training
Participants are given 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially top-down cognitive processes, followed by 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially bottom-up cognitive processes
40 hours of a computerized cognitive training, given 1 hour daily
Autres noms:
  • entraînement cognitif
  • entraînement
Comparateur placebo: Computer games
Participants are given 40 hours of computer games commonly found on the internet and which do not involve a high demand in cognitive functions (e.g. fishing game, pinball game, tetris, etc).

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Global cognition score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
An average of all the cognitive measures will be done to calculate the global cognition score and change will be made between endpoint and midpoint and midpoint and baseline
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Processing speed score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Processing speed score will be measured using the identification task from Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Attention score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Attention score will be measured using the detection task from Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Concentration score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Concentration score will be measured using the Trail Making Test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Short-term memory score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Short- term memory score will be measured using the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
long-term memory score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
long- term memory score will be measured using the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
learning score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
learning score will be measured using the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
working memory score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
working memory score will be measured using the 1-back and 2-back tasks from the Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Semantic memory score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
semantic memory score will be measured using the Verbal fluency test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cognitive flexibility score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cognitive flexibility score will be measured using the Set shifting task from the Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
social cognition score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Social cognition score will be measured using the Social-Emotional Cognition task from the Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Depression score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Depression score will be measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Instrumental activity of daily living score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Instrumental activity of daily living score will be measured using the Lawton instrumental activity of daily living scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Independence in activities of daily living score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Independence in activities of daily living score will be measured using the Katz Independence in activities of daily living scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Functional status score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Functional status score will be measured using the Direct Assessment of Functional Status questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timed instrumental activities of daily living score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timed instrumental activities of daily living score will be measured using the Timed instrumental activities of daily living scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physical activity score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physical activity score will be measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Praxis score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Praxis score will be measured using the Cambridge Cognition Examination test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Episodic memory score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Episodic memory score will be measured using the Cambridge Cognition Examination test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of life score change
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of life will be assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Rogério Panizzutti, M.D, PhD, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 janvier 2014

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

1 décembre 2018

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

1 décembre 2019

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

14 décembre 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 décembre 2015

Première publication (Estimation)

16 décembre 2015

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 janvier 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

12 janvier 2018

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 110.180/2013

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner