Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Computerized Cognitive Training for the Elderly

12 de janeiro de 2018 atualizado por: Rogerio Panizzutti, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of a neuroplasticity-based computerized cognitive training for the elderly

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Cognitive impairments are prominent features of aging and are mostly characterized by memory difficulties. Neuroplasticity based computerized cognitive trainings have been emerging for the last two decades and are an attempt to help the elderly population with their impairments.

The aim of this study is to perform a computerized cognitive training to improve attention, concentration, learning, and quality of life in elderly participants. The investigators are interested in testing the differential efficacy between a bottom-up to top-down versus a top-down to bottom-up computerized cognitive training.

The investigators will conduct a 40 hours computerized, adaptable, cognitive training program in participants 60 years of age and above. Participants will come for 1 hour, daily, and perform a bottom-up to top-down or top-down to bottom-up training, or control games for about 2 months. Bottom-up to top-down and top-down to bottom-up exercises are chosen to target cognitive domains such as divided and selective attention, short-term and working memory, orientation skills and social cognition. Cognitive and emotional data will be collected before the training, half way through, and after the training, to assess progress in several aspects of their functioning.

The investigators hypothesize bottom-up to top-down and top-down to bottom-up trainings will be effective as compared to the control games. They also expect that bottom-up to top-down training to be more efficient compared to top-down to bottom-up training because the first targets more basic cognitive functions which then allows triggering higher cognitive functions, reaching optimal cognitive performance levels more rapidly, where as the second may start with a too high demand on cognitive functions, which may compromise participants ability to reach optimal levels of cognitive performance as fast as the first type of training, if they do not have the "bottom-up lever" first. The investigators also hypothesize that both trainings will improve quality of life.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Antecipado)

150

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 21941590
        • Recrutamento
        • Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

60 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age above 60 years old; Portuguese as main language (learned before 12 years of age); Mini Mental State Examination above 26 points;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intellectual Quotient below 70; serious medical or neurological condition preventing from participation in the study; substance abuse (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders-IV criteria).

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Triplo

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Bottom-up to top-down cognitive training
Participants are given 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially bottom-up cognitive processes, followed by 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially top-down cognitive processes
40 hours of a computerized cognitive training, given 1 hour daily
Outros nomes:
  • treinamento cognitivo
  • treinamento
Comparador Ativo: Top-down to bottom-up cognitive training
Participants are given 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially top-down cognitive processes, followed by 20 hours of cognitive training with exercises that involve essentially bottom-up cognitive processes
40 hours of a computerized cognitive training, given 1 hour daily
Outros nomes:
  • treinamento cognitivo
  • treinamento
Comparador de Placebo: Computer games
Participants are given 40 hours of computer games commonly found on the internet and which do not involve a high demand in cognitive functions (e.g. fishing game, pinball game, tetris, etc).

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Global cognition score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
An average of all the cognitive measures will be done to calculate the global cognition score and change will be made between endpoint and midpoint and midpoint and baseline
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Processing speed score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Processing speed score will be measured using the identification task from Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Attention score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Attention score will be measured using the detection task from Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Concentration score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Concentration score will be measured using the Trail Making Test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Short-term memory score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Short- term memory score will be measured using the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
long-term memory score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
long- term memory score will be measured using the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
learning score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
learning score will be measured using the Rey Auditory-Verbal learning test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
working memory score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
working memory score will be measured using the 1-back and 2-back tasks from the Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Semantic memory score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
semantic memory score will be measured using the Verbal fluency test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cognitive flexibility score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cognitive flexibility score will be measured using the Set shifting task from the Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
social cognition score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Social cognition score will be measured using the Social-Emotional Cognition task from the Cogstate tests battery
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Depression score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Depression score will be measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Instrumental activity of daily living score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Instrumental activity of daily living score will be measured using the Lawton instrumental activity of daily living scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Independence in activities of daily living score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Independence in activities of daily living score will be measured using the Katz Independence in activities of daily living scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Functional status score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Functional status score will be measured using the Direct Assessment of Functional Status questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timed instrumental activities of daily living score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timed instrumental activities of daily living score will be measured using the Timed instrumental activities of daily living scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physical activity score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physical activity score will be measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Praxis score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Praxis score will be measured using the Cambridge Cognition Examination test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Episodic memory score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Episodic memory score will be measured using the Cambridge Cognition Examination test
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of life score change
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of life will be assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Rogério Panizzutti, M.D, PhD, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de janeiro de 2014

Conclusão Primária (Antecipado)

1 de dezembro de 2018

Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)

1 de dezembro de 2019

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

14 de dezembro de 2015

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

15 de dezembro de 2015

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

16 de dezembro de 2015

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

17 de janeiro de 2018

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

12 de janeiro de 2018

Última verificação

1 de janeiro de 2018

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 110.180/2013

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Computerized cognitive training

Se inscrever