Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Peer Groups for Healthy Pregnancy & HIV Prevention for Young Malawian Women

9 septembre 2016 mis à jour par: Kathy Norr, University of Illinois at Chicago
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of an innovative, culturally relevant, community-based peer group intervention to increase young rural Malawian women's preconception behaviors to optimize their reproductive health. The study uses a longitudinal, two group (two-arm) design with a delayed control group.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Maintaining optimal reproductive health in the context of high HIV prevalence is a serious dilemma facing young women in Malawi and other high HIV prevalence countries. Optimal reproductive health requires practicing preconception behaviors to promote overall health including avoiding HIV infection. These healthy preconception behaviors include: practicing safer sex (abstaining or using condoms) to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV infection; obtaining treatment for STIs; maintaining good health habits such as diet, exercise and avoiding substance use; using an effective family planning method to prevent unintended pregnancy; and having an HIV test periodically and with the partner when conception is intended. However the Malawi Demographic and Health Survey provides evidence that few women ages 15-20 in Malawi currently practice these healthy preconception behaviors. Currently, no programs in Malawi offer an integrated approach to optimal reproductive health.

To fill this gap, this study developed an innovative, culturally relevant, community-based peer group intervention to increase young rural Malawian women's preconception behaviors to optimize their reproductive health. The intervention is called Mzanga Samala Moyo Wako ([Mzanga] Sharing Responsibility for Pregnancy Planning and HIV Prevention). Mzanga builds on the investigators' previous research in Malawi, which tested a culturally relevant HIV prevention peer group intervention that changed HIV prevention-related knowledge, attitudes, and safer sex behaviors for rural adults and adolescents. This study integrated that prior HIV prevention content with new content on maintaining health, family planning, and preconception HIV testing.

The purpose of this study is to test Mzanga's efficacy using a longitudinal, two group (two arm) design: intervention group and delayed control group. Because Mzanga is expected to diffuse widely, we randomize at the community rather than the individual level. Eighteen geographically separate rural communities stratified by size and distance from the main paved road and then randomly assigned to Mzanga or the delayed control condition. We implement Mzanga in 9 waves. A final sample of 345 per group after attrition provides adequate power (80%) to detect small-to-medium effects. After baseline data collection, the Mzanga group receives the eight-session intervention. Outcomes are measured at 9 months post-baseline (6 months post-intervention), followed by a booster session for the Mzanga group, and final evaluation at 15 months post-baseline. After the 15-month data collection, Mzanga is offered to the delayed control group.

The study aims and hypotheses are:

Aim 1. To test the efficacy of the Mzanga intervention for improving reproductive health outcome mediating and behavioral variables for Malawian rural young women at 9 and 15 months post-baseline.

H1.Controlling for baseline differences and group effects, compared to the delayed control group, the intervention group will show more positive mediating and behavioral outcomes:

  1. Practice safer sex,
  2. Obtain prompt treatment for STI symptoms;
  3. Maintain good health habits (diet, exercise, substance use);
  4. Use an effective family planning method except when pregnancy is intended;
  5. Have an HIV test periodically, with partner when conception is intended; and
  6. More positive scores for the mediating variables of knowledge, attitudes, perceived norms, self-efficacy, and intentions for each of these behaviors.

Aim 2. To test a theoretical model of the mechanisms through which the Mzanga intervention changes preconception health behaviors of young women in rural Malawi.

H2. Mzanga's effects on healthy preconception behaviors (a-e above) will be mediated by knowledge, attitudes, perceived norms, self-efficacy, and intention scores.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

810

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

15 ans à 20 ans (Enfant, Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Femelle

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lives in designated community

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive or other condition that makes the participant unable to converse in a group or answer questions

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Groupe de contrôle
aucune intervention
Expérimental: Intervention group
Reproductive Health Peer Groups
8 small group sessions led by community young women, focused on reproductive health, including HIV, STI and unintended pregnancy prevention; includes skill-building for self-efficacy

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
change in unprotected sex
Délai: Change from baseline to 15 months post-baseline
Change in having sex without a condom (n the last 2 months) from baseline to 15-months post-baseline, measured by 2 questions, have you had sex in the last 2 months, and (for those who had sex) have you used a condom 'always, sometimes or never'; if had sex and have not used a condom always are coded 'yes', had unprotected sex; all other responses are coded no.
Change from baseline to 15 months post-baseline

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in having had an HIV test
Délai: Change in having had an HIV test from baseline to 15 months post-baseline
change in whether had a recent HIV test (within the last 12 months) from baseline to 15-months post-baseline
Change in having had an HIV test from baseline to 15 months post-baseline
change in having sexually transmitted infection (STI) symptoms
Délai: baseline to 15 months post-baseline
change in reported STI symptoms between baseline and 9-month and 15-month survey
baseline to 15 months post-baseline
Change in unintended pregnancy
Délai: Change in unintended pregnancy from baseline to 15 months post-intervention
Change in reported unintended pregnancy between baseline and 15-months post-baseline; measured by whether pregnant, confirmed visually and by pregnancy test, and whether reported in intending to become pregnant
Change in unintended pregnancy from baseline to 15 months post-intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Kathleen F. Norr, PhD, University of Illinois at Chicago

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mai 2009

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juillet 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 avril 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

1 août 2016

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 août 2016

Première publication (Estimation)

30 août 2016

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

12 septembre 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 septembre 2016

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2016

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • R01HD060461 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Deidentified data will be made available 5 yrs. after study completion by request to the PI

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

3
S'abonner