The Effect of Social Relationships on Psychological Distress and Disease Progression in Patients With Diabetes
17. März 2017 aktualisiert von: Tom Elliott, BCDiabetes.Ca
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Relationships on Psychological Distress and Disease Progression in Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study will determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a monthly social support group along with a weekly peer-to-peer meeting in improving perceived level of social support, diabetes distress, and A1c profiles in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus, compared with standard care offered at British Columbia Diabetes (BC Diabetes).
Studienübersicht
Status
Unbekannt
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded comparative group clinical trial of 48 participants receiving social interaction in addition to standard diabetes care or standard diabetes care alone. All participants will have a baseline and 6 month follow-up visit where assessment of their A1C, diabetes distress, and social support will be performed.
Participants randomized to the social interaction cohort will meet on a monthly basis for a two hour group session designed to build social connections. In addition, participants will be paired with another study participant in this group, and will be asked to meet on a monthly basis for a minimum of 45 minutes. All participants in the social support cohort will continue to receive best standard diabetes management.
Participants in the control group will be treated with standard diabetes care. At the end of the 6-month study, they will have the opportunity to engage in the same social interventions offered to the social interaction group.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)
48
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
19 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willingly provide your full informed consent to participate;
- Are at least 19 years of age;
- Have an established diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus;
- Have a Diabetes Distress Screening Scale (a score of 2-3 is considered moderate distress, 3-4 is considered high)
- Have a Social Provisions Scale score less than 60 (a score of 80-90 is considered high, 60-80 moderate and less than 60 sub-optimal)
- Have an A1c greater than 8.5% in the last 2 months (a score of 6-7 is considered optimal, 7-8 sub-optimal and >8.0 inadequate)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Are unable to easily communicate in oral and written English.
- Have a physical disability or psychiatric diagnosis which would limit the ability to participate in the study;
- Are a prisoner, or in pre-trial;
- Do not have a fixed address;
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Social relationships intervention
Participants randomized to the social interaction cohort will be split into two groups of 12. Each group of 12 will meet together once a month for a two-hour support group. Each participant will be allowed five minutes to "check-in" with the support group. During the 5 minute period the participant is encouraged to share their innermost thoughts and feelings in the knowledge that this information will not be shared outside the group. Participants will additionally be paired with another study participant in the same cohort and will be asked to meet outside group sessions once a week for a minimum of 45 minutes. The pairing process will take place by study investigators and will be sensitive to gender, age, and neighbourhood of residence. Participants who find that their paired partner is not suitable may ask the facilitators to help find a more suitable match. These participants will continue to receive BC Diabetes standard care. |
Participants randomized to the social interaction cohort will meet on a monthly basis for a two hour group session designed to build social connections.
In addition, participants will be paired with another study participant in this group, and will be asked to meet on a monthly basis for a minimum of 45 minutes.
All participants in the social support cohort will continue to receive best standard diabetes management.
|
|
Kein Eingriff: Control cohort
Patients in the control group will receive BC Diabetes standard care.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
A1C
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Hemoglobin A1C blood test
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Diabetes distress
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Score on Diabetes Distress Screening Scale
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Self-reported social support
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Score on Social Provisions Scale
|
6 months post randomization
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Blood pressure
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Blood pressure
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Medical adherence
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will indicate their level of medication adherence on a scale of 1-5.
To do this, they will respond to the question "To what extent do you agree with the following statement: I reliably take my diabetes-related medication", where the possible responses are: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
These responses will be converted into a 5-point scale where strongly disagree = 1 and strongly agree = 5
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Statin refusal
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will score yes (if they refuse statin treatment) or no (if they do not refuse statin treatment)
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Diet
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will score their diet on a scale of 1-5.
To do this, they will respond to the question " I currently have a good diet", where the possible responses are: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
These responses will be converted into a 5-point scale where strongly disagree = 1 and strongly agree = 5
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Exercise
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Participants will score their exercise on a scale of 1-5.
To do this, they will respond to the question "I currently get enough exercise", where the possible responses are: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
These responses will be converted into a 5-point scale where strongly disagree = 1 and strongly agree = 5
|
6 months post randomization
|
|
Weight
Zeitfenster: 6 months post randomization
|
Weight will be recorded in kilograms
|
6 months post randomization
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Thomas Elliott, MBBS, BC Diabetes, The University of British Columbia
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):259-64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1572. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
- Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.
- Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2004 May 15;363(9421):1589-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8.
- Byrne D, Alvaregna M editors. Handbook of Psychocardiology. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2016.
- Ducat L, Philipson LH, Anderson BJ. The mental health comorbidities of diabetes. JAMA. 2014 Aug 20;312(7):691-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.8040. No abstract available.
- Feng X, Astell-Burt T. What types of social interactions reduce the risk of psychological distress? Fixed effects longitudinal analysis of a cohort of 30,271 middle-to-older aged Australians. J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 1;204:99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.041. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
- Hackett RA, Steptoe A. Psychosocial Factors in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):95. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0771-4.
- Rabi DM, Edwards AL, Southern DA, Svenson LW, Sargious PM, Norton P, Larsen ET, Ghali WA. Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 3;6:124. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-124.
- O'Kane C, O'Kane D. Real: The Power of Authentic Connection. 1st ed. Clearmind publishing; 2016.
- Rossi MC, Lucisano G, Funnell M, Pintaudi B, Bulotta A, Gentile S, Scardapane M, Skovlund SE, Vespasiani G, Nicolucci A; BENCH-D Study Group. Interplay among patient empowerment and clinical and person-centered outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The BENCH-D study. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 21.
- Siousioura D. Review of therapeutic groups for type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. J Endocrinol Diabetes 2012;3(2):11-21.
- Young-Hyman D, de Groot M, Hill-Briggs F, Gonzalez JS, Hood K, Peyrot M. Erratum. Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2126-2140. Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):287. doi: 10.2337/dc17-er02. Epub 2016 Dec 7. No abstract available.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Voraussichtlich)
1. April 2017
Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)
1. Oktober 2017
Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)
1. Dezember 2017
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
14. März 2017
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
17. März 2017
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
20. März 2017
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
20. März 2017
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
17. März 2017
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. März 2017
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- Love&Support
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
UNENTSCHIEDEN
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
At the end of the study, anonymized participant data may be shared with other researchers wishing to undergo similar studies to assist with study design and implementation.
Studiendaten/Dokumente
-
Einwilligungserklärung
Informationskommentare: Informed consent form
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .