The Effect of Social Relationships on Psychological Distress and Disease Progression in Patients With Diabetes
17 mars 2017 mis à jour par: Tom Elliott, BCDiabetes.Ca
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Relationships on Psychological Distress and Disease Progression in Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study will determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a monthly social support group along with a weekly peer-to-peer meeting in improving perceived level of social support, diabetes distress, and A1c profiles in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus, compared with standard care offered at British Columbia Diabetes (BC Diabetes).
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Inconnue
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded comparative group clinical trial of 48 participants receiving social interaction in addition to standard diabetes care or standard diabetes care alone. All participants will have a baseline and 6 month follow-up visit where assessment of their A1C, diabetes distress, and social support will be performed.
Participants randomized to the social interaction cohort will meet on a monthly basis for a two hour group session designed to build social connections. In addition, participants will be paired with another study participant in this group, and will be asked to meet on a monthly basis for a minimum of 45 minutes. All participants in the social support cohort will continue to receive best standard diabetes management.
Participants in the control group will be treated with standard diabetes care. At the end of the 6-month study, they will have the opportunity to engage in the same social interventions offered to the social interaction group.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Anticipé)
48
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
19 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willingly provide your full informed consent to participate;
- Are at least 19 years of age;
- Have an established diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus;
- Have a Diabetes Distress Screening Scale (a score of 2-3 is considered moderate distress, 3-4 is considered high)
- Have a Social Provisions Scale score less than 60 (a score of 80-90 is considered high, 60-80 moderate and less than 60 sub-optimal)
- Have an A1c greater than 8.5% in the last 2 months (a score of 6-7 is considered optimal, 7-8 sub-optimal and >8.0 inadequate)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Are unable to easily communicate in oral and written English.
- Have a physical disability or psychiatric diagnosis which would limit the ability to participate in the study;
- Are a prisoner, or in pre-trial;
- Do not have a fixed address;
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Social relationships intervention
Participants randomized to the social interaction cohort will be split into two groups of 12. Each group of 12 will meet together once a month for a two-hour support group. Each participant will be allowed five minutes to "check-in" with the support group. During the 5 minute period the participant is encouraged to share their innermost thoughts and feelings in the knowledge that this information will not be shared outside the group. Participants will additionally be paired with another study participant in the same cohort and will be asked to meet outside group sessions once a week for a minimum of 45 minutes. The pairing process will take place by study investigators and will be sensitive to gender, age, and neighbourhood of residence. Participants who find that their paired partner is not suitable may ask the facilitators to help find a more suitable match. These participants will continue to receive BC Diabetes standard care. |
Participants randomized to the social interaction cohort will meet on a monthly basis for a two hour group session designed to build social connections.
In addition, participants will be paired with another study participant in this group, and will be asked to meet on a monthly basis for a minimum of 45 minutes.
All participants in the social support cohort will continue to receive best standard diabetes management.
|
|
Aucune intervention: Control cohort
Patients in the control group will receive BC Diabetes standard care.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
A1C
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Hemoglobin A1C blood test
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Diabetes distress
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Score on Diabetes Distress Screening Scale
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Self-reported social support
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Score on Social Provisions Scale
|
6 months post randomization
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Blood pressure
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Blood pressure
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Medical adherence
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will indicate their level of medication adherence on a scale of 1-5.
To do this, they will respond to the question "To what extent do you agree with the following statement: I reliably take my diabetes-related medication", where the possible responses are: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
These responses will be converted into a 5-point scale where strongly disagree = 1 and strongly agree = 5
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Statin refusal
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will score yes (if they refuse statin treatment) or no (if they do not refuse statin treatment)
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Diet
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will score their diet on a scale of 1-5.
To do this, they will respond to the question " I currently have a good diet", where the possible responses are: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
These responses will be converted into a 5-point scale where strongly disagree = 1 and strongly agree = 5
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Exercise
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will score their exercise on a scale of 1-5.
To do this, they will respond to the question "I currently get enough exercise", where the possible responses are: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
These responses will be converted into a 5-point scale where strongly disagree = 1 and strongly agree = 5
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Weight
Délai: 6 months post randomization
|
Weight will be recorded in kilograms
|
6 months post randomization
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Thomas Elliott, MBBS, BC Diabetes, The University of British Columbia
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):259-64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1572. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
- Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.
- Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2004 May 15;363(9421):1589-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8.
- Byrne D, Alvaregna M editors. Handbook of Psychocardiology. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2016.
- Ducat L, Philipson LH, Anderson BJ. The mental health comorbidities of diabetes. JAMA. 2014 Aug 20;312(7):691-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.8040. No abstract available.
- Feng X, Astell-Burt T. What types of social interactions reduce the risk of psychological distress? Fixed effects longitudinal analysis of a cohort of 30,271 middle-to-older aged Australians. J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 1;204:99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.041. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
- Hackett RA, Steptoe A. Psychosocial Factors in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):95. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0771-4.
- Rabi DM, Edwards AL, Southern DA, Svenson LW, Sargious PM, Norton P, Larsen ET, Ghali WA. Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 3;6:124. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-124.
- O'Kane C, O'Kane D. Real: The Power of Authentic Connection. 1st ed. Clearmind publishing; 2016.
- Rossi MC, Lucisano G, Funnell M, Pintaudi B, Bulotta A, Gentile S, Scardapane M, Skovlund SE, Vespasiani G, Nicolucci A; BENCH-D Study Group. Interplay among patient empowerment and clinical and person-centered outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The BENCH-D study. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 21.
- Siousioura D. Review of therapeutic groups for type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. J Endocrinol Diabetes 2012;3(2):11-21.
- Young-Hyman D, de Groot M, Hill-Briggs F, Gonzalez JS, Hood K, Peyrot M. Erratum. Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2126-2140. Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):287. doi: 10.2337/dc17-er02. Epub 2016 Dec 7. No abstract available.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Anticipé)
1 avril 2017
Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)
1 octobre 2017
Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)
1 décembre 2017
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
14 mars 2017
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
17 mars 2017
Première publication (Réel)
20 mars 2017
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
20 mars 2017
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
17 mars 2017
Dernière vérification
1 mars 2017
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- Love&Support
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
INDÉCIS
Description du régime IPD
At the end of the study, anonymized participant data may be shared with other researchers wishing to undergo similar studies to assist with study design and implementation.
Données/documents d'étude
-
Formulaire de consentement éclairé
Commentaires d'informations: Informed consent form
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .